Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Technical Discussion (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=22)
-   -   Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=117497)

Ingar 28-06-2013 00:36

Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs
 
I am curious as to how other teams deal with the inconsistencies in box tubing width when making a West Coast Drive. Since the snap ring groves must be CADed exactly in place it is not very tolerant of the variations in the box tubing's width.

AdamHeard 28-06-2013 00:48

Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs
 
download the cad in my sig.

our bearing block design isn't affected by tubing thickness.

for other designs, extra length must be added to handle the tolerance stackup.

Travis Covington 28-06-2013 00:49

Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs
 
You need to accommodate manufacturing tolerances in all of the parts involved (both extruded tubing, as well as any parts you make yourself). As such, lengthening the shaft some to accommodate tubing width variations, as well as bearing housing manufacturing tolerances is necessary and not really a big deal. This is pretty common. If you want to get really picky, you can add precision shims later to make up for the difference, but again, this is rarely ever worth the effort. Making things "line to line" never works well in the real world as you have already figured out.

AdamHeard 28-06-2013 01:23

Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs
 
For a more thorough answer, we also have to account for tolerance stackup... we just have one less item to add. this really isn't a huge difference.

DampRobot 28-06-2013 02:35

Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs
 
The most I've seen box tubing run over in the 2" dimension is around .003", and about .002" for the 1" dimension. (Inside dimensions are another story.) That's pretty high precision, I doubt most students could get similar precision on a manual lathe between two of those snap ring grooves.

While the box tubing per se is fairly high tolerance, once you start adding in other parts on the shaft, the tolerances really do start to stack up. As Travis said, line to line with something like snap ring grooves tends not to work very well. Instead, it's a good idea to add in a bit of wiggle room in the form of a small adder on the groove-groove dimension.

If you don't need to do two snap ring grooves, my team's used a slightly different solution which soaks up tolerances on the shaft stackup quite well. We put one snap ring on the shaft (this year, it was on the inside) and on the other end of the shaft, we tap a 10-32 hole. A screw in this hole with a few washers retains the wheel, and nicely soaks up any inaccuracies in the box tubing, bearing blocks, etc.

KrazyCarl92 28-06-2013 13:34

Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs
 
Quite honestly, until you're chasing after the last few available percentage points of efficiency in your drive system, tolerances down to the 3rd decimal place digits are ridiculous to make a fuss about. Precision to the hundredths of an inch or order of 0.005" at best would a more realistic goal for most teams when aiming to line up their snap ring grooves and drive components. It's better to have things exact, but at the same time it is not entirely critical to the drive system working.

While tolerances do stack up, adding on a 0.003" MAXIMUM variation (based on what I have seen and heard from others) is not going to have a profound influence when you aim to line up components over the length of your robot to within 0.020". If that 0.003" is the last straw, then you have another 0.017" somewhere in your system that you likely have more control over and would be more easily addressed. Go for the lowest hanging fruit first, then work toward a more elegant and optimized solution later as you chase excellence.

sanddrag 28-06-2013 20:33

Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs
 
We typically guestimate to account for powder coat thickness, then add another 5 thou planned allowance (slop), then add another 20 thou or so per side with the anticipation of using a shimming washer between sprocket and bearing and between wheel and bearing. Also, it won't hurt anything if there's a little extra space between the grooves. If you want to get it just perfect, you can custom machine spacers to exact length to go between the wheels and bearings.

Chris is me 28-06-2013 22:04

Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs
 
Easiest way we have found to account for this in our shaft design without having to think about it at all in advance is to use a snap ring on one side, and a screw + washer on the other (the wheel side).

AdamHeard 28-06-2013 22:44

Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs
 
We've seen deviation of +/-.005" easy on tubing, possibly more.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris is me (Post 1280785)
Easiest way we have found to account for this in our shaft design without having to think about it at all in advance is to use a snap ring on one side, and a screw + washer on the other (the wheel side).

The issue with this is it will compress the bearings and add friction. The bolt will also loosen over time.

T^2 29-06-2013 01:07

Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AdamHeard (Post 1280789)
The issue with this is it will compress the bearings and add friction. The bolt will also loosen over time.

Would a wave spring rectify this issue?

Chris is me 29-06-2013 01:13

Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by T^2 (Post 1280796)
Would a wave spring rectify this issue?

If you're careful when you do it, it's really negligible. Just backdrive the shaft before by hand to get a feel for it, line everything up, red loctite the bolt, and tighten down carefully until it's just snug. In our case, it helps that our Colson hubs have a ridge on the edge such that the part of the wheel contacting the bearing just touches the inner race. Get it just tight, then turn by hand and be sure it feels the same resistance wise. It may add a little friction, I guess, but subjectively it hasn't been much.

Adam's right in that it does loosen - check it before every day of competition, more often if you don't use red loctite.

AdamHeard 29-06-2013 01:20

Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by T^2 (Post 1280796)
Would a wave spring rectify this issue?

No. By the time you get any reasonable amount of preload to keep the bolt from loosening, you're clamping the bearing. Even if you have a spring, the spring will transmit this same force.

A wavespring could be used to take up slop in a bolted system for where the shaft is too long, but not when the shaft is too short as discussed.

The bolt also takes more time to install and remove than other methods.

sanddrag 29-06-2013 01:33

Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs
 
While we're on the topic of retaining wheels, does anyone have a favorite brand/model of snap ring pliers? Ours all slip out of the hole in the ring too easily.

Cory 29-06-2013 01:40

Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sanddrag (Post 1280800)
While we're on the topic of retaining wheels, does anyone have a favorite brand/model of snap ring pliers? Ours all slip out of the hole in the ring too easily.

McMaster 5449A65

sanddrag 29-06-2013 02:06

Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cory (Post 1280802)
McMaster 5449A65

Not to hijack the thread, but what actual brand is that plier?

R.C. 29-06-2013 02:12

Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sanddrag (Post 1280803)
Not to hijack the thread, but what actual brand is that plier?

David,

The brand should be Knipex, we own the same set of snap ring pliers. Also got the 90 degree ones.

They were recommended to us by the cows (1538) and we are very very happy with the quality of the pliers.

-RC

CENTURION 01-07-2013 00:10

Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by R.C. (Post 1280804)
David,

The brand should be Knipex, we own the same set of snap ring pliers. Also got the 90 degree ones.

They were recommended to us by the cows (1538) and we are very very happy with the quality of the pliers.

-RC

I was about to suggest Knipex too. :D

Brandon_L 08-07-2013 18:30

Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AdamHeard (Post 1280731)
download the cad in my sig.

our bearing block design isn't affected by tubing thickness.

for other designs, extra length must be added to handle the tolerance stackup.

I've been playing with those blocks, and just wondering how the ones in the slots are kept in place. Do they just float in the middle somewhere held by chain tension? That seems really weird. I don't see how you lock them down in your CAD.

EDIT: Now that I look at it, its only 3/8ths of wiggle. So it might not be as big as an issue as I think.

AdamHeard 08-07-2013 20:48

Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Brandon_L (Post 1281619)
I've been playing with those blocks, and just wondering how the ones in the slots are kept in place. Do they just float in the middle somewhere held by chain tension? That seems really weird. I don't see how you lock them down in your CAD.

EDIT: Now that I look at it, its only 3/8ths of wiggle. So it might not be as big as an issue as I think.

When the blocks are loose, a chain tensioner pulls them against a fully taught chain.

This position is locked in when the faceplates are tightened.

If a WCD drive bearing block doesn't clamp the frame, it will not work well. This rigidity is key

Brandon_L 08-07-2013 22:16

Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AdamHeard (Post 1281639)
When the blocks are loose, a chain tensioner pulls them against a fully taught chain.

This position is locked in when the faceplates are tightened.

If a WCD drive bearing block doesn't clamp the frame, it will not work well. This rigidity is key

Im not entirely sure what you mean by the first bit. But it sounds like you'd have them loose when you're putting the chains in and slide them around to get your tension, then tighten them down. Your first sentence made it sound like there is another tensioner somewhere, though.

KrazyCarl92 08-07-2013 22:24

Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Brandon_L (Post 1281652)
Im not entirely sure what you mean by the first bit. But it sounds like you'd have them loose when you're putting the chains in and slide them around to get your tension, then tighten them down. Your first sentence made it sound like there is another tensioner somewhere, though.

This other tensioner is most often a cam mounted inside the tubing that can be rotated to adjust the position of the bearing block along the length of the slot, and thereby properly tension the chain when the bearing blocks are loose. Then the bearing blocks are tightened in place to help maintain their position until they need to be adjusted again.

craigboez 08-07-2013 22:37

Re: Box tubing inconsistenies for WCDs
 
If memory serves, the tensioners are missing from some of 973's CAD files. Download the most recent one from Hurricane and you'll see the tensioners.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 23:21.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi