Re: Power State Alliances at Champs
 

Neither 3173 or 3015 are going to St. Louis.

Re: Power State Alliances at Champs
 

Top three Indiana teams:
868 (2 regional wins, #1 and #2 seeds, ridiculously agile cycler)
234 (1 regional win, 1 finalist, #2 and #3 seeds, quick, adaptable cycler)
1741 (FCS, good defender, can scoot under pyramid)

Backup: 447 (1 regional win, 1 finalist, quick and agile cycler, can floor load)

Something that's been overlooked in previous posts - all these teams are very deserving of high-profile awards at the CMP level.

Re: Power State Alliances at Champs
 

For Illinois, I would say-

111-ground collection, pyramid shooter (1 regional win, 1 semi-finals, 3 seed at midwest)
2338-pyramid shooter (1 regional win, 1 semi-finals, 2 seed at midwest)
2481-climb and dumper (1 finals, 6 seed at crossroads)

Neither pwnage or winnovation made it this year. Both of them had really solid bots.

Re: Power State Alliances at Champs
 

Sorry about that. I forgot about the St. Louis part, but they are one of the best in NY.

Re: Power State Alliances at Champs
 

A great alliance indeed. Glad we got a chance to see the 3 you mentioned this season all attending champs.

Re: Power State Alliances at Champs
 

imo we need someone to climb or play defense which is why i picked 2046. 1983 as a better auton than 1899 and ground pickup. And 2471 has ground pickup as well.

Re: Power State Alliances at Champs
 

Michigan

• 469 - 7 Disc Auton - Ground/Feeder
• 67 - 3 Disc Auton - FCS - Climb & Dump (4)
• 1918 - 3 Disc Auton - Ground/Feeder - Climb & Dump (2)

Assume they can score all the disc:
78 Auton Points + 135 Disc Points + 70 Climb Points + 30 Pyramid Disc Points = 313 (or more because of taking the other alliance's disc)

Now if 469 adds a lvl 3 Climber for the Championship, it becomes 333 Points.

-Clinton-

Re: Power State Alliances at Champs
 

I was informed that the Enforcers would not be joining us at Champs. :(

And yes, 195's full court 3-point shot was just getting good by the end of the CT regional. Any 3 of the 5 CT teams already named would be a remarkable alliance with a 240+ non-foul point possibility per game.

If only...but,

If the Canadians can do it, why not, eh?

Re: Power State Alliances at Champs
 

Actually, now that I think about strategy, 2168 would be a great alliance partner. If you have a FCS, a bot that can pick up, and a fast, agile, accurate bot with a great drive train, you can probably wreak.