![]() |
Ontario/Quebec Rankings
Figured I'd follow California, Texas, and Missouri/Kansas's lead, and do one of these for Ontario/Quebec.
The FIRST in Michigan rules supplement, which includes the points system, can be found here:MI Rules My team list is ON/QC teams according to: 2013 Teams I included results from NYRO, NHMA, ONTO, QCMO, NYNY, and PAPI, which I believe is everywhere that ON/QC teams have played. Someone correct me if I'm wrong on that. Code:
Team ONTO QCMO NHMA NYRO NYNY PAPI Total |
Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
If only we didn't die in three matches we would be a bit higher in the rankings :(
Should this not be average per regional? Since some teams went to 2 regionals their scores are much higher then that of teams that went to one regional. For example 1114 and 2056 have only gone to 1 regional, while 3387 and 3386 have went to two, making them have a higher ranking? Just a thought :p Thanks for doing this |
Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
771 competed at NYNY.
7-1 record, fourth alliance captain, quarter-finalists, and the Entrepreneurship award. |
Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
For some reason, I find it amusing that 2056 is one point better than 1114.
|
Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
Quote:
In other observations: Wow. That's a strong showing for 771. |
Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
Quote:
|
Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
Interesting to see how these rankings will stand after Waterloo and GTRWest. Those will be really entertaining to watch. My team was just commenting how Montreal would have been a fun regional, albeit expensive.
|
Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
All these rankings give me an idea.
Why don't we do this ranking process for the whole world in order to see approximatly who would be able to go to the World Championship under a "district" points system? Simply double the number of points teams that only attend one regional get; it wouldn't be perfect by any stretch of the imagination but it would be very interesting to be able to run numbers on the prospective teams attending as compaired to the actual teams attending among other things. While I don't have the time to do this myself I would be very interested in seeing it if someone else wanted to take it up; I'm sure lots of people would appreciate it. Nice job with the rankings Regards, Bryan |
Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
Quote:
Not saying that 3386 and 3387 are not good teams - you should all have seen them in the Montreal regionals last week, they were more than amazing - but it's funny that they are ranked higher than 1114 and 2056. We should make a ranking system for Canada just for fun! :P |
Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
Oh sorry, at first I didn't realize this was the points for a district scoring system
|
Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
Quote:
I think calculating these rankings has become popular because it is expected that many regions will be converting to the District model (which will likely include a very FiM-like points system) in the next 1-3 years. Seeing how things might be different is an interesting exercise. After this coming week, when 1114 and 2056 among others have played a second regional, then comparing them to 3387 and 3386 will make more sense. At this point, it really only makes sense to compare teams with the same number of regionals complete (so for 2 regionals, that would be 3387, 3386, 1075, 2809, 3360, 3985, 3530, 3550, 3988) |
Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
Quote:
Quote:
Great work Racer26! |
Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
After Week 4, it looks like this:
I've added ONWA and MABO results. Code:
Team ONTO QCMO NHMA NYRO NYNY PAPI ONWA MABO Total |
Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
Very impressive from all the traditional Canadian powerhouse teams!!
|
Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
Very impressed with 1503 and 3390, being ranked so high with only 1 event so far.
|
Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
After weeks 5 and 6, it looks like this. Note: I made it so that totals were calculated only on a teams first two chronological events but still showed the amount of points they would have earned at the third (unless your third was ABCA), which means that for several teams at ONTO2, and all ON teams at ABCA except 4001, those events didn't count.
Code:
Rank Team ONTO QCMO NHMA NYRO NYNY PAPI ONWA MABO ONTO2 MELE OHCL ABCA TotalInterestingly, several teams made the cut while only attending one event, and several more would have made the cut on a single event's points, despite attending more than one. I suspect though, that the cutoff is artificially low due to having less events than a true district system. |
Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
I think you missed second events for both 2200 and 2386 who both attended the Pinetree Regional in Maine - week 6. Why not show the Calgary points for the other teams that attended Calgary - 771, 1305 and 1334?
|
Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
781 also attended Buckeye, which I don't think was listed. It was their third event though, so it doesn't matter for points.
|
Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
I updated it to add 2200/2386 at MELE, and also added the points for 771, 1305, and 1334 at ABCA.
I noticed in checking though, that I'd screwed up all the points for 2nd picks, (inadvertently giving them the reverse of what they deserved, so #8 alliance second pick received 1 pt instead of 8, and #1 alliance second pick received 8pts instead of 1). Because of how I built my spreadsheet, fixing this isn't easy. Working on a fix, will post again when fixed, though it shouldn't change standings too much. |
Re: Ontario/Quebec Rankings
Fixed. Also, added 781 @ OHCL for interest. Interestingly enough, 4343 was one of the teams most negatively affected by my error.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:37. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi