![]() |
6 Wheel Drives Without Dropped Centers
I've been looking at different drive systems lately and I have tried to come up with something that our team could try. I have heard of teams using 6 wheel drives without a dropped center so that it is truly a 6 wheel drive and not just a 4 wheel drive with some extra stability.
I have heard that 25 has used this concept before and looking at some threads from the early 2000's I found some information on it but I still don't quite understand how it would work. Can anyone enlighten me as to how this would work? Everything that I can think of says that a 6 wheel drive robot without a dropped center shouldn't turn without a special 7th wheel mechanism or omniwheels or something of the sort. |
Re: 6 Wheel Drives Without Dropped Centers
Hey Cam!
Someone from 25 will probably have to pop in to clear up the details, but here is what I know. 25 does use a 6WD with no drop. In the past, they have even gone up to 8WD, still with no drop. They use what has been termed as "Brute Force" turning; no tricks, no mechanism. It's all drive train for them. From what I recall, the secret lies in the wheels. Those massive drum wheels 25 has used in their drive system for years are from Skyway. 25 sands down the wheels so they are slick, and then cuts into them and adds tread as necessary. Here's a little more info on it: 25's Tires. While the thread is over 10 years old now, I seem to recall a thread in more recent years where the process is verified to still be alive. Like I said, an actual member of 25 is going to need to provide the details, but that's the just of it. EDIT: Here is a more straight-forward description of the design from a member of 25 - Link When it comes to drive systems with speed and power, you'd be hard-pressed these days to find a team who surpasses 25 in both respects. Regards, Leeland |
Re: 6 Wheel Drives Without Dropped Centers
4 traction wheel in the back or front and 2 omnis in the front or back.
Great traction and mobility. Our team uses this all the time. It is very effective. I have also heard of teams that put 2 omnis in the middle. |
Re: 6 Wheel Drives Without Dropped Centers
Omnis in the corners. Traction wheels in the center. Very maneuverable, fast, with a lot of pushing power.
|
Re: 6 Wheel Drives Without Dropped Centers
Last year I did my grade 12 physics final project on this topic. To super-simplify it (ignoring center of gravity, wheel coefficient of friction in x and y, gear ratios, etc) the rule of thumb is that you want your wheel base to be at least as wide as it is long.
There are multiple ways that a 6wd, no-drop center drive train can be effectively executed. The two most popular as far as I know are the following: Wide Base 6wd: This drive base is exactly what you describe, only the drive base is in wide configuration. The reason this works is because as our rule of thumb dictates, the base is wider than it is long. This is a kit of parts base, which does have a drop center, but it looks just like one would without the drop, just pretend :rolleyes: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/37486 4 traction + 2 omni: This drive train is probably more like you are envisioning, a standard long orientation, 6 wheel drive robot. The thing that allows this one to turn without issue is having omni wheels on one end. Omnis have very little friction sideways due to the rollers, essentially serving the same "cut the drive base in half" that a drop center does. Something like this, except with omnis only at one end: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/31039 |
Re: 6 Wheel Drives Without Dropped Centers
Quote:
Yes, thank you Leeland, you have come through for me again! This is exactly what I was wondering about. I hope someone from 25 could come in and provide a little bit more detail about this. Just wait till FLR next year when we have a 6 cim, 2 speed, 6 wheel no drop drive train ;) |
Re: 6 Wheel Drives Without Dropped Centers
Quote:
Here's a thread from 2010 that generated some good discussion about dropping the center wheel: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=85763. In particular, this post by Jared from 341 does a good job explaining some of the specifics of our drivetrain. If you have any more questions, feel free to ask (or come on down to Brunswick Eruption in November to check it out in person :)). |
Re: 6 Wheel Drives Without Dropped Centers
Quote:
|
Re: 6 Wheel Drives Without Dropped Centers
Quote:
|
Re: 6 Wheel Drives Without Dropped Centers
Our team had four traction wheels in the back and 2 omnis in the front. Does that count?
|
Re: 6 Wheel Drives Without Dropped Centers
Cheap option: zip ties around the treads of the 4 corner wheels?
|
Re: 6 Wheel Drives Without Dropped Centers
Quote:
As a fun side note, we blew one of our drive speed controllers at Battle O' Baltimore that year (and didn't have a replacement with us to swap it out) and were still able to drive around pretty well. |
Re: 6 Wheel Drives Without Dropped Centers
The turning ability of a robot with no drop-center and all traction wheels is dependent on the normal force experienced at each wheel. That is to say, it depends on how much force each of the wheels on the robot supports.
As Jared mentioned in his post that was linked to, a 6 wheel drive with no drop center is statically indeterminant. This is because if you isolate the physics on one side of the drive train (assuming a perfectly symmetrical robot), you have the force for 3 wheels as variables but only the sum of moments about the wheels' axes and the sum of forces in the vertical axis as equations. That's 3 variables and 2 independent equations, so this mathematical model cannot solve for how much weight each of the wheels supports. This makes it complicated to approach from a design perspective, which is why the over simplification of "a long wheel base robot without drop center wheels will not turn" is often made. In reality, as you approach the limit where all of the weight is supported by the 4 corner wheels, the robot will behave like a 4WD long robot and have difficulty turning. As more and more of the weight is supported by the center wheels, this reduces the normal force at the corners, thereby reducing the tractive force applied at the corners and reducing the robot's resistance to turning. More weight at the corners = Harder turning. Less weight at the corners = Easier turning. When the center wheel is dropped on a robot, much of the robot's weight is supported by the center wheel at all times in addition to shortening the wheel base, which makes turning easier (another generalization, but a widely accurate one so this is part of why drop centers are so popular). Team 25 REALLY knows what they are doing, which is why they can pull this off. My guess would be that criteria that lead them to this type of design decision are: -Makes it harder for defense to turn them -Eliminates rocking, so stability isn't an issue I personally cannot perform the math necessary to prove that a drive train without a drop-center would turn. I also have not done the necessary testing and experimentation to have the experience needed to design such a drive train that I will guarantee can turn well. Therefore, I would hesitate to build this type of drive train. This is where it's important for teams to build within their means and recognize them. |
Re: 6 Wheel Drives Without Dropped Centers
Does anyone know if versa wheels would work for this sort of drive train? They have really good traction going forward and backwards but not the best laterally because of the W tread on them. I think that this sort of wheel would almost be perfect for this scenario.
|
Re: 6 Wheel Drives Without Dropped Centers
Quote:
It might be worth trying with colsons though... |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:54. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi