![]() |
What Drivetrain?
So I made a thread like this last year and I'm once again curious what drive train did your team use for Ultimate Ascent. Here is a link to the old thread I'm curious how the two compare. http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...vetrain+ poll
|
Re: What Drivetrain?
So, officially, my team used a 4 wheel tank but that was result of the products of the new robot dimensions and a wide orientation yielded a small enough track length for a 4WD.
- Sunny G. |
Re: What Drivetrain?
I love how you added Mecanum as the only choice in italics
|
Re: What Drivetrain?
Quote:
|
Re: What Drivetrain?
Quote:
|
Re: What Drivetrain?
Personally, I LOVE 6 wheel tank and think it can work for a lot of games.A lot of systems like swerve, west coast, ect are robot specific and strategy specific, while I think tank is easy to build, fix, and operate.
:) |
Re: What Drivetrain?
Quote:
|
Re: What Drivetrain?
It would be interesting to compare the pit scouting data from CMP and IRI, FiM and MAR, or any other sets of tournaments or regions to see how different regions or events compare in drive train usage. I'm familiar with the CMP division pit-scouting and am anticipating something similar for IRI, but is there a giant Google Docs spreadsheet of pit scouting?
|
Re: What Drivetrain?
Quote:
|
Re: What Drivetrain?
But I am a Swerve-Drive guy at heart. Yes, it is expensive (time, machining, weight, $s,...) and it is exceedingly difficult to execute well (and very easy to execute poorly). But well-executed Swerve-Drive is hard to beat as an FRC drive-train (this judgment is, of course, game dependent).
Swerve combines true 2-d drive capabilities with excellent traction. Since direction of travel is independent of chassis orientation, it does not telegraph intent like tank does. Its ability to vector drive force in any desired direction makes it formidable in defense as well as offence. But this comes with a high price tag, which includes extensive and continuous driver training. This never stops for us. |
Re: What Drivetrain?
Could someone please explain "butterfly" or "nonadrive"?
|
Re: What Drivetrain?
Quote:
A nonadrive is a butterfly drive but with a center set of omni wheels positioned perpendicular to the other wheels allowing for the whole drive train to strafe from side to side. Heres a video of 148s 2010 nonadrive you can see the drive train specifically at 1:10 and 1:33 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hTyXQUgYLE |
Re: What Drivetrain?
TIL
|
Re: What Drivetrain?
Quote:
|
Re: What Drivetrain?
We used a 6WD West Coast Drive this year for several reasons:
Note: we have a square robot (27.5" x 27.5") 1. The field had no raised obstacles, so no need for mechanisms like in 2010 or 2012 to traverse the field. 2. It gives you the widest wheelbase/track possible for the size. (I suppose wheelbase is debatable because of the dropped center.) 3. Our drive base is very simple and easy to fix, just a piece of extrusion, bearing blocks, chain, and wheels. (Don't trust hex bearings.) 4. It gave us more room for electronics and other mechanisms because of how little space the entire drive system takes up. 5. The drive base is very maneuverable, the added ability to shift allows us to go around or under the pyramid quickly, in addition to being able to push through defenders. I am sure there are other reasons, these are just the ones I can remember off of the top of my head. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:32. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi