Ontario/Quebec Rankings
 

Figured I'd follow California, Texas, and Missouri/Kansas's lead, and do one of these for Ontario/Quebec.

The FIRST in Michigan rules supplement, which includes the points system, can be found here:MI Rules

My team list is ON/QC teams according to: 2013 Teams

I included results from NYRO, NHMA, ONTO, QCMO, NYNY, and PAPI, which I believe is everywhere that ON/QC teams have played. Someone correct me if I'm wrong on that.

Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
 

If only we didn't die in three matches we would be a bit higher in the rankings :(

Should this not be average per regional? Since some teams went to 2 regionals their scores are much higher then that of teams that went to one regional. For example 1114 and 2056 have only gone to 1 regional, while 3387 and 3386 have went to two, making them have a higher ranking? Just a thought :p

Thanks for doing this

Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
 

771 competed at NYNY.

7-1 record, fourth alliance captain, quarter-finalists, and the Entrepreneurship award.

Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
 

For some reason, I find it amusing that 2056 is one point better than 1114.

Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
 

Fixed in OP.

In other observations: Wow. That's a strong showing for 771.

Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
 

Very impressive. The top 5 seeds all had 7 wins, it went to tiebreak points.

Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
 

Interesting to see how these rankings will stand after Waterloo and GTRWest. Those will be really entertaining to watch. My team was just commenting how Montreal would have been a fun regional, albeit expensive.

Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
 

All these rankings give me an idea.

Why don't we do this ranking process for the whole world in order to see approximatly who would be able to go to the World Championship under a "district" points system? Simply double the number of points teams that only attend one regional get; it wouldn't be perfect by any stretch of the imagination but it would be very interesting to be able to run numbers on the prospective teams attending as compaired to the actual teams attending among other things.

While I don't have the time to do this myself I would be very interested in seeing it if someone else wanted to take it up; I'm sure lots of people would appreciate it.

Nice job with the rankings
Regards, Bryan

Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
 

The situation is quite different in Canada to use the same ranking rules as FiM. The latter is geared towards two district events per team at a minimum; in Canada, Ontarian teams might do two or all three events in Ontario, and in Quebec, all teams but 5-6 only participate in one event, the Montreal regionals. So, if a team decides to participate in a second event, it will automatically have an edge.

Not saying that 3386 and 3387 are not good teams - you should all have seen them in the Montreal regionals last week, they were more than amazing - but it's funny that they are ranked higher than 1114 and 2056.

We should make a ranking system for Canada just for fun! :P

Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
 

Oh sorry, at first I didn't realize this was the points for a district scoring system

Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
 

Its understood that directly applying the FiM system to Canada doesn't properly account for teams that don't attend exactly two regionals.

I think calculating these rankings has become popular because it is expected that many regions will be converting to the District model (which will likely include a very FiM-like points system) in the next 1-3 years. Seeing how things might be different is an interesting exercise.

After this coming week, when 1114 and 2056 among others have played a second regional, then comparing them to 3387 and 3386 will make more sense. At this point, it really only makes sense to compare teams with the same number of regionals complete (so for 2 regionals, that would be 3387, 3386, 1075, 2809, 3360, 3985, 3530, 3550, 3988)

Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
 

I see that many are crunching these numbers out in their respective regions and posting the results. For this thread, doing this provides a great deal of insight into a potential future for the District Points System to be in place across all provinces in Canada. As mentioned, we're probably talking within the next several years. At least for now, it will be really interesting to see how all this turns out after 3/4 more weeks of competition.

Great work Racer26!

Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
 

After Week 4, it looks like this:

I've added ONWA and MABO results.

Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
 

Very impressive from all the traditional Canadian powerhouse teams!!

Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
 

Very impressed with 1503 and 3390, being ranked so high with only 1 event so far.