What we expect to see from FRC/FIRST in the next 5 years
 

What do you guys expect to see from FRC/FIRST in the next 5 years. It could be anything from game, to larger pits, to smaller robot, or anything.

Re: What we expect to see from FRC/FIRST in the next 5 years
 

I expect to see robots.

Re: What we expect to see from FRC/FIRST in the next 5 years
 

districts, districts every where

Re: What we expect to see from FRC/FIRST in the next 5 years
 

I predict technology will be advanced pretty far in five years to the point where FRC robots are a lot faster and stronger than they are now.

Re: What we expect to see from FRC/FIRST in the next 5 years
 

I want to see IRI, live, in person, not just over a webcast. (I am a bit bitter, if you cannot tell.)

What do I want to see from FIRST? Districts in my area, and Missouri making a bigger presence on the international level.

Re: What we expect to see from FRC/FIRST in the next 5 years
 

I'm going to cheat, I'm going to say what I WANT to see.

Focus on documenting impact: We're an expensive program and right now it's difficult to prove that FTC/VEX/BEST/BunnyBot type programs are not as effective from a cost perspective.

Return to emphasis of partnering with industry: Looking back through FIRST's history teams that partnered closely with local industry were revered. Now many within FIRST revile them. I'd like to see HQ go back to comments about how this is not some science fair, this is a "professional sport" and we need trainers, we need experts, we need professional analysts and strategists. I'd love HQ to come out and say "Teams like 67, 1114, and 254? They get it!"

District Reorganization: Districts are a stop-gap measure to decrease apparent costs to teams (5k => 8 matches is bad, 5k => 24 matches is less bad) and it's wonderful for that. The problem is it's crap for changing our culture. It IS a bunch of nerds in a high school gym. It's not as awe inspiring as full size events used to be. I don't know what the solution here is but it needs to be investigated. (Of course, some of the Regionals are pretty badly run and I'd be embarrassed to bring higher ups or politicians to them too)

Decrease in Robot Size: I think this year's robot size decrease should stick. It opened up the field a lot and led to more exciting energetic games.

Re: What we expect to see from FRC/FIRST in the next 5 years
 

I HOPE to see a bigger public awareness for FIRST and all that we do. Right now FIRST has less of a public awareness, from what I've seen, then high school Rugby in America. To do this we as the FIRST community need to be proud of what we do and make it loud around our community and reach for reorganization for what we boldly do. I think FIRST should make a walkthrough of some kind for beginning teams that way they don't get overwhelmed with all FIRST has to offer. I would also like to see a large push from FIRST for all high schools to adopt a FIRST robotics program. Know I want to make sure and note that VEX and other robotics programs are excellent but I have participated in them and they are nothing like FIRST in any way; they seem better fitted for middle school students. If we as members of the FIRST community want to get the same recognition for what we do as varsity players get for what they do then we need to be loud and proud just like varsity sport players are.


What I HOPE FIRST never changes is how competitive it is while still maintaining GP. In other sports and clubs you either get a massive drive for winning with no regards to others or the rules or they don't care about winning just as long as "everyone has fun" and this doesn't promote good ethics either. FIRST seems to be unique with this large drive of winning and the wonderful thing we call GP.


In regard to the technology I hope FIRST progress with the times as technology grows and changes. I would like to see FIRST allow a touch interface controller for the robots along with more technologically advanced interfaces. I am satisfied with the size of the robot now and I would be alright with the size staying fairly similar but maybe changing slightly depending on the size of the game piece. I am for the use of instant replay to determine scoring and rule violations on the field because as a foundation promoting STEM we should use technology anywhere it can benefit us.


I'm sure I left out some great points that I hope others with more experience then me will hit on and what I've said here are my views and I want to make it clear that I'm not trying to speak for the entire FIRST community because I'm sure many people disagree with my opinions.

Re: What we expect to see from FRC/FIRST in the next 5 years
 

More Freedom

Re: What we expect to see from FRC/FIRST in the next 5 years
 

We will see the continuation of popular games as each season's challenge. (Soccer, frisbee, basketball, etc.)

Re: What we expect to see from FRC/FIRST in the next 5 years
 

1. The extinction of the Kit of Parts for most Veteran teams. Teams can still opt in to get it, but the majority of parts will be an online choice.

2. *Preliminary* schedules before some events. Note, preliminary (don't mess this one up by thinking that they are final)

3. An expansion of the district model. This model does not fit all regions though, so likely not an all-encompassing system.

4. Viewer-friendly games. i.e. you can explain the game reasonably well in 30 seconds.

5. Comparable robot size with continuation of frame perimeter maximum in place of length/width restrictions. They will never become larger than 28" by 38" (doorways).

6. Possible extra week of competitions (7 in addition to district championships and world championships) pushing back championships one week.

7. MORE. More teams, robots, matches, events, inspiration, videos, volunteers, students, mentors, experience, money, awards, etc...

8. High-scoring games that any level of team can participate in, but never feel constrained in.

9. Additional support for teams creating a simple robot. (Ri3D, easy out of the box bots for rookies)

10. New control system.

11. Revamping of either the structure/format of world championships or the procedure to qualify. Waitlisting will no longer be an option. My guess would be that either Engineering Inspiration or Rookie All-Star Teams will not qualify for Championships (from the remaining regional competitions)

12. More recognition: locally, nationally, and globally. This will affect FIRST in ways we cannot imagine, and the results will depend on from whom this recognition comes from.

13. Extremely slow reduction of robot-related rules.

Re: What we expect to see from FRC/FIRST in the next 5 years
 

.
.
.
.
.
.
Water.

Sorry.

In all seriousness, a few things I expect to see is easy to understand games, more districts and more teams.

A continuation of the financial cap but a reduction on part limits. ie 10 cims if u wanted (but why would you want to?)

Re: What we expect to see from FRC/FIRST in the next 5 years
 

I Expect to see from FRC/FIRST is quadcopters! seriously were at the point were if people can buy kits for 500$. I would love to see some a 4 team alliance, 3 ground robots and 1 airbot. I think this would take First to a new level.
Next I would like to see new ways to get into CMP so no wait list but instead engineering inspiration go to CMP.
Also more outreach for FIRST so the world can learn who we are.

Re: What we expect to see from FRC/FIRST in the next 5 years
 

I expect a large increase in the number of events--it takes at least two districts to replace a single regional.

I expect to see a major change in the qualifications for Championship, roughly at the time the district system hits its "saturation point" where the remaining teams are out of range of 2 events, but can do one.

I expect to see the transparency continue.

I expect a new control system, and at least one new Championship venue.

I would NOT expect to see things stay the same; change drives invention, which drives more change.

Re: What we expect to see from FRC/FIRST in the next 5 years
 

I would expect more districts, more teams (obviously), more games with the spectator friendly scoring and, more exposure and popularity for FRC/FIRST. I would like to see the current motor rules continue maybe with the addition of other motor types as well.