![]() |
OPR after Week Five Events
The OPR/CCWM numbers up to Week 5 events have been posted, please see
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/2174 All events up to Week 5 are now included. I fixed a small bug for each event page in column T for "Record". The formula was wrong for rows beyond the first 37 teams. If you find any error or have any questions, please let me know. |
Re: OPR after Week Five Events
2 Attachment(s)
Weeks 1 thru 5 OPR & CCWM correlation to actual match results. CCWM Column Headings & meaning: Code:
OPR Column Headings & meaning: Code:
|
Re: OPR after Week Five Events
Once again, thank you Ed and Ether for posting this.
Summary of global OPR and CCWM match win/loss predictions: 81.72% and 82.47% respectively. Does anyone have an idea of the number of teams yet to compete in week 6? |
Re: OPR after Week Five Events
Quote:
|
Re: OPR after Week Five Events
Quote:
|
Re: OPR after Week Five Events
Quote:
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...53&postcount=1 |
Re: OPR after Week Five Events
As a second-year non-engineering mentor, I was wondering all off-season what my role on the team would be now the the team was able to mostly sustain itself. I discovered OPR and related statistics this year and they have kept me busy with scouting every week.
Thank you for all the work you do correlating this data each week! It has made FRC so much more interesting for me this year! I love watching the webcasts of high-OPR teams like 1114, and it doesn't hurt that OPR has made my own team look pretty darn good this year, (4th and 2nd in OPR, respectively, in their two district events, even without a banner to show for it). So from a statistics geek from PA... thanks again! |
Re: OPR after Week Five Events
It's bittersweet that we have the 5th highest OPR in the world and didn't qualify for Championship...
|
Re: OPR after Week Five Events
Thanks for this. It was a pleasure to meet and win with you last Saturday.
|
Re: OPR after Week Five Events
Quote:
|
Re: OPR after Week Five Events
Quote:
|
Re: OPR after Week Five Events
Quote:
The reason Ether was questioning is because when we compare teams across different regionals/district, we use World OPR and takes all interactions of teams into account. However it ranks team higher if they have been consistently good at different events than teams that did relatively not as well in their early events and improve a lot in later events. Both ways are valid in considering how good a team is. My suggestion for 624 is to push for a district model in Texas. In the district model, you don't need to win an event to qualify. You just need to be consistently good. In fact it is possible for the 2nd round pick winning alliance team to not make it to State Championship or World Championship in the district model if they were just lucky in one event and do poorly in the other. |
Re: OPR after Week Five Events
1 Attachment(s)
Here's a slightly different view of the data, FWIW. I computed World OPR rankings based on Week5 data only, Week4 data only, Week3 data only, Weeks3&4 data only, Weeks3,4,&5 data only, and Weeks4&5 data only. Results: Code:
|
Re: OPR after Week Five Events
I guess the thing to note in the 624 discussion is that the OPR is a number which reflects past performance and does not predict future results. Every match is open to any alliance winning, whether through multiple miscellaneous technical fouls, superior play, random Murphyisms, or strategic miscellany. It sounds like 624, though playing strongly, has fallen victim to random chance.
|
Re: OPR after Week Five Events
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi