![]() |
Galileo - The Champion's Division
So I had a thought the other day. "What division has won the championship the most?"
Some quick counting revealed that: Galileo has won 5 times Newton has won 4 times Archimedes has won 2 times Curie has won 1 time I was surprised to see it wasn't Newton, but I kind of also figured that it would be a mix of all 4 divisions. |
Re: Galileo - The Champion's Division
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo - The Champion's Division
Galileo has also won the past three years, making them 3-0 in the St. Louis era.
|
Re: Galileo - The Champion's Division
I think the actual numbers are G-5, N-4, A-3, C-0. (assuming there were no division before 2001, anyone who's been around longer please correct me if I'm wrong)
Also note, Galileo has won 5 of the last 6, only to be upset by Newton in 2010. |
Re: Galileo - The Champion's Division
Intiresting, where did you get these numbers?
|
Re: Galileo - The Champion's Division
Galileo never won a championship until 2008.
Did they really win every championship from 2008-2013 except 2010? |
Re: Galileo - The Champion's Division
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo - The Champion's Division
Having been the VC for that field from 2006 - 2012, that sounds about right.
|
Re: Galileo - The Champion's Division
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo - The Champion's Division
Quote:
2001:N 2002:N 2003:A 2004:A 2005:N 2006:A 2007:N 2008:G 2009:G 2010:N 2011:G 2012:G 2013:G The BlueAlliance has no data for 2001, where did you get your information? |
Re: Galileo - The Champion's Division
What would be really interesting is knowing this with the context of when FIRST changed the sorting algorithm. (I forgot)
|
Re: Galileo - The Champion's Division
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo - The Champion's Division
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo - The Champion's Division
Quote:
|
Re: Galileo - The Champion's Division
This would never happen, but I'd like to see four experts (Karthik, Paul C, someone nominate two others?) each represent a division. They would then take turns drafting the entire division by whatever thought process they individually desired. Their own 4 teams would be not included in this draft, and then randomly assigned to the 4 after the divisions are set.
I think we'd see some incredibly balanced divisions in a way anything FIRST does could never match. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi