![]() |
Re: The District System
Quote:
Well... That's awkward. I just chose 383 because cmrnpizzo was referencing teams at the Boston regional in the last 2 years, so I decided to do the same. Did not know that they were one of the few teams in distant parts of the world whom actually attend 2 regionals. I still stand by my point. |
Re: The District System
Quote:
|
Re: The District System
Quote:
Deciding what district an "outlier" falls under should, IMO, be left up to the team's "home" event and the team to figure out. For the Chileans, their "home" event is Los Angeles; should California go to a district format, I would be all for allowing them to join that district rather than having to find a new "home" event. The other part--attending two events with high travel cost/awkward time to get there--is not just a problem for international teams outside of Canada. There's the HI and Israel regionals, with their team groups, which are too small for a district system currently (and, in the case of HI, in-state travel can be a bit of a pain if you have to switch islands). There are some other blocs of teams--Kansas City among them--that are in a similar boat but could theoretically combine with another bloc to form 2-3 district events with a "reasonable" drive time. There's the UP teams in MI, who have to travel with hotel to a minimum of one if not two events. That said, there are ways to make it manageable; for example, I could see international teams going to back-to-back events in Weeks 1/2 and taking the intervening time to do some tourism. It could also be possible to apply a "correction factor" to the points for teams that can only do one event, or have certain championship events have "at-large" slots for international teams on top of their in-district slots. |
Re: The District System
Quote:
This would help limit the number of competitions that international teams are *forced* to attend while still providing them a nearly equal opportunity. I forgot to define international. I think that it would be safe assumption that anyone outside of continental North America could be considered international. My apologies to 359 and company, but Hawaii is essentially international territory in terms of location. |
Re: The District System
Quote:
|
Re: The District System
Quote:
Pardon me, I didn't mean for to appear that the international teams were only allowed to attend one event. It would be their decision to attend 1, 2, or more events. I simply meant that since international teams have significantly more difficulty in attending events they could opt before the season started to only attend one and then have those scores doubled, or like 383 does simply attend multiple events. |
Re: The District System
Quote:
This would make sense, since under districts, you can be good but not awesome (what would be a regional's tickets to Worlds) at your first and even second event, yet still qualify for Worlds be winning the District Championships. (<<Us) Maybe hold N slots at Champs for single-event OCONUS teams and invite based on a quasi-points ranking. I also wouldn't stress too much about the district vs. regional atmosphere (if anyone is). Maybe the ones in high school gyms wouldn't be so great when crossing an ocean, but there are districts at universities. Plus, some big-city regionals could probably turn into double district events in same/similar venues and keep their same "big show" impact. |
Re: The District System
Quote:
BTW, it was great alliancing with your team at WPI :) |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi