Chief Delphi - Best Theoretical Alliance

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)

- General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)

- - Best Theoretical Alliance (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=118737)

Re: Best Theoretical Alliance

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris is me (Post 1289262)

As tempted as I am to agree with this - 469's on season performance is only rivaled by 2056's IRI performance - if we're talking about "perfect" alliances you can't leave 72 (20 + 20 + 20 + 30 - 18) net points on the board. While 254, 1986, 1114, etc. are not at 469's disc-handling level, they're good enough to score all the discs together and they have the additional climb points.

This is my official response. :cool:

Re: Best Theoretical Alliance

Quote:

Originally Posted by evanperryg (Post 1289278)

I disagree. Even if the first seed alliance had beat 1477, 610, and 1241 then it would have been extremely tight. Everyone knew 1114's climber was broken, so nobody tried(or at least they didn't try hard) to keep 1114 away from the pyramid. If their climber had been working, I have no doubt that 610 would have been over there keeping 1114 off the pyramid.

Quarters 2-3. For a complete 2 vs. 3 match, the world champions win by 20 points. They barely won with 2630 almost completely disabled the entire match (including auto) and only managing to climb at the end. The world champs may have had good strategy for the other elimination matches, but they won with no small amount luck, preventing them from being the best theoretically.