Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Championship Event (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Archimedes 2013!!! (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=116165)

Grim Tuesday 22-04-2013 14:58

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nikeairmancurry (Post 1266327)
I'll go about 81% correct. OPR calculations hover around that number.

OPR predictions are generally 81% correct within an event. With the number of improvements teams make between the regional and championship, I think it will sway close matches significantly.

Also, if 3314 seeds first, prepare yourselves for some scorched earth.

EricDrost 22-04-2013 15:10

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Grim Tuesday (Post 1266355)
Also, if 3314 seeds first, prepare yourselves for some scorched earth.

I'd expect scorching from any team (barring maybe 868 and 126) that seeds first and doesn't have a >3 disc auton.

Link07 22-04-2013 15:14

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by EricDrost (Post 1266371)
I'd expect scorching from any team (barring maybe 868 and 126) that seeds first and doesn't have a >3 disc auton.

Inb4 11 and 3314 actually DO go 8-0

EricDrost 22-04-2013 15:16

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Link07 (Post 1266375)
Inb4 11 and 3314 actually DO go 8-0

I highly doubt either of us will go 8-0. I see 33 and 469 having the best chance at 1st seed.

JohnSchneider 22-04-2013 15:22

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by EricDrost (Post 1266371)
I'd expect scorching from any team (barring maybe 868 and 126) that seeds first and doesn't have a >3 disc auton.

Scorching would make this division VERY interesting.

M.O'Reilly 22-04-2013 15:23

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Unfortunately, I think performance this year depends greatly on match schedule (more so than years past).

3314 is a great shooter. The won the Bridgewater district as the #1 seed, but then they were on the outside of elims at MARC for who knows what reason. I can't explain that, except for poor luck of the draw at MARC.

Drawing from MARC, alliances that succeeded in elims did not focus on defense whatsoever. The only dedicated defenders were to block full court shooters, and it was extremely effective. I think an FCS that can't get under the pyramid even making elims is far fetched. It's too easy to stop.

If I had a 3 disc autonomous mode, I wouldn't trade it to stop the opposing alliance from getting an extra two discs on the center line. Perhaps after you shoot, but certainly not before.

Tom Ore 22-04-2013 16:07

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
A journalism student traveled with our team to the 10,000 Lakes regional. Here is the video she made.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYHmgSzLcHU

Link07 22-04-2013 16:30

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by M.O'Reilly (Post 1266383)
Unfortunately, I think performance this year depends greatly on match schedule (more so than years past).

3314 is a great shooter. The won the Bridgewater district as the #1 seed, but then they were on the outside of elims at MARC for who knows what reason. I can't explain that, except for poor luck of the draw at MARC.

Not to take anything away from them(they did almost win two events), but 3314 also had a fairly easy schedule at Bridgewater, IIRC.

k20002222 22-04-2013 16:38

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by M.O'Reilly (Post 1266383)
Unfortunately, I think performance this year depends greatly on match schedule (more so than years past).

3314 is a great shooter. The won the Bridgewater district as the #1 seed, but then they were on the outside of elims at MARC for who knows what reason. I can't explain that, except for poor luck of the draw at MARC.

Drawing from MARC, alliances that succeeded in elims did not focus on defense whatsoever. The only dedicated defenders were to block full court shooters, and it was extremely effective. I think an FCS that can't get under the pyramid even making elims is far fetched. It's too easy to stop.

If I had a 3 disc autonomous mode, I wouldn't trade it to stop the opposing alliance from getting an extra two discs on the center line. Perhaps after you shoot, but certainly not before.

...

Chris Hibner 22-04-2013 16:38

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Grim Tuesday (Post 1266355)
OPR predictions are generally 81% correct within an event. With the number of improvements teams make between the regional and championship, I think it will sway close matches significantly.

Using OPR from each team's best district event, OPR predictions were 82.4% accurate for MSC.

I think it will probably be right around 80% for CMP as well.

efoote868 22-04-2013 16:43

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nikeairmancurry (Post 1266327)
I'll go about 81% correct. OPR calculations hover around that number.

As pointed out earlier that's within an event, using all match data to recalculate and fit what would've happened if OPR was 100% accurate.

Also, I would like to point out that OPR predictions using Friday's match data to predict Saturday performance at Crossroads was 16 for 24 (or 25 if you count ties being wrong), and Crossroads had a significantly higher average OPR than most other regional competitions, similar to what Archimedes is predicted to have.

M.O'Reilly 22-04-2013 17:36

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Link07 (Post 1266413)
Not to take anything away from them(they did almost win two events), but 3314 also had a fairly easy schedule at Bridgewater, IIRC.

That may be, but I think it speaks volumes about the style of game this year. With 100 teams and 8 matches it's going to be a dog fight to get in the top8, and EVERY autonomous shot matters. The 6-7 fantastic robots you see in this division may not have their fate in their own hands; that's up to the match schedule gods.

stephenmcd71 22-04-2013 17:44

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by efoote868 (Post 1266323)
Anyone want to guess the % of correct predictions at the end? I'm going to say it'll be about 65%.

Im hoping there wrong too.. and I would say around 75%

Kevin Leonard 22-04-2013 17:49

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
This division just got WAY less predictable. I think if a non-favorite team seeds first (i.e. 3314 or 11 like the spreadsheet says) the field becomes wide open for some very interesting alliance selections. I expect multiple declines and potentially some powerful low seed alliances.

brennonbrimhall 22-04-2013 17:57

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Ross (Post 1266271)
I used the preliminary match schedules to simulate the matches using OPR and then calculate the standings. I used each team's best OPR from Ed Law's spreadsheet for calculating their contribution to a match. I also used each team's world Auto, Teleop, and Climb OPR from Ed Law's spreadsheet for calculating the rest of the standings.

Don't like the predictions? Go out and prove them wrong :)

Is there a particular reason you used OPR and not CCWM?

stephenmcd71 22-04-2013 18:10

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
With the preliminary schedule and the results that came with that I think every division is gonna have a fun, exciting, and down to the wire finals. I wish everyone good luck and safe travels on there way to St. Louis

Joe Ross 22-04-2013 19:46

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by brennonbrimhall (Post 1266459)
Is there a particular reason you used OPR and not CCWM?

I wanted match scores that could be used to calculate reasonable rankings. Since CCWM is related to winning margin and not match scores, it wouldn't have been as useful. I've seen lots of people look at the accuracy of OPR predictions, but haven't for CCWM predictions. If someone has data that shows that CCWM predictions are more accurate, I might consider doing it for next year.

A slightly better way to get match scores would have been to add the alliance's OPRs and subtract their opponents DPRs, but that's a lot more work.

cmrnpizzo14 22-04-2013 21:50

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by the.miler (Post 1266078)
In addition to our shooting game, no ceilings can hold us now! Team 846 has gotten the climb working, and we are continuing to work right now to shave precious seconds off it.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ls-stEVTN8

The next step is the same geometry, but we're not climbing for 30 on that test pyramid. We'll see what we can do on the field :)

Look out for our flashlight, improved shooting, floor pickup, and climbing game on the Archimedes field!


3173 will be keeping an eye on you guys at our end of season party this week!! Good luck to our captains from Boston, we hope that you guys have better luck at this competition!

Also, we felt bad that you did not have enough buttons to give you guys at the end of Boston, if you can tell us a way to send them to you we could mail them or something before CMP. And our head programmer picked you guys in our Fantasy FIRST draft last night ;)

Allen B. 22-04-2013 22:15

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AdamHeard (Post 1264875)
973 won't jump in on the collab'd scouting at event, but we'd love to share in the picture hunt.

We have 80+ teams already, probably 30-40 of which could be better quality. I'm leaving for a trip now, but our scouts will take over from here and post an updated list of teams soon. Maybe even dump the current pictures in a publically available spot for everyone.


Here is a link to 973's collection of pictures; We are still looking for a few more.

JohnSchneider 22-04-2013 22:32

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Allen B. (Post 1266608)
Here is a link to 973's collection of pictures; We are still looking for a few more.

Thanks a bunch for this.

Is there any way to put it in numerical order :o its a bit hard to use currently :(

Allen B. 22-04-2013 22:41

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by animenerdjohn (Post 1266614)
Thanks a bunch for this.

Is there any way to put it in numerical order :o its a bit hard to use currently :(

We've had some fun with that as well.. unfortunately the pictures have to be saved with the team number as the file name for our system. They are ordered by google drive numerically but strangely not sequentially. So as you look for teams they will be grouped together by numbers from left to right. Hope that helps

Kevin Leonard 22-04-2013 22:43

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
3478's picture is of their last year's robot.
And you can just Ctrl+F to find the team you want to find.

EDIT: There's also no picture of 3314

Ken Streeter 22-04-2013 22:52

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Allen B. (Post 1266608)
Here is a link to 973's collection of pictures; We are still looking for a few more.

Attached is a little better photo of 1519's robot as of the North Carolina Regional.

However, our robot, "Discobolus Rex," will hopefully look fairly different by Thursday at CMP. Using 27.0 pounds of our 30.0 pound fabricated parts allowance, we have a lot planned for Wednesday night in order to hopefully increase our OPR from the 64.1 we achieved at NCR to even more at CMP...

By an hour after the pits open on Wednesday night, we hope to have reduced the robot we pull out of the bag to nothing but a drive base! Then, we plan to mount a whole new upper frame with a revised more-accurate shooter. We'll then disassemble the old 30-point climber (we never actually managed to get above the 10-point level in a competition match, although we had it mostly working with essential human assistance on the practice field) and re-assemble it in a different configuration and a new movable carriage to re-make it into a 10-point quick-hanger. We'll also move the battery from the front of the robot to the back and accordingly move the main breaker.

We'll try to remember to get photos at opportune times -- looks like it will be a busy night!

Ken Streeter 22-04-2013 22:53

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Allen B. (Post 1266617)
We've had some fun with that as well.. unfortunately the pictures have to be saved with the team number as the file name for our system. They are ordered by google drive numerically but strangely not sequentially. So as you look for teams they will be grouped together by numbers from left to right. Hope that helps

If you change the filenames of short-numbered teams to use leading zeros so that all numbers have four digits, you may able to fix that. (e.g. 0011.jpg or 0126.jpg)

Allen B. 22-04-2013 23:12

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Thanks for the responses. We are still looking for 13 pictures:
321
433
1448
1660
1756
2081
2408
2457
3008
3314
3478
4067
4553
If anyone finds any other teams with outdated/incorrect pictures, please let us know and we will try to get it updated. If there are better pictures out there send us a link and we'll get them in.

Akash Rastogi 22-04-2013 23:14

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Allen B. (Post 1266636)
Thanks for the responses. We are still looking for 13 pictures:
321
433
1448
1660
1756
2081
2408
2457
3008
3314
3478
4067
4553
If anyone finds any other teams with outdated/incorrect pictures, please let us know and we will try to get it updated. If there are better pictures out there send us a link and we'll get them in.

http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...89&postcount=8

Adamc4 22-04-2013 23:51

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Not gonna lie, I'm pretty excited for Match 19... :D so many good teams around, it's a great experience for our North Idaho team

AdamHeard 23-04-2013 00:43

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Streeter (Post 1266628)
If you change the filenames of short-numbered teams to use leading zeros so that all numbers have four digits, you may able to fix that. (e.g. 0011.jpg or 0126.jpg)

The leading zero problem doesn't affect our scouting system at all. We pull pics by function of team #, and the team's are numbered in our system w/o leading zeroes obviously. If we changed to leading zero, we'd have to also change this logic.

So, sorry guys; No renumbering in our gdoc folder, but feel free to take the pics and do whatever you want with them.

tim-tim 23-04-2013 06:48

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
1 Attachment(s)
I have attached a better picture of 836 to this post.

Note that we are using some of our 30lb allowance to rework the shooter to prevent the jamming issue that plagued us for so long.

Can't wait to see all the robots.

Jimmy Cao 23-04-2013 15:51

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Seeing http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...&postcount=136 made me curious who had the "easy" or "hard" schedules in Archimedes. Using the same analysis method, with one minor change*, I generated the following list:

Code:

Team Difficulty Rank
3627        -51        1
4810        39        2
1756        74        3
1610        79        4
1595        81        5
1747        125        6
2457        132        7
3504        146        8
2614        156        9
801        165        10
639        200        11
4499        201        12
4265        206        13
2590        208        14
172        234        15
2705        238        16
326        247        17
930        249        18
469        249        18
4466        251        20
78        253        21
433        270        22
2081        272        23
4501        274        24
2604        278        25
1660        285        26
20        288        27
1011        293        28
4471        298        29
254        299        30
812        305        31
1334        307        32
4537        313        33
379        320        34
291        326        35
71        330        36
3003        332        37
2165        334        38
4067        336        39
973        348        40
2704        349        41
1448        352        42
321        358        43
2408        358        43
4731        373        45
3044        376        46
3478        385        47
846        387        48
3245        388        49
910        389        50
2137        391        51
3145        395        52
840        399        53
525        404        54
1071        408        55
51        409        56
694        424        57
2959        425        58
868        429        59
1714        431        60
2709        436        61
3467        450        62
314        451        63
1967        455        64
236        455        64
2016        455        64
1902        456        67
1796        465        68
1075        467        69
1519        470        70
1868        472        71
948        473        72
126        477        73
11        482        74
836        484        75
4637        498        76
4585        503        77
3310        508        78
2468        529        79
3242        543        80
4470        547        81
33        567        82
4673        581        83
2486        584        84
2415        584        84
955        597        86
1100        610        87
4545        622        88
4589        648        89
3612        656        90
987        668        91
4753        675        92
316        691        93
1836        713        94
4450        737        95
701        755        96
3008        773        97
365        776        98
3314        787        99

*Instead of ranking teams by OPR 1-99, I ranked them by OPR if the team itself was removed from the division 1-98. I think this prevents the average result of a large number of samples from breaking down into a strictly OPR based list.

In no way do I think this is a very good way of ranking match difficulties, but it was rather easy to do.

Grim Tuesday 23-04-2013 16:03

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Well I'm glad we have the, uh, honor of having the 11th most difficult schedule in the division. Let's hope the scouts are watching closely!

dodar 23-04-2013 16:08

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lostmage333 (Post 1266832)
Seeing http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...&postcount=136 made me curious who had the "easy" or "hard" schedules in Archimedes. Using the same analysis method, with one minor change*, I generated the following list:

Code:

Team Difficulty Rank
3627        -51        1
4810        39        2
1756        74        3
1610        79        4
1595        81        5
1747        125        6
2457        132        7
3504        146        8
2614        156        9
801        165        10
639        200        11
4499        201        12
4265        206        13
2590        208        14
172        234        15
2705        238        16
326        247        17
930        249        18
469        249        18
4466        251        20
78        253        21
433        270        22
2081        272        23
4501        274        24
2604        278        25
1660        285        26
20        288        27
1011        293        28
4471        298        29
254        299        30
812        305        31
1334        307        32
4537        313        33
379        320        34
291        326        35
71        330        36
3003        332        37
2165        334        38
4067        336        39
973        348        40
2704        349        41
1448        352        42
321        358        43
2408        358        43
4731        373        45
3044        376        46
3478        385        47
846        387        48
3245        388        49
910        389        50
2137        391        51
3145        395        52
840        399        53
525        404        54
1071        408        55
51        409        56
694        424        57
2959        425        58
868        429        59
1714        431        60
2709        436        61
3467        450        62
314        451        63
1967        455        64
236        455        64
2016        455        64
1902        456        67
1796        465        68
1075        467        69
1519        470        70
1868        472        71
948        473        72
126        477        73
11        482        74
836        484        75
4637        498        76
4585        503        77
3310        508        78
2468        529        79
3242        543        80
4470        547        81
33        567        82
4673        581        83
2486        584        84
2415        584        84
955        597        86
1100        610        87
4545        622        88
4589        648        89
3612        656        90
987        668        91
4753        675        92
316        691        93
1836        713        94
4450        737        95
701        755        96
3008        773        97
365        776        98
3314        787        99

*Instead of ranking teams by OPR 1-99, I ranked them by OPR if the team itself was removed from the division 1-98. I think this prevents the average result of a large number of samples from breaking down into a strictly OPR based list.

In no way do I think this is a very good way of ranking match difficulties, but it was rather easy to do.

So the lower the number, the tougher the division schedule becomes? I am kind of confused to what you actually did.

efoote868 23-04-2013 16:14

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dodar (Post 1266859)
So the lower the number, the tougher the division schedule becomes? I am kind of confused to what you actually did.

If I understand the original model,
Code:

For each team
  For each match
    Add opponents ranks to current team's difficulty of schedule
    Subtract alliance ranks from current team's difficulty of schedule

Rank team's difficulty of schedule in ascending order.

In this model,

For each team
  Rerank teams without current team
  For each match
    Add opponents ranks to current team's difficulty of schedule
    Subtract alliance ranks from current team's difficulty of schedule

Rank team's difficulty of schedule in ascending order.


dodar 23-04-2013 16:18

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by efoote868 (Post 1266862)
If I understand the original model,
Code:

For each team
  For each match
    Add opponents ranks to current team's difficulty of schedule
    Subtract alliance ranks from current team's difficulty of schedule

Rank team's difficulty of schedule in ascending order.

In this model,

For each team
  Rerank teams without current team
  For each match
    Add opponents ranks to current team's difficulty of schedule
    Subtract alliance ranks from current team's difficulty of schedule

Rank team's difficulty of schedule in ascending order.


So the lower the number means that team has a higher SOS?

efoote868 23-04-2013 16:26

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Yes.

Jimmy Cao 23-04-2013 16:51

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by efoote868 (Post 1266862)
If I understand the original model,
Code:

For each team
  For each match
    Add opponents ranks to current team's difficulty of schedule
    Subtract alliance ranks from current team's difficulty of schedule

Rank team's difficulty of schedule in ascending order.

In this model,

For each team
  Rerank teams without current team
  For each match
    Add opponents ranks to current team's difficulty of schedule
    Subtract alliance ranks from current team's difficulty of schedule

Rank team's difficulty of schedule in ascending order.


Yes, this is correct. However it's still important to realize that this approach has numerous shortcomings.

As an extreme, place the #1, 2, and 3 teams against #97, 98, 99.
The #1, 2, 3 teams would each get a huge boost to their result, making it seem like an easier schedule, whereas #97, 98, and 99 seem to have very hard schedules. But this is only for 1 match, and this 1 match will have a disproportional impact on the final ranking (it might account for well over half the "points", while it only accounts for 1/12 of the final seeding).

The Lucas 24-04-2013 11:19

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmy Cao (Post 1266832)
Seeinghttp://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...&postcount=136 made me curious who had the "easy" or "hard" schedules in Archimedes. Using the same analysis method, with one minor change*, I generated the following list:

Code:

Team Difficulty Rank
3627        -51        1
4810        39        2
1756        74        3
1610        79        4
1595        81        5
1747        125        6
2457        132        7
3504        146        8
2614        156        9
801        165        10
639        200        11
4499        201        12
4265        206        13
2590        208        14
172        234        15
2705        238        16
326        247        17
930        249        18
469        249        18
4466        251        20
78        253        21
433        270        22
2081        272        23
4501        274        24
2604        278        25
1660        285        26
20        288        27
1011        293        28
4471        298        29
254        299        30
812        305        31
1334        307        32
4537        313        33
379        320        34
291        326        35
71        330        36
3003        332        37
2165        334        38
4067        336        39
973        348        40
2704        349        41
1448        352        42
321        358        43
2408        358        43
4731        373        45
3044        376        46
3478        385        47
846        387        48
3245        388        49
910        389        50
2137        391        51
3145        395        52
840        399        53
525        404        54
1071        408        55
51        409        56
694        424        57
2959        425        58
868        429        59
1714        431        60
2709        436        61
3467        450        62
314        451        63
1967        455        64
236        455        64
2016        455        64
1902        456        67
1796        465        68
1075        467        69
1519        470        70
1868        472        71
948        473        72
126        477        73
11        482        74
836        484        75
4637        498        76
4585        503        77
3310        508        78
2468        529        79
3242        543        80
4470        547        81
33        567        82
4673        581        83
2486        584        84
2415        584        84
955        597        86
1100        610        87
4545        622        88
4589        648        89
3612        656        90
987        668        91
4753        675        92
316        691        93
1836        713        94
4450        737        95
701        755        96
3008        773        97
365        776        98
3314        787        99

*Instead of ranking teams by OPR 1-99, I ranked them by OPR if the team itself was removed from the division 1-98. I think this prevents the average result of a large number of samples from breaking down into a strictly OPR based list.

In no way do I think this is a very good way of ranking match difficulties, but it was rather easy to do.

Did you remove surrogate matches from your calculations?
If not I think you need to remove the third match of 433, 930, 987, & 3044

Jimmy Cao 24-04-2013 11:34

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Lucas (Post 1267133)
Did you remove surrogate matches from your calculations?
If not I think you need to remove the third match of 433, 930, 987, & 3044

I forgot about those. Corrected results are below, after removing those 4 surrogate matches. As before, lower number in "difficulty" column = harder schedule.

Code:

Team        Difficulty Rank
3627        -51        1
4810        39        2
1756        74        3
1610        79        4
1595        81        5
1747        125        6
2457        132        7
3504        146        8
2614        156        9
801        165        10
433        187        11
639        200        12
4499        201        13
4265        206        14
2590        208        15
930        222        16
172        234        17
2705        238        18
326        247        19
469        249        20
4466        251        21
78        253        22
2081        272        23
4501        274        24
2604        278        25
1660        285        26
20        288        27
1011        293        28
4471        298        29
254        299        30
812        305        31
1334        307        32
4537        313        33
379        320        34
3044        322        35
291        326        36
71        330        37
3003        332        38
2165        334        39
4067        336        40
973        348        41
2704        349        42
1448        352        43
321        358        44
2408        358        44
4731        373        46
3478        385        47
846        387        48
3245        388        49
910        389        50
2137        391        51
3145        395        52
840        399        53
525        404        54
1071        408        55
51        409        56
694        424        57
2959        425        58
868        429        59
1714        431        60
2709        436        61
3467        450        62
314        451        63
1967        455        64
236        455        64
2016        455        64
1902        456        67
1796        465        68
1075        467        69
1519        470        70
1868        472        71
948        473        72
126        477        73
11        482        74
836        484        75
4637        498        76
4585        503        77
3310        508        78
2468        529        79
3242        543        80
4470        547        81
33        567        82
4673        581        83
2486        584        84
2415        584        84
955        597        86
1100        610        87
4545        622        88
4589        648        89
987        648        89
3612        656        91
4753        675        92
316        691        93
1836        713        94
4450        737        95
701        755        96
3008        773        97
365        776        98
3314        787        99


martin417 25-04-2013 14:18

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Looks like all the other fields have the match schedule and results up, but not Archi. What's up with that?

bduddy 25-04-2013 14:21

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Looks fine to me...

http://www2.usfirst.org/2013comp/eve...chresults.html

martin417 25-04-2013 14:27

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bduddy (Post 1267395)

Dang cache!

I had to do a shift-reload to get it.

dodar 25-04-2013 14:32

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Spyder has everything updating too.

mdituri 27-04-2013 08:30

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
rest assured, we did not go undefeated so we will not have the opportunity to be turned down by many teams. and while destroying the ability for the best of the best to be together may be some people's style, as a second pick worthy robot, we understand our limitations and do pure best to help our alliance win every match. we are certainly not going on the fieldand doing nothing. and as many of the MAR teams that I respect know, we would rather play against three good robots in the finale than screw alliance selection. we want to see Archimedes to win Einstein, maybe with a MAR bot in the alliance.
On a side note, thank you to 2016, the Mighty Monkey Wrenches for saving us when we had the perfect storm of disasters happen on the way to st Louis which had us finally arriving at the dome around noon on Thursday instead of Wednesday by seven. School bus accident. cancelled them delayed flight, missed connection, forced to spend the night in Charlotte rather than st Louis, and delayed a.m. flight. my team is thankful we are even herer to compete this weekend. thank you 2016 for putting up our Egyptian pit. fixing our bent axles. and being an amazing team. they might be ranked low, but I hope you have them on your radar. maybe someone will have enough confidence in 3314 to choose us for our reliable autonomous, three cycles, ten point hang, and our 80 prior matches of experience this season. Good luck to everyone on Archimedes.

bam-bam 27-04-2013 09:48

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Match 120

1075-987-2415 Red
33-1610-2543 Blue

211-85, Red

2415 cements #1 position.

mdituri 27-04-2013 10:21

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
congrats wiredcats. well deserved!

Jon K. 28-04-2013 22:27

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Congrats to all the teams in Archimedes!!! It was an amazing weekend to be on the field, and to be able to watch such high caliber teams was truly an awe inspiring event for me personally. I was privileged to have been able to be a part of your referee crew on Archi!!! That being sad, I am hoping the FIRST community here on Chief Delphi can assist me in looking for my WALL-E figure. He went missing from the Archimedes field on Saturday and I am trying to find him. My sister bought him for me a few years ago, and they no longer produce/sell them. I have taken him to numerous events over the past few years, and have a whole facebook album devoted to him and these pictures. I am saddened that I will not be able to continue this album, and many of my friends were upset about this as well. It has brought a lot of joy to many people both in and out of FIRST to see the picture updates. Attached is the last picture I have of him from the Archimedes field. If you could please ask your teammates to see if anyone may have accidentally taken him I would appreciate it!!!




twetherbee 01-05-2013 12:21

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
First off, I had a great time at the Championships as did our entire team. The Archimedes Division did not disappoint this year. I always enjoy meeting and working with new teams each year, such as 33, 469, 291, 1714, 694, 868, 2590, 948 and seeing old friends like 51, 71, 254, 365, 525, 973, 1902, and 3245. I wish the Championships were a few days longer so we could get to know more, but I guess that will have to wait until next year now.

I want to thank our Alliance Captain, Team 2415, for choosing us to be a part of the #1 seed. Going undefeated at the Championships is never easy and you guys earned the #1 seed with your solid robot and game play. We have still never gone undefeated during qualifications at the Championships after coming so close with one loss in 2006, 2008, 2012, and now 2013. (This year's loss is going to sting for a while.)

I also want to thank our other great Alliance Partner, Team 2959. You guys were such a great scoring machine (worthy of a 1st pick) that I was shocked that our Alliance was able to steal you at the end. A great undervalued Michigan team that was a pleasure to work with this year.

Congratulations to Teams 33, 469, and 1519 for winning the Archimedes Division. The finals matches were incredible and all six teams left everything out on the table. I wouldn't want to win or lose any other way. We were pulling for you all the way through Einstein.

Congrats to the Archimedes Teams for their Championship Awards:

254 Industrial Design Award
1902 Imagery Award
33 Quality Award
3478 Engineering Inspiration
2614 Entrepreneurship Award

And again, we were sorry to Team Crush for the hit in Match 2. I don't think we could recreate that if we tried, but at least it is a video clip that we'll both be remembered by for a while. As Greg mentioned in another post, they were next to us in the pit and were gracious enough to give us use some of the glue/solvent, with which they repaired their robot after Match 2, later in the day after we cracked a part of our intake chute. Great team from our neck of the woods (or desert).

Good luck to all of the teams in the offseason. See you at IRI or next year!!

Now back to work....

Ken Streeter 01-05-2013 14:21

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
This message is simply to thank the many teams on the Archimedes field that made the 2013 Championships an unforgettable day for everybody on 1519. This will probably be a "tl;dr" for many of you, but we'd like to thank you anyway!

During the first three days of the event, there were countless teams that helped us in various ways. We thank all of the teams that tolerated our rudeness on Wednesday night when we shooed you away so that we could completely rebuild the top half of our robot with a different climber and improved shooter. (This might be the best thing about the Wednesday night pit time - uninterrupted time to work on the robot!) On Friday, we could not have repaired our shooter without the encoder MARS 2614 generously gave us, and the Red Devils 1334 repeatedly helped us out with things like thread taps, talcum powder, and encouragement. Other teams made space for us on the informal practice field to test full court shooting, and yet others provided stories of what tricks or techniques worked for them when making the long shots. Please know that you were each some of the many teams in FIRST that helped us this season and you deserve a portion of the credit for any recognition we received. Thanks!

During the qualification matches, our partners were generally fantastic in the strategy sessions, demonstrating the gracious professionalism of FIRST by being willing to set aside their own interests in showcasing their robot or simply doing what they wanted to do, but rather collectively working with us to come up with an alliance strategy that was in the best interest of winning of the match, even if it meant we or they would be playing lowly defense instead of high-profile shooting. Sometimes key, timely, penalty-free defense is the key to winning a match!

For 1519, though, this posting couldn't be complete without a big THANKS to our alliance partners, The Killer Bees (33) and Las Guerrillas (469)! We're especially thankful to the scouting and strategy folks on 33 who saw the potential in our robot and team to bring some significant capabilities and unique diversity to complete the 33/469/1519 alliance, despite our rather mediocre 50th place ranking in Archimedes and our 4-4 record. We made some significant improvements on Friday evening / Saturday morning which were demonstrated in our only Saturday morning qualification match. Before 33 picked us, we were concerned that we may be packing up our pit in a few minutes. Instead, our robotics team had the most incredible ride of our 9 years to date! However, we wouldn't have experienced any of it without 33 and 469 leading our alliance. We're thankful to have had the opportunity to play in the big show, with all of the FRC world watching.

The whole concluding day of the 2013 FRC Championships is a day I'll surely never forget. Thanks to 33 and 469 for inviting us to share the magic with them. We'd love to be allied with either of your teams again some day; I can only hope that your teams both feel the same. Thank you!

We'd also like to extend our congratulations to Team 3467, Windham Windup, of New Hampshire for winning the only judged award for veteran teams on the Archimedes division. Your robot transformation at the Pine Tree Regional was part of the inspiration that we could do a complete upper robot rebuild at the Championship event. It was definitely worth it!

There are a few other non-Archimedes teams that deserve our thanks, too: Without Team 435, The Robodogs, picking us at NCR, we might not have been in St. Louis at all! Back home in New Hampshire, we would have had little chance to develop the FCS in the first place without the practice field space of 1512, the Metal Vidsters, of St. Paul's School.

Thank you all!

Akash Rastogi 04-05-2013 19:42

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Sorry to bring this back up, but does anyone have video of 254's quarterfinal matches? All I found video of was 1519's matches.

JohnSchneider 04-05-2013 20:18

Re: Archimedes 2013!!!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Akash Rastogi (Post 1272330)
Sorry to bring this back up, but does anyone have video of 254's quarterfinal matches? All I found video of was 1519's matches.

http://www.youtube.com/user/RobotBillMD?feature=watch has all of archimedes I think (although from a weird angle)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 18:14.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi