![]() |
BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measurements
Hi all,
I’m attempting to learn useful ways to track battery health/status using the Battery Beak. I’m looking for verification on the things I’ve learned and any suggestions the intelligent, experienced people like you can provide. I plan on using the Battery Beak on the ES17-12 battery model from MKPowered. I’ve met some resistance (no pun intended) from members on my team that think the Battery Beak is too simple and underplay the utility tracking the internal resistance of a battery can offer. I want to convince them otherwise. From my understanding, tracking the internal resistance is useful for the following reasons:
Simply put, by the end of build season, batteries with low internal resistance and slow growth in their internal resistances are prime candidates for use in competition. Are there any issues with my understanding or useful reasons I’ve missed? Do any other teams track internal resistance through time? |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
At the beginning of the season, we measure the CCA of the batteries. We use the best ones last so they don't get too much use. Then, before we pack for competition we remeasure and reorder them from 1 to 8. We use the highest rated batteries first.
|
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Quote:
|
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
A battery beak can be used to diagnose two battery problems:
First, It provides an internal resistance (derived from the voltage at 1 and 18 amps). The lower the better and internal resistance generally charts the health of the battery. The "Good", "Fair" & "Bad" ratings are determined by internal resistance only. This, therefore, provides a ranking method. Beware, though, because there tends to be some noise in this signal. Second, the voltage at 0 amp (and % charged) will let you know if your battery loses a cell. A fully charged battery should read >100% charged on the battery beak. If you're down around 90% or lower and your charger indicated a full charge, you are down a cell. |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Win,
The internal resistance of the battery will vary with temperature, state of charge, how long it has been off the charger, age and how many times it has gone through a charge/discharge cycle. While the Beak is a good check for battery condition, you likely will get better data with a different test method. Nothing beats a Beak in your pocket to know you are ready to play with a known good battery. If you are trying to check against manufacturer's spec, you must test under their conditions. The stated test data varies from manufacturer to manufacturer which is why the MK battery and Enersys are rated for different amp hour capacities when they are identical batteries. I recommend the CBAIV from West Mountain Radio which happens to be located close to you. While the test takes a couple of hours for each battery, it allows you to overlay tests and print results. It will display real time amp hour capacity throughout the test and then store the results. You can vary the load up to 150 watts which allows you to set the discharge rate to match the specifications or to increase the discharge to simulate robot conditions. One of the best parts of this tester is the ability to see if individual cells have reduced capacity and if there is internal arcing due to damaged plate connections or inter cell wiring. |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Quote:
|
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
As a quick test, the Beak is great. We use one all the time.
IF you can maintain about the same conditions (see Al's post) for each test, then monitoring the battery's internal resistance over time can give some good clues as to what's happening inside. But consider these as relative measurements, not absolutes. The West Mountain Radio Computerized Battery Analyzer (CBA IV) actually discharges the battery at a rate you can set - stock is up to 150 W which means over 10 Amps, and you can buy an 'amplifier' load for IIRC 450 Watts. However, even knowing the actual number of Amp-hours the battery can deliver at 10 A doesn't tell you what it will deliver in competition. So again, this should be considered a relative reading, valuable to monitoring battery health, but not for checking against manufacturer specs. If we focus on FRC, what we "really" need to know is covered by the Beak: A relative indication of health, and present State of Charge. All that being said, WinDnDusT, #1 and #3 aren't reasonably easy, but #2 is really what you 'need', and is very do-able with a Beak. (Just one caution: If the battery is "bad", it is - don't use it for the stands, as it may be more hassle than it is worth. Recycle it instead.) |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Quote:
You can't with a battery beak you need a load tester. A load tester is the best item to see how a battery can respond to the load that it will see in a match. The typical automotive load tester will put a 100 or 125 amp load on the battery for as long as you hold the "test" button. |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
1most of the inexpensive ones I have seen warn you not to hold the button more than 10 or 15 seconds |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
So as to not confuse the masses, there are several terms here that need explanation and a little tie to FRC robots...
CCA is Cold Cranking Amps and is measured at 0 degrees F for 30 sec and is rated by how many amps during this test will bring the battery down to 7.2 volts. Wholly meaningless measurement for our use at normal indoor temps. Small batteries do not specify CCA for most manufacturers. CA is cranking amps (@32 F degrees) in car battery specs but is charge/discharge rating in our battery specs. Not the same measurement! 1 CA~1 Amp Hour. For our 18 amp hr battery this is 18 amps but measured at 25C. Amp Hour is a rating that specifies how long the battery will deliver current until the terminal voltage reaches a certain level (@25 degrees C and that level varies from manufacturer to manufacturer.) It does not specify the max current nor does it indicate a time at any current other than that shown. It is typically measured at 1/20 of the amp hr rating. That is an 18 amp hour battery delivering 1/20*18 amps= 0.9, amps will take 18 hours to reach ~8 volts. At higher currents, the time decreases. An Enersys is speced at only 6.5 minutes delivering 54 amps continuous to fall to 8 volts terminal voltage. Internal Resistance is an equivalent resistance that causes the terminal voltage to drop in proportion to load current. This is due to the voltage drop (Ohm's Law) across the internal resistance. This resistance varies with charge, temperature and age. A typical new, fully charged, robot battery will have 0.011 ohms of internal resistance or about the same resistance as 11 feet of #10 wire. Battery Testers of this type http://www.mcmaster.com/#battery-testers/=o19fra use high current loads, 60 and 125 amps or simply 125 amps and produces a meter deflection to show good or bad. A car battery (.003 ohm) has an internal resistance typically 1/4 of our battery (.011 ohm) so this tester will not give you a good idea of the state of the smaller battery. I cringe at teams that use this battery tester as it will continue to load the battery as long as the switch is held "on" which under certain conditions can damage the battery. The Battery Beak as stated above makes two quick measurements, one at 1 amp and one at 18 amps and uses those measurements to calculate the internal resistance and from there an indication of battery state. If a cell is dead or shorted, it will show up during this test. If the cell is reduced capacity, it cannot show it as it takes some period of time for the cell to discharge. Only a long term test can reveal reduced capacity. Fortunately, this type of battery failure is rare and usually is a result of rough handling (dropping). I have seen defective cells capable of producing current for half the time other cells produce. These batteries will reduce by 2 volts for each bad cell, their terminal voltage under load. A no load test (open circuit voltage) on these batteries will show good. Long term testers such as the CBAIV will show all of these issues and you can vary the load and conditions to use it to test other batteries as well. The down side wilth any long term tester is the amount of time it takes, and that it must discharge the battery to perform the test. (See above post) |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Quote:
|
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
2 Attachment(s)
Attached is a graph of the discharge curves at 77F for the Yuasa NP18-12B battery, taken from the Yuasa datasheet for the battery. That battery is rated at 17.2 AH. So the 0.2 CA discharge curve would correspond to roughly 3.4 amps discharge rate. According to that curve, the battery voltage should remain above 11.5 volts at that discharge rate for 2 hours. That corresponds to roughly 6.8 AH discharged. Now take a look at this CBAIII curve for a battery with a weak cell1. Note the sudden drop-off in voltage at about 3.2 AH into the test, caused by a weak cell. 125 amps for 15 seconds is only 0.5 AH, so it's not obvious that such a test would identify the bad cell. In fact, I have a lawn tractor battery with a bad cell that passes the 125A test when freshly charged. If you don't have the budget for a CBA tester, there is a home-brew solution. Go to the auto junkyard and find a nice sealed beam2 36 watt 12V headlight. Hook it up to the battery and monitor the voltage under load for 2 hours3. That's roughly 6 AH. If the loaded voltage drops below ~11.5 volts, stop the test. You may want to mark that battery not for competition use. BTW, the lawn tractor battery mentioned above (which passes the 125A test) fails the 2 hour test. 1 reproduced from this post, for those who don't have PDF reader installed 2sealed beam for safety (do not use a replaceable bulb). no cracks or chips or signs of damage. competent adult supervision required. always use safety glasses. 3digital voltmeter with sufficient accuracy can be had for $5 (or less, on sale) at Harbor Freight |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Quote:
20 hours is usually used for larger batteries, 10 hours for smaller ones. You need to read the specs o see what the manufacturer used. Also the exact ending voltage is a standard, but I don't have that info handy at the moment. It is around 8 volts though. |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Don,
There doesn't seem to be a standard which is why the curves for the two legal batteries are similar but the ratings are different. If you overlay them the differences are minimal but the values are different. In looking at the curve linked in Ether's post, you can see all the curves nose diving to 8 volts but many of the curves are truncated so as to not confuse the customer. The MK VLRA Technical Manual specifies amp hour based on 1.75 volts per cell. "Ampere Hour Capacity at 20, 6, 3 and 1 Hour Rates: Ampere hour capacity is a unit of measure that is calculated by multiplying the current in amperes by the time in hours of discharge to 1.75 volts per cell. These are nominal or average ratings." |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Thanks for all your responses! (Don, did you know that your team was sitting behind mine at Championships during Einstein matches? We were thrilled because our team numbers are sequential)
Al and Don, I think I see the errors in my understanding. I was assuming it would be easy to track the contribution made by age (sulfation) to the internal resistance. I now understand that due to the multiple contributing factors (temperature, state of charge, amount of surface charge) to internal resistance, this is difficult to do. So I probably won't use #3 for making decisions, but I am still curious to try it as an experiment (using a controlled process to measure internal resistance). I also see that #1 isn't really doable because I don't know the conditions during the manufacturer's test. So I think I was a little optimistic about tracking internal resistance measurements over time with the Battery Beak. For #2, I gather that the most important thing is to make sure that you don't use a battery that the Battery Beak measures as 'Bad'. I think I see from the comments here that an internal resistance measurement of 'Good' or 'Fair' from the Battery Beak isn't the same as a clean bill of health because this type of test cannot reveal reduced cell capacity. Does this imply that a battery can have reduced capacity without having an increased/abnormal internal resistance? (Btw, Al and Ether, thanks for your explanations of discovering reduced capacity via long term test) |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Quote:
We don't have a person who has the domain knowledge to create battery management processes and policies for us. And we really felt the consequences of that this past year. We started off the 2013 season with 6 new batteries and by the end of the season, not one inspires confidence for use in matches. We took all of our batteries to a neighbor team's workshop and borrowed a machine that put a load on the batteries. We put a 200 A load on the batteries and not one of our batteries made it 5 seconds before dropping to unusable voltage. This did not contrast nicely with the neighbor team's batteries which lasted much longer (around 35-45 seconds I think). So I'm trying to gain the requisite knowledge to be able to step into this role. |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Win,
The cells with reduced capacity that are shown in Ether's post and my discussion are cells that for one reason or another have some of the plates within the cell damaged or detached. The change in internal resistance is very small but the cell has less available power density and so it dies out sooner than the other cells. I recommend that teams do not try to pull 200 amps from a battery for extended lengths of time. Yes, robots do pull more than that but it is for much shorter periods of time. (except in extended pushing with another robot) The effects of this high current, extended test, is to warp the internal structures of the cells and raise the internal temperature to the point where cell relief valves vent the higher pressure (and water vapor) to atmosphere. I also believe that the separator (absorbed glass mat) may become damaged as well producing another type of internal resistance that discharges the cell constantly. In these batteries, the terminal voltage will fall in multiples of 2 volts after sometime (several hours to a few days) from being removed from the charger. All of the test methods including a voltmeter will show this defect when the cell has become completely depleted. In worse case events, the discharge is extreme enough to cause heat, leakage, case swelling and steam. Above all, remember that our batteries have a stated life of only 400 charge/discharge cycles under optimal conditions. Our severe use cause this life to be reduced to perhaps 300 cycles or less. |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Al, thanks again!
I now have a much better understanding of what the Battery Beak is capable of telling me in terms of internal resistance. Thankfully, pulling the 200A from the batteries was the first and only time we've done that (although I realize the risk for damage isn't mitigated because of this). I'll advise my team against any tests of that sort in the future. I am also looking into the CBA IV from West Mountain Radio that you mentioned. Out of curiosity, would the CBA IV allow you to find the Peukert constant of a battery? I know the (approximate) value of the constant when the battery is new, but I also know that it changes as the battery ages. Also, I'm interested in keeping to the 50% percent rule for our batteries. Assuming that rule applies to our robot batteries, will the Battery Beak assist me here? If I take a state of charge measurement before using a freshly charged battery, do some work with the battery, and then take another state of charge measurement from that battery, will I know the true amount of capacity removed from the battery (In units of % rather than Amp hours)? |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Win,
I am guessing you are trying to make a judgement based on usage to predict battery life. There are some methods to do that but none are very accurate since the load varies with each match. The CBA will allow you to make a calculation to get Pleukert's constant but it will take several tests at different loads to do that. Unfortunately, the life of the battery and the temperature are constants you cannot readily measure with any accuracy. I am not sure what your 50% rule is, can you elaborate? I do have some rules of thumb I consider in battery use. These are merely observations reduced to writing... 1. If you deplete the battery in one two minute match, you have an inefficient drive system. If your robot suddenly starts to do this, you have a broken drive train. 2. Don't use 6 motor drives simply because you have they are the best. I can show you more teams that eat a battery than get a benefit from the multi-motor drive. 3. If you are only using 4 motors and succumb to rule #1 above, you have chosen the wrong final gear ratio for the game. More important if you are only using two motors. 4. A battery should last long enough to drive in two or three matches minimum before running down. 5. Never trust any of the above rules, always use a freshly charged battery. 6. Even batteries that come right off the charger can be bad and fail in a match. 7. The robot is talking to you, listen to what it is telling you. In troubleshooting a robot electrical issue, I watch the battery voltage monitor on the DS dashboard. If you are driving and the voltage is falling to 6 or 7 volts you are going to have a problem soon. At sustained voltages of less than 6 volts, the regulators in the digital sidecar start to drop out, killing drive to your robot. At less that 4.5 volts, the power supplies on the PD cease causing the Crio and/or the radio to reboot. There are a number of reasons that could cause this. Too much load current, dead battery, too long of a #6 wire run, improper crimp or loose connections on the battery, the main breaker or the PD, will all contribute to low voltage. |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Quote:
|
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Quote:
Quote:
Now in the real world, external resistance is significant, but this theoretical exercise helps explain how internal resistance is a good indicator of battery health (and capacity). So, your answer is No. |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Yes, sorry.
I am referring to discharging a battery to only 50% depth of discharge. I am wondering if the state of charge measurement after two minutes of activity (real match or simulated match) is accurate enough to allow promoting a 50% discharge policy with my team or to use as a troubleshooting technique to indicate that the robot uses too much power. I suspect that due to surface charge, it may not be. |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Win,
Your biggest issue with 50% rule is determining the 50% SOC point. If you were to accurately determine the current output of the battery and added a fudge factor for battery life, you might be able to predict the actual charge state. Under current robot rules, you cannot add anything between the battery and the PD except the main breaker and associated wire. Due to the nature of the DC source, loop current monitoring really doesn't work. You can however, measure the voltage drop across a known length of #6 wire. This resistance will change very little with temperature but will give you an indication of the current via Ohm's Law. Maxim makes a chip set to monitor battery charging in laptops and other devices made especially for this. The only issue is getting enough resolution over the current swing you would expect. Start current on a four CIM drive could easily exceed 400 amps and with the robot resting, current is likely less than an amp or two. As Don pointed out, battery current is affected by the internal resistance but more important, that resistance has a voltage drop. At nominal internal resistance of 0.011 ohm, 100 amps will drop 1.1 volts. 400 amps will drop 4.4 volts giving you an output of only 7.6 volts. When you add in the drop in voltage for a depleted battery, you are now approaching the point where the power supplies start dropping out. It is this effect that gets most robots into trouble. That is why the field monitors robot voltage in addition to other things (like packet loss, connection, etc.). If we see loss of connection or packet loss at the same time we see a drop in robot voltage, we know what is at issue. To put this in perspective, loose connections (and bad crimps) on the main wiring, long cable runs and the main breaker can all sum to the same resistance as the internal battery resistance. So at 100 amps you have a 2.2 volt drop at the input to the PD instead of a 1.1v. Remember that includes the red and the black wire together since all robot current flows through both wires. If we come to Milwaukee next month we can talk further. |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Quote:
Are there any teams out there who regularly measured and recorded internal resistance and state-of-charge using battery beak, before and after each match? Would you be willing to post your data (and procedure*) here? *for example, how long did you wait after charging (to let surface charge dissipate) to measure the before-match values, and how long did you wait after the match (to let the battery stabilize) to measure the values |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Quote:
I suspect that it's also possible for a (damaged, old, or abused) FRC battery to have reduced capacity without showing a definitive increase in internal resistance. Tom Line and/or Hugh Meyer, If you are following this thread, do you by any chance have internal resistance measurements for the bad-cell batteries you tested? |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
3 Attachment(s)
WinDnDustT,
I would highly recommend the west mountain CBA tester. It gives a good solid indication of the state of the battery under test. We purchased one several years ago and it has given us data that takes the guess work out of knowing the state of the battery. We test our batteries at least once per year during build season, so we have fresh data on our complete inventory before competitions start. I compare the results to previous years to decide if a battery will be used for competition. By looking at the discharge curves as they change from year to year we can tell when a battery is nearing end of life. Bad batteries go to the recycler and marginal batteries are marked “Not for Competition”. Only good ones are used for competition. Throughout each event we log the state of charge before the match using the battery beak tester. Attached is a copy of what we do. I have several years of log data and so far have not found the internal resistance to be much of an indicator of anything useful. Since we got the battery beak the first year it came out we have not had a battery fail in a significant way. We do have some that are getting higher than normal. I have been told by the people that make the battery beak that an internal resistance in the range of .035 is a trashed battery. Haven’t seen that yet, but we have some getting up to .028. In an odd sort of way I am hoping to see a failure this season just so I can see what the internal resistance is when they fail. Most of our batteries measure in the range 0.015 - 0.025. These batteries perform fine. One thing that is important, but not mentioned so far in this thread is the state of your connections. In our FRC world by far a much more significant issue is the connections that people make. It is extremely important that you make good tight clean solid connections throughout the circuit. When you test a battery your measurement is only as good as your weakest connection. Since you are not a rookie team I assume you know this but I wanted to mention it just to be sure others reading understand the importance of good connections. Attachment 1 is our log template that we complete at competitions. Attachment 2 is our inventory data sheet that shows battery history. You can see when we got our beak tester where that data starts to populate. Attachment 3 is a log sheet completed. Seeing a team go dead in a match because of a dead battery is really sad. More than once I have heard a team declare they unintentionally went out with a dead battery. ALWAYS know the state of your batteries!! The beak tester and CBA tester are great tools! -Hugh |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Quote:
I wouldn't recommend using it on a daily basis but at the beginning of the season or before heading to competition is not a bad idea. |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Quote:
We test our batteries using the west mountain device in the first two weeks of the season to weed out any batteries we killed during demonstrations, then rank the rest based on Amp-Hours. |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Quote:
|
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Quote:
|
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
[quote=evanperryg;1287356...We figured it was a fluke and threw it on the charger. about 5 minutes later, I go and check this battery to see if it is ok. The thing is hot(as in burn-your-hands hot) and still at 8v. Long story short, nothing is a fluke with a battery.[/quote]
This is not unusual, the battery shorted two cells internally and the heat produced was coming from the energy conversion in those two cells. The battery was likely producing steam and vapor as well. Often a close examination of the battery case would reveal evidence a drop or severe shock. |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
1 Attachment(s)
Quick pic of poor man's battery discharge tester. Battery voltage is on the left. Battery amps on the right*. Meters can be had for less than $5 each at Harbor Freight. Sealed beam headlight is from my 68 Camaro, I think. Found it in a pile of old auto parts. Not quite 36 watts. Battery is from my lawn tractor. For actual use, the wiring should be cleaned up, and the headlight secured safely on a fireproof surface. sealed beam for safety (do not use a replaceable bulb). no cracks or chips or signs of damage. competent adult supervision required. always use safety glasses. *The ammeter is just to confirm the lamp's wattage. You don't need the ammeter for the test if you know the wattage. |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Quote:
No exact answer yet. This might mean an opportunity to conduct a science experiment with the Battery Beak. |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Al,
Thanks for all the explanation and rule of thumb list. I wasn't originally thinking about using a tool to measure the current draw of the robot but now I'm curious about it. Although I understand the difficulties you mention in finding the right tool for the job. How would a team figure out the robot is drawing too much current from the battery (before repeated abuse kills the battery)? It sounds like there isn't an easy way to figure this out so most teams don't think about it and get lucky/unlucky. Hugh, Thanks for all the info. It's very useful to see actual data measurements. Now I know what to expect when working with our own batteries. I might use these templates too. |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Quote:
|
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Win,
The more than one match rule is hard to beat. If you go through several of your batteries and each dies towards the end of 2.5 minutes in normal driving, you are too inefficient. If the battery dies before the end of the match (exhibited by robot drive "stutter", Crio reboot and/or loss of comms) you are severely shortening the life of your batteries. I do not have any hard data on this but my gut (observation and anecdotal reports) tells me it is likley reducing by a third to a half the lifespan of a typical battery. |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
What do people consider the typical lifespan of a battery? I have teams ask me this and I never have a good answer since it depends on so many factors.
|
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
According to the battery spec sheet, it is 400 charge/discharge cycles under normal conditions.
|
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Quote:
200 cycles...100% depth of discharge 225 cycles....80% depth of discharge 500 cycles....50% depth of discharge |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Quote:
|
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
Ether,
Thanks for the pic of the homebrew test information. Our team is looking at purchasing the battery beak, but they are out of stock at Andymark (could get it direct from Cross the Road, but we still have credit left at Andymark). So I'm thinking about trying your test as an alternative to purchasing the West Mountain CBA (will try to get one of those next year). Also, there are three connections on the back of the headlight I have, which is also from an old Camaro - but a '79. The light is labeled GEH6024. Do you happen to know what each one might be for? I'm assuming high beam, low beam, and ground? But I'm not having much luck in finding a diagram to know which is which. Any other suggestions on the data we should take? I was thinking that we should record Volts and Amps every 10 minutes for the 2 hours). But from your previous post it sounds as though the 11.5 volts at the end of 2 hours is our determining factor to tell if the battery should be used or not. Thanks for your and others help on this topic. |
Re: BatteryBeak: Utility of making internal resistance and state of charge measuremen
I believe you are correct that the 3 terminals are hi, lo, and ground. Connect the battery thru your ammeter1 to two of the terminals and measure amps. Whichever gives you closest to 3 amps is what you want. You can measure the volts periodically if you wish. Use the manufacturer's published discharge curves as a reference for what the voltage should be2 as time progresses. If the battery voltage drops well below where it should be, you can stop the test - the battery is weak. If you're getting good readings and you stop the test too soon, you may get a false result - you may think the battery is OK when in fact it is not. WEAR SAFETY GLASSES and FOLLOW ALL SAFETY PROCEDURES. 1 make sure the ammeter is set to 10 amp (or more) scale or you risk burning it up. 2 ask if you need help deciphering the curves |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:01. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi