![]() |
NASA Suspends STEM programs!
I posted this in the NASA discussion at the bottom, but this is important enough that I am also posting this here in the General Discussion.
Unfortunately, NASA's STEM outreach programs have become a political football. This article spells out what the sequester has brought. I'm not sure what this means for NASA home teams, but it can't be good. -- Len |
Re: NASA Suspends STEM programs!
I wouldn't get too worked up without knowing the details of how it affects NASA's involvement with FIRST. No need for fear-mongering.
|
Re: NASA Suspends STEM programs!
The article I linked to had the full memo, and an update to some specific guidance. It doesn't appear that any FIRST involvement was specifically exempted, although the one mentioned cutoff date of April 30 for waivers may have been to avoid explicit mention for exemption.
I know that there are many NASA people here, who may have more information than what was leaked. My team is a NASA home team, and we are extremely grateful for the support that has been provided to us by NASA. I also know that many people from NASA attend regionals as part of their outreach mission. My reading of the memo and the specific guidance memo, is that this support is now pulled for the remainder of FY 2013. -- Len |
Re: NASA Suspends STEM programs!
I wonder how they're planning to handle existing contractual obligations, especially if they involve sunk costs or penalties for non-performance. After all, for some activities, the fiscal costs, social costs, or both might actually be higher in case of cancellation. (If they're on top of things, those would have been identified already, and waivers decided upon before the issuance of the memorandum.)
Also, does "mission critical" have a special meaning in NASA jargon? And what's the scope? If an organizational unit's mission is to perform STEM outreach, is all STEM outreach "mission critical"? |
Re: NASA Suspends STEM programs!
The problem with the sequester is that what the are cutting is everything which interfaces with the public like (possibly) STEM. National park services and other *non-essential* services. The politics is as to teach the public, 'this is what you get for asking us to spend more wisely, so don't ask us to do this anymore'. Its an outrage. <political rant off>
|
Re: NASA Suspends STEM programs!
Quote:
They could cut completely invisible and unnecessary spending, but instead they choose to do things this way. </political rant> |
Re: NASA Suspends STEM programs!
Let's at least try to look for a bright side in this otherwise bad news. We do have a serious budget problem in this country, and while painful, this could help to address it. This may not be what some of us would chose to do, but then again just about every program has proponents who argue it is essential. Perhaps having teams work to design complex systems with very few resources can be a great lesson in how to deal with real world problems. I believe that FIRST is certainly strong enough to weather a small setback like this.
|
Re: NASA Suspends STEM programs!
Quote:
|
Re: NASA Suspends STEM programs!
Quote:
IF NASA really is stopping sponsoring FIRST, it is not a "small setback." It is a truly monumental blow to the program. |
Re: NASA Suspends STEM programs!
Quote:
I think 2014 is going to be a tough year for FIRST and many teams --we'll just need to band together as a community and get through it. I won't be surprised to see the major prime contractors scale back support considerably (Lockheed, UTC, BAE & Boeing all have difficult decisions to make including laying off employees). |
Re: NASA Suspends STEM programs!
I saw the same article and contemplated posting this on Chief, but after rereading it a couple times, the wording and what was being targeted did not seem to include FIRST. If it did, I was under the impression that this was more targeted at many minor events that NASA would normally attend (such as smaller events like NASA employees traveling to schools or something).
I interpreted this as three things: 1. Journalistic Overstatement: The writer of the article interpreted the memo (in the usual journalistic negative and overblown way by entitling it "Sequester Cancels NASA Outreach". This was a memo not a public statement saying "We are stopping all outreach" 2. Targeted at NASA run projects, not NASA funded ones -- Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: NASA Suspends STEM programs!
In addition, if you read the updates further down in the article, it is not "a cancelling of STEM programs"
Quote:
|
Re: NASA Suspends STEM programs!
Quote:
|
Re: NASA Suspends STEM programs!
All I can say is, I hope this passes fairly quickly and NASA is able to continue funding FIRST in 2014.
I'm rather disappointed that Congress has handled the entire thing with the maturity of a high school freshman procrastinating on an essay. One would think that we would have voted them out once they became so dysfunctional that they had to deliberately tie themselves to a metaphorical timebomb to get anything done. Except even with the timebomb they still failed to be remotely productive and pressed the metaphorical snooze button for a year while they got themselves reelected. And when the year had passed and 90% were in their same desks, they hit snooze and presumably watched Jersey Shore for another 3 months before finally just letting the bomb explode. |
Re: NASA Suspends STEM programs!
Young people, and their parents, need exposure to visionary thinkers and doers. So do our politicians. NASA provides much more than just the important funding to the program. It provides inspiration and opportunities for self-discovery, exploring possibilities, innovation, and practical applications. It sets the bar in a way that cannot be duplicated or measured.
Jane |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi