Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   **FIRST EMAIL**/ Good, But Should Be Better (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=116558)

Mr V 30-04-2013 12:32

A Message from Bob Tuttle
 
I just recieved this message and thought I'd share a snipit of it with CD.


Quote:

We just wrapped up a great Championship 2013; but there is still room for improvement.

Other than some early FTC communications issues and a common Team Finale problem, the 2013 Championship went well for the Jr.FLL, FLL, and FTC participants.
However, the vast majority of participants in St. Louis are FRC participants and there were some disappointments for them. They felt they did not get to play enough and some also felt that limited seeding matches led to ambiguous seeding results. Some others were disappointed with imprecise real-time scoring. And all four programs were let down by a too-long Closing Ceremony and a too-crowded and delayed Team Finale. (The rain shut down a major venue and resulted in under-estimated interior crowding.)

To address the concerns of our FIRST Community:

· FIRST will work hard to increase FRC seeding rounds by at least 25%;
· FIRST will reconfigure the Closing Ceremony to be more efficient and end sooner; and
· FIRST will change the Team Finale, targeting a much better result.

FRC had a wonderful game this year. Kudos to the FRC Game Design Committee!

Moriarty 30-04-2013 12:38

Re: A Message from Bob Tuttle
 
Quote:

FIRST will work hard to increase FRC seeding rounds by at least 25%;
At least 10 matches? That sounds amazing, but I am interested in how they will accomplish this. Looking forward to the solution.

EDIT: Corrected my dumb math mistake to prevent confusion for future thread readers

Mr V 30-04-2013 12:41

Re: A Message from Bob Tuttle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Moriarty (Post 1270049)
At least 12 matches? That sounds amazing, but I am interested in how they will accomplish this. Looking forward to the solution.

My math says 25% of 8 is 2 which would mean 10 matches.

Jeffy 30-04-2013 12:44

Re: A Message from Bob Tuttle
 
I like this a lot. FIRST seems to be continuously striving to better the program. Very inspiring.

Nuttyman54 30-04-2013 14:59

Re: A Message from Bob Tuttle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr V (Post 1270054)
My math says 25% of 8 is 2 which would mean 10 matches.

Still great. A few years ago they vowed to give a minimum of 10 matches, which prompted the move to starting qualification matches on Thursday. I'm glad to see an effort to get this back.

The other points are also good. Shorter closing ceremonies are long overdue

MechEng83 30-04-2013 14:59

**FIRST EMAIL**/ Good, But Should Be Better
 
Quote:

The FIRST® Community:



We just completed another strong season for all four of the programs at FIRST: Junior FIRST LEGO® League® (Jr.FLL®), FIRST® LEGO® League (FLL®), FIRST® Tech Challenge (FTC®), and FIRST® Robotics Competition (FRC®). All programs experienced strong growth, with FTC and FLL leading the way.



We just wrapped up a great Championship 2013; but there is still room for improvement.



Other than some early FTC communications issues and a common Team Finale problem, the 2013 Championship went well for the Jr.FLL, FLL, and FTC participants. However, the vast majority of participants in St. Louis are FRC participants and there were some disappointments for them. They felt they did not get to play enough and some also felt that limited seeding matches led to ambiguous seeding results. Some others were disappointed with imprecise real-time scoring. And all four programs were let down by a too-long Closing Ceremony and a too-crowded and delayed Team Finale. (The rain shut down a major venue and resulted in under-estimated interior crowding.)



To address the concerns of our FIRST Community:



· FIRST will work hard to increase FRC seeding rounds by at least 25%;
· FIRST will reconfigure the Closing Ceremony to be more efficient and end sooner; and
· FIRST will change the Team Finale, targeting a much better result.


FRC had a wonderful game this year. Kudos to the FRC Game Design Committee!



All programs had strong seasons with good team satisfaction and team growth. However, the season ending could have been better. As the Closing Ceremony dragged on too long, I was inspired by the sustained enthusiasm generated by all the participants. FIRST owes you better solutions to the issues I mentioned and FIRST will respond.



Thanks to all the team members, Mentors, Volunteers, and Sponsors; YOU WERE GREAT!



Bob Tuttle, Interim President
So, 10+ matches next year at the Championship?

Akash Rastogi 30-04-2013 15:01

Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/ Good, But Should Be Better
 
I really love the direction FIRST is headed.

Thank you FIRST!

Jared Russell 30-04-2013 15:06

Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/ Good, But Should Be Better
 
With Frank and Bob at the helm, we are really headed in a good direction :cool:

Akash Rastogi 30-04-2013 15:09

Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/ Good, But Should Be Better
 
Also, I love how amazingly blunt this email is. There is no beating around the bush with anything, no excuses (other than the rain obviously). This is really cool to see. He states the issues like they are, and then states what needs to change. Just plain cool.

MysterE 30-04-2013 15:13

Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/ Good, But Should Be Better
 
I wish all organizations were this open.

seg9585 30-04-2013 15:20

Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/ Good, But Should Be Better
 
I'm curious -- what "major venue" was shut down due to the rain? Was there another activity in town that was cancelled and all those patrons came to the FRC Finale instead?

10 matches would be fantastic. We had 3+ hours in between matches on Friday which is excessive. I understand field reset takes so long and there are a lot of teams to play through, but for the amount of cost and effort to come to Championship, give us some reasonable playing time!

By "Team Finale" does this refer to the Einstein Field? I thought the flow of Closing Ceremonies was fine given the field reset times which drove the timeline. Could this have actually been reduced? Also, wasn't sure if Closing Ceremonies progressed following the final Einstein match -- most of us left at that point.

J-Blondie 30-04-2013 15:20

Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/ Good, But Should Be Better
 
While I think it is good that FIRST is trying to address people's concerns, I think we also need teams to be more understanding of the situation. Championships is always the big leagues and they are trying to have more of the best teams. There were tons of good teams this year so unfortunately not everyone will make it as far as elims or Einstein. I think teams generally are handling it well, but I have seen times where it's been a big display of just being downright not GP.

orangemoore 30-04-2013 15:21

Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/ Good, But Should Be Better
 
To get more matches without being really frantic next years game needs to have an easy reset. This year that seemed to be the biggest issue with the number of matches that we had.

Big Time consuming things this year:

Counting the frisbees
Getting climbing robots down

Mr V 30-04-2013 15:37

Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/ Good, But Should Be Better
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by orangemoore (Post 1270174)
To get more matches without being really frantic next years game needs to have an easy reset. This year that seemed to be the biggest issue with the number of matches that we had.

Big Time consuming things this year:

Counting the frisbees
Getting climbing robots down


Reset time was the big factor in determining the number of matches at regional events and CMP this year. I'm confident that they will consider this for next years game.

rsisk 30-04-2013 15:39

Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/ Good, But Should Be Better
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by seg9585 (Post 1270172)
I'm curious -- what "major venue" was shut down due to the rain? Was there another activity in town that was cancelled and all those patrons came to the FRC Finale instead?

10 matches would be fantastic. We had 3+ hours in between matches on Friday which is excessive. I understand field reset takes so long and there are a lot of teams to play through, but for the amount of cost and effort to come to Championship, give us some reasonable playing time!

By "Team Finale" does this refer to the Einstein Field? I thought the flow of Closing Ceremonies was fine given the field reset times which drove the timeline. Could this have actually been reduced? Also, wasn't sure if Closing Ceremonies progressed following the final Einstein match -- most of us left at that point.

TEam Finale is the event after the closing ceremonies, aka the science center event. I think they were expecting people to be both in and outside at the center. The rain drove everyone inside and made the event super crowded

Tommy F. 30-04-2013 15:43

Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/ Good, But Should Be Better
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rsisk (Post 1270188)
TEam Finale is the event after the closing ceremonies, aka the science center event. I think they were expecting people to be both in and outside at the center. The rain drove everyone inside and made the event super crowded

I thought I heard somewhere about it being at the Science Center and City Museum, the rain driving away the City Museum because of the amount of stuff to do outside there.

jwallace15 30-04-2013 15:48

Re: A Message from Bob Tuttle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Moriarty (Post 1270049)
At least 12 matches? That sounds amazing, but I am interested in how they will accomplish this.

Maybe there will be 4 robots per alliance! Chief Delphi Community, do you think that's stretching it a bit?

Clinton Bolinger 30-04-2013 15:51

Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/ Good, But Should Be Better
 
I wish that FIRST / Steele Meetings wouldn't force team to buy tickets for the FIRST Finale. When our team has gone through Steele Meetings we have never went to the finale because we want to stay till the end of Einstein (which is better then the Science Center).

Possible ways to increase matches at the Championship
- Less teams make it to the championship
- More Divisions
- No Practice Matches, Straight to Qualifications
- Faster Field Reset Times
- Stay Later on Thursday and/or Friday to play more matches
- Etc

-Clinton-

Alex2614 30-04-2013 16:01

Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/ Good, But Should Be Better
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 7h0m54 (Post 1270189)
I thought I heard somewhere about it being at the Science Center and City Museum, the rain driving away the City Museum because of the amount of stuff to do outside there.

There was nothing about that released by FIRST at all this year. It was going to be the St. Louis Science Center and the planetarium and lawn across the highway bridge.

However, even if the outside wasn't ruined by the rain, the fact that the busses let us out at the front of the science center, when most people's final destination was probably the lawn and planetarium to watch the fireworks/participate in all the games and activities (which is BEHIND the science center, but has its own road and bus turn around), the science center would have still been extremely crowded with people just trying to get THROUGH it.

They should have dropped us off at the planetarium. That way, people that wanted to stay outside could do so without jamming into the science center, and those that wanted to see the science center could do so without the crowding of people that just wanted to get through.

seg9585 30-04-2013 16:04

Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/ Good, But Should Be Better
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 7h0m54 (Post 1270189)
I thought I heard somewhere about it being at the Science Center and City Museum, the rain driving away the City Museum because of the amount of stuff to do outside there.

Science Center AND City Museum? They are not co-located and the Science Center requires transportation to get there from the Dome. I'm not sure how you could have a Finale event at both locations unless there was some transportation logistics setup in between, but that doesn't really make sense.

We walked to the City Museum on Friday night from our hotel near the Dome (and I had a ton of fun there).

bardd 30-04-2013 16:05

Re: A Message from Bob Tuttle
 
I think it's real awesome FIRST goes through all this efforts to improve. I haven't been with FIRST for a long time, only three years, but I still can definitely see the difference between the way FIRST ran when I joined in 2011 and the way it runs now. Nowadays, with the new people in charge, and especially Frank, I feel a lot more involved in the organisation, even without doing anything related to it's management. I also really appreciate FIRST's guts in making all of the changes that were made this year, and surprised they all went well.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwallace15 (Post 1270193)
Maybe there will be 4 robots per alliance! Chief Delphi Community, do you think that's stretching it a bit?

Definitely. Four robots per alliance will be too hard to watch and too hard to play. It will also demand changing the format of alliance selections, and I can't think of a format that doesn't make alliances 6-8 obsolete.

This is for another thread though... If you want and have the mental powers to search through 700+ posts, I remember a discussion about this in this year's game hint thread.

orangemoore 30-04-2013 16:40

Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/ Good, But Should Be Better
 
What if they had two fields for each division. So when one match finished they next match started. This would require more space, people, a well thought out schedule to be successful.

Tetraman 30-04-2013 16:53

Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/ Good, But Should Be Better
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Clinton Bolinger (Post 1270196)
Possible ways to increase matches at the Championship
*snip*
- More Divisions

Or, more fields per division, which would be the better answer. More divisions would require 4 more, as a championship bracket wouldn't work out very well with just 2 extra divisions unless those 2 divisions had a bye.

PayneTrain 30-04-2013 17:03

Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/ Good, But Should Be Better
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tetraman (Post 1270269)
Or, more fields per division, which would be the better answer. More divisions would require 4 more, as a championship bracket wouldn't work out very well with just 2 extra divisions unless those 2 divisions had a bye.

As someone who has been an advocate for a round robin with 4 divisions, it's also possible to have a round robin with 5 divisions where you play 10 matches and the two alliances with the best record play one-two more matches to decide the winner of the event. You also can fit a fifth FRC field on the existing arena floor.

RoboMom 30-04-2013 18:14

Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/ Good, But Should Be Better
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by seg9585 (Post 1270207)
Science Center AND City Museum? They are not co-located and the Science Center requires transportation to get there from the Dome. I'm not sure how you could have a Finale event at both locations unless there was some transportation logistics setup in between, but that doesn't really make sense.

We walked to the City Museum on Friday night from our hotel near the Dome (and I had a ton of fun there).

I think there was a little confusion between the Finale last year and this year. This year was just the Science Museum. Last year, there were a few other sites on the menu of activities, including the City Museum & Arch, with different buses servicing.

Also the Talent Show was at the Science Museum, instead of the Theater in the America's Center where it was held last year.

But because the finals/closing ceremonies in the Dome ran more than 1.5 hours long, it magnified some of the failure points as discussed in the posts above. I'm glad FIRST has addressed how disappointing this was on all sorts of levels.

11,000 people held wristbands for the Finale.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:55.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi