![]() |
Re: 2013 Championship Newton Division
Quote:
|
Re: 2013 Championship Newton Division
Quote:
Match scores are based on Ed Law's Max OPR data for each team and Ether's world Auto/Climb/Teleop OPR data (linearly scaled to match Ed's Max OPR values). This gives 10 sets of qualification rankings, one for each of the simulated schedules. Here's a summary of each team's average, best, worst and "in top 8" rankings across those 10 schedules: Code:
Team Rank Best Worst Top8?Picking the most extreme examples, team 341 would rank either 3rd or last, based purely on their randomly chosen alliance partners and opponents. So I think we can conclude that there is a fairly high degree of scheduling luck, just as we expected. |
Re: 2013 Championship Newton Division
Quote:
Of course the basic underlying assumption (every team scores exactly "OPR" points each match) is fundamentally flawed, but that doesn't dilute the importance of schedule. |
Re: 2013 Championship Newton Division
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: 2013 Championship Newton Division
Quote:
|
Re: 2013 Championship Newton Division
Quote:
I would expect 1986 to at the very least "make some noise here" :rolleyes: I picked you guys with the 2nd pick in my fantasy league so I hope you pan out for me! |
Re: 2013 Championship Newton Division
So 1986 seeded in the top 10 7 out of 10 times, yet not even close in the prelim schedule (all OPR based and every one guaranteed to be wrong).
Man, that's a tough schedule. |
Re: 2013 Championship Newton Division
Quote:
|
Re: 2013 Championship Newton Division
Quote:
Code:
Avg Med Mode Min Max StDev Top8 #1Code:
Avg Med Mode Min Max StDev |
Re: 2013 Championship Newton Division
As expected that almost exactly mirrors OPR.
|
Re: 2013 Championship Newton Division
Quote:
|
Re: 2013 Championship Newton Division
Quote:
|
Re: 2013 Championship Newton Division
Quote:
At the old Maryland State Fair Robotics Competition, the schedule was created by hand. So, when a team did not show up for the event, there was no time to re-run the entire schedule for obvious reasons. It turned out that a team did not show up at all, but was still counted as a partner in the scheduled matches. If they were your partner you played 1 against 2 for that match. At the end of day one, after about 8 or 9 matches, the missing team was in 4th place. When that happened, I brought my whole team over to see the standings. It was very instructive as to how a favorable schedule can boost a team into the top 8. Just thought I would share. :) |
Re: 2013 Championship Newton Division
From the 100 schedule data, the standard deviation in rank was used to calculated the 95% rank and determine the outliers. There were 6 outliers. No one has a 3 sigma outlier schedule.
2389 has an easy schedule. Their average rank is 75 with a standard deviation of 18, but predicted rank is 36. Here are the 6 teams with outlier schedules Code:
Avg StDev Actual |
Re: 2013 Championship Newton Division
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:15. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi