![]() |
FrankAnswersFridays: October 25, 2013: Safety at Championships
http://www.usfirst.org/roboticsprogr...idays-10252013
Quote:
|
Re: FrankAnswersFridays: October 25, 2013: Safety at Championships
I can't tell from the response if he grasps the magnitude of the problem at hand here. Guiding people to the right place and having a few people try and ask people to slow down doesn't change the fundamental problem at hand: Thousands of people have a huge incentive to "get in first" in order to claim seating. This isn't something that can and should be fixed by "hey guys, don't run". A queue line for each division that lets people inside in an ordered fashion would do it. Probably takes the same number of extra people as other methods. You could gradually bring the lines in, let in 20 at a time every 30 seconds or so from each line, etc.
|
Re: FrankAnswersFridays: October 25, 2013: Safety at Championships
His response is flat out not true. As one of the first 50 or so people in line every day I am 100% sure there was no proper queue formed and that what he's calling "crowd control" was one rent-a-cop that yelled at people for standing on the brick area of the sidewalk while doing nothing to ensure that an orderly line was formed.
There was literally zero effort put into crowd control. Not only that, FIRST staff actually exacerbated the problem by standing at the front of the crowd and counting down to the doors opening, causing what amounted to a stampede. |
Re: FrankAnswersFridays: October 25, 2013: Safety at Championships
I came in the door a minute after it opened on Saturday and it was already madhouse getting in and over to the stands, only to see adults rolling out toilet paper in seats and yelling at each other and at children. Either I'm seeing things and need to see a doctor or they just don't see how intense the problem is...
|
Re: FrankAnswersFridays: October 25, 2013: Safety at Championships
I think the entrance to the pits was OK, but I was never over at the opening for seating.
|
Re: FrankAnswersFridays: October 25, 2013: Safety at Championships
Speaking of crowd control.
If they don't do something to fix that after-party, someone is going to get hurt. You simply cannot fit the entire Championship inside the science center. It was a recipe for a future disaster. They have now made (3) attempts at an after party with very limited success. The first two were OK but not great, but 2013 was just flat out unsafe. I sure hope they are brainstorming on the safety aspects of this issue, as well. |
Re: FrankAnswersFridays: October 25, 2013: Safety at Championships
Quote:
As for the initial seating stampede (and yes, some people really took it like that), I might suggest turnstiles at the door. Pain in the butt for those with things that roll, but for the teeming masses it forces them to go one at a time and not too fast. |
Re: FrankAnswersFridays: October 25, 2013: Safety at Championships
I agree with Chris and Cory, I'm not sure the message was received in terms of the severity of the issue and as Cory mentioned, what was in place could hardly be called crowd control.
I think that Joe brought up some good options that I was hoping Frank would respond to like wristbands or timed intervals. There needs to be a better system in place. Outside the venue isn't as important to me because once a system is in place to improve the initial rush, the outside queuing of teams will take care of itself. Asking teams to 'slow down' is not a solution. A few more stanchions or barriers outside is also not going to solve the problem. We know Frank is active on CD, can people post some ideas in this thread as possible solutions? I was thinking if it made sense to give teams blocks of seats in a vertical manner instead of horizontal. Meaning instead of very few teams taking all of the "good seats" up front, teams are given 2 wide blocks so teams can give preference to their scouters up front and rotate the good seats among themselves. For clarity? Imagine Team numbers 1-7 11223344556677 11223344556677 11223344556677 11223344556677 11223344556677 11223344556677 11223344556677 Instead of... 111111111111 333333333333 222222222222 444444444444 777777777777 666666666666 555555555555 Not sure if it's a good idea yet or not.... |
Re: FrankAnswersFridays: October 25, 2013: Safety at Championships
I would settle for a single, clearly demarcated pair of doors to the dome that will be opening, and a queue enclosed by a rope barrier or something that's long enough for a few thousand people to queue up.
Most of the safety hazards are caused by later-arriving teams skipping straight to the front and pushing through, and the crunch into the escalator and staircase since they are a bottleneck after too many doors are opened. |
Re: FrankAnswersFridays: October 25, 2013: Safety at Championships
Quote:
Still not foolproof, but I'll take people being idiots on a gently-sloped ramp over people being idiots on stairs and escalators. |
Re: FrankAnswersFridays: October 25, 2013: Safety at Championships
I think the biggest issue with finding seating in the morning isn't teams getting seating to watch the matches, it's scouts getting seating to watch the matches.
That being said, I would love to see a nice area of the stands devoted to scouting and scouting only. The other thing that I think can be done on a team level is educating your own teams on being professional during the mad morning rush. Don't take more seats than you need, and don't put your 40 students all in prime seating- put your scouts up front, your spirit gang can be in back. This also allows them to stand up without blocking other team's views. It's a win-win scenario. |
Re: FrankAnswersFridays: October 25, 2013: Safety at Championships
The Boston Regional (which no longer exists. The venue will now become the NE District Championships site) Did as best of job as possible that did help. They only allowed people to go in through one of the doors in the morning, where their was security checks which enforced a line. Once in the lobby, they wouldnt allow anyone to go up the stairs till a certain time. Once that time hit, everyone had to go through turnstyles to get to the stairs.
|
Re: FrankAnswersFridays: October 25, 2013: Safety at Championships
My biggest annoyance (as a volunteer) was the single entryway. The volunteer parking lot was on the complete opposite side of the arena. I don't know how many locked entrances I passed (with security personnel standing there watching me) and tried to enter with no success.
Yes. I'm whining. :D But seriously, having another entrance on the other side of the arena unlocked would be nice and would help alleviate some stampeding. |
Re: FrankAnswersFridays: October 25, 2013: Safety at Championships
What about a lottery system? Teams submit how many seats they need, then they are reserved. Period. No rush for anything since seats are predetermined.
|
Re: FrankAnswersFridays: October 25, 2013: Safety at Championships
I completely agree with TheCascadeKid's idea. I was thinking along similar lines. When you register for Champs you need to submit a total number attending and then you are randomly assigned a block of seats (and I really like the vertical as opposed to horizontal idea). I also suggest that this rotates by day so that one team does not end up with "the good seats" for the entire event.
Also....... We need to address the travesty of the mad seating rush for Einstein!!! What happens every year is that so many people rush for seats on Einstein that there is hardly anyone left watching the Archimedes, Newton, etc. finals and awards. This is a travesty! If people had pre-assigned seating for Einstein then they would all stay and watch those finals instead of all trampeling each other to get to the "big show" seating. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:25. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi