![]() |
Texas Rankings
Similar to what Joe Ross did for California (in this thread) I have applied the FiM ranking system to teams in texas through week 2.
Here are the FiM points system. Code:
POINT CATEGORY POINTS POINTS I plan on updating this through the season using the teams's first two regional performances. At this point there are 2 teams which have had 2 events (and they are marked with an *). Also many teams have not played. Code:
Rank Team Points |
Re: Texas Rankings
I know you said there would be changes to this, will chairmans and eingineering inspiration be added to the awards list?
|
Re: Texas Rankings
Quote:
|
Re: Texas Rankings
Quote:
Seriously, though, thanks for putting this together, our team loves data! |
Re: Texas Rankings
Quote:
The real question is when Texas goes to districts how big will the state championship be. Quote:
|
Re: Texas Rankings
Quote:
|
Re: Texas Rankings
Quote:
|
Re: Texas Rankings
Quote:
|
Re: Texas Rankings
Quote:
RCA automatically qualifies your robot to attend the State/Region CMP. EI and RAS were able to attend (sans robot) and set up a booth to compete for those awards. |
Re: Texas Rankings
Greg,
You beat me to it. I kept one of these last year for curiosity sake. Do you have a spreadsheet for the calculations or doing it by hand? Joe Ross and I were visiting about it. I asked him how he would handle teams that compete in more than two tournaments? He is keeping one with an average as well for each team. Very interesting information to look at. I also wonder if the District model will only include Texas. See you in San Antonio at Alamo. |
Re: Texas Rankings
Quote:
Glad to see other people around Texas are thinking along similar lines. Thanks for posting. |
Re: Texas Rankings
Quote:
I have no idea how the districts will be setup. I have heard rumblings with all sorts of possibilities including what states (or countries) get included and when the change will happen (next year or the following year or beyond). I look forward to seeing you and your team at Alamo. Quote:
|
Re: Texas Rankings
I imagine we'll probably get Oklahoma, and arkansas included. I doubt Mexico because of the logistical implications. Theyll probably get their own regional once texas and the south moves to district, since they wont be able to come into the district events.
|
Re: Texas Rankings
1 Attachment(s)
Greg thanks for putting this data together.
Since we're talking about Texas Districts. First I know nothing official except I'm pretty sure we're not going to districts next season. 2nd everyone that's interested should look at what New England is putting together. http://www.nefirst.org/blog/. Their model solves a lot of the problems we would have in Texas with the FiM model. We still don't know if FIRST is going to approve their proposal. It eliminates the requirement for two events before the district championship which would be very difficult on some of our teams from the south and from the west. Also attached is a graphic that someone (I don't know who) produced that has Texas as a region all by itself and it includes the eventual Super Regionals. Before we go to a full District system I think we should work on getting a state championship after FRC Championships like Minnesota. http://www.mnfirstregional.org/offseason/mshsl I remember reading about this idea somewhere in the FIRSTinTexas strategic plan but I can't find it now. |
Re: Texas Rankings
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:07. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi