![]() |
Alliance Scores Histogram
2 Attachment(s)
Weeks 1 thru 7: ... 77 Events, 2509 Teams, 12806 Alliance Scores for 6403 Qual Matches. |
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
Could you post the data as an ogive?
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
Thanks!
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
Can you post a chart for MSC only as a comparison?
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
Yeeeeah. MSC was a whole different game. The competition level was unmatched, the only regionals that even got close were Waterloo and GTRWest, and they don't even hold a candle to it.
Way to go Michigan! |
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
D is for Data, that's good enough for me...
[munch munch munch munch] |
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
That last graph is a bit deceiving since you took the 'all events' line off.
Visually, GTRWest+Waterloo look like they match the 'all events' line, relative to MSC, but in actuality, they're quite a bit stronger if you look at the numbers. |
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
The graphs are interesting though.
Unsurprising that GTRW/Waterloo are very similar (both late season, both in the same geographical region, and both with MANY of the same teams). Whats interesting to me is the slope differential. MAR seems to have a taller slope (which I believe equates to a narrower band of 'average' scores, meaning tighter competition), but the top end lines up with GTRWest and Waterloo fairly well, while MSC is stronger. I think that would suggest that GTRW/Waterloo/MAR all have fairly similar max-score (which I would say is primarily a function of the 'best 2' robots), while MSC is higher throughout the curve. It also suggests to me that MAR's midrange teams are on average stronger, which makes sense, since its an invitation only event. |
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
Pretty cool/relieving to see the data support that MARC was a tough event. Not as tough as MSC, but also there are about half the teams in the region, so the competition won't be quite as high at MARC. Until this point, MARC was receiving a lot of criticism for well known teams declining to attend. I also couldn't help but notice that the game strategy in the region was a little different than every where else due to the defensive, rough-and-tumble nature of many teams in the area. Motors ran hot at the conclusion of each match.
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
Quote:
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
1 Attachment(s)
A histogram may answer some of the questions. |
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
Well, that 171 score in MAR is ours...and we lost that match :ahh:
Thank you Ether for posting all this data. |
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
Would it be possible to report on winning match scores only?
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
Quote:
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
Yes. Histogram and ogive. It's interesting to put the data for all the alliances and just the winning alliance scores on the same graph.
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
Quote:
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
Quote:
If it were my car, I'd just put a tire iron on it and find out. But it's my daughter's car... |
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
GM had a few years where the plastic lugnuts screwed onto the real ones underneath. Try a soft set of vise grips to unscrew the plastic ones. Is there a lugnut key in the glove box somewhere, too?
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
Quote:
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
Well I followed Step6 and broke the plastic nut off. Underneath it was what looked for all the world like another plastic nut. Life was a lot simpler with my 67 Impala, 68 Camaro, and 72 LeMans. |
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
I'm curious, what was the high score for all matches?
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
2 Attachment(s)
Todd, is this what you had in mind? I can change it if not. |
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
I had in mind "wins" and "all".
You will see why in a day or so... |
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
Quote:
Do you want the Y axis to be a percentage or a number of scores? |
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
Code:
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
"all" = "wins+losses+ties"
Y axis to be a percentage |
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
Quote:
1) all/all, and wins/wins, or 2) all/all, and wins/all ? |
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
Crossroads seemed to be a high scoring event, especially elims.
Can you add it to the histogram with the few other events? |
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
Quote:
Just out of curiosity, what software tool are you using? I just had a class in mathcad, and am developing a tool to predict match scores. I'm using your data from this year to check it. |
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
Quote:
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Quote:
RLaB or Delphi: all the linear algebra stuff for least squares (e.g. OPR etc) Excel and/or gnuplot: charts & graphs Quote:
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
Quote:
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
One more refinement... Can you change the units on the histogram from percent to number of matches?
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
Quote:
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
Lovely. Thanks.
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
To make the ogive graph from post #35 even more interesting, could you add the (L+T) ogive?
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
Does anyone have the Qual Match Results data for 2012 or earlier years in a delimited, fixed-field, or CSV text file? I've had a request to post some comparative graphs for previous years but I don't have the data handy. |
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
Do you mind making a championship version of this? I'd like to see how much champs is better than this. Thanks!
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Attached is an ogive of CMP vs MSC for comparison. |
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
Quote:
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
What software do you use to make these graphs?
|
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
How about the events in Texas-Louisiana vs. MSC and overall
Alamo Bayou Dallas Hub City Lone Star |
Re: Alliance Scores Histogram
Am I reading this that MSC was at the 50% level 30 points per alliance higher than the Championship? At the 90% it was almost 20 points higher?
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 17:02. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi