Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Back for more..VEXpro 2014 Product Unveiling (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=122129)

AdamHeard 12-12-2013 11:45

Re: Back for more..VEXpro 2014 Product Unveiling
 
I can't seem to find a CAD file for the versablocks on either site, has anyone found this?

AlecS 12-12-2013 11:51

Re: Back for more..VEXpro 2014 Product Unveiling
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AdamHeard (Post 1311218)
I can't seem to find a CAD file for the versablocks on either site, has anyone found this?

Oops. It's up on our site now on the Versa-Block page, here

Cory 12-12-2013 11:55

Re: Back for more..VEXpro 2014 Product Unveiling
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alpha Beta (Post 1311211)
We do not know the rules for 2014, so I'll ask this question in reference to last year. Would the PTO gear box from WCP have been legal in 2013? The gear box without pneumatic cylinders is around $350. With both cylinders it's $430-ish. You can purchase the gear box without them, but it won't function. Of course the same is true for motors and pinions. If you purchased the full assembly with pneumatics, motors and pinions for just over $525 would it have been legal?





PS. If FIRST had a goal of more teams doing their own design work they could lower the $400 limit. If they wanted to lessen the amount of design work they could raise it instead.

If VEX/WCP sold a $399 transmission with two CIM motors attached to it at a cost of $457, would you think that it violates the single component under $400 rule?

That's how I'd look at it. The piston is an externally attached COTS item that is being included for your convenience.

Akash Rastogi 12-12-2013 12:01

Re: Back for more..VEXpro 2014 Product Unveiling
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ben Martin (Post 1311209)
Thank you everyone at Vex Robotics/IFI for introducing all of these new products

And West Coast Products :)

Ben Martin 12-12-2013 12:04

Re: Back for more..VEXpro 2014 Product Unveiling
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Akash Rastogi (Post 1311231)
And West Coast Products :)

West Coast Products too! I haven't purchased from you guys before, I might have to give some of your items a try this year.

Jon Stratis 12-12-2013 12:05

Re: Back for more..VEXpro 2014 Product Unveiling
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alpha Beta (Post 1311211)
We do not know the rules for 2014, so I'll ask this question in reference to last year. Would the PTO gear box from WCP have been legal in 2013? The gear box without pneumatic cylinders is around $350. With both cylinders it's $430-ish. You can purchase the gear box without them, but it won't function. Of course the same is true for motors and pinions. If you purchased the full assembly with pneumatics, motors and pinions for just over $525 would it have been legal?





PS. If FIRST had a goal of more teams doing their own design work they could lower the $400 limit. If they wanted to lessen the amount of design work they could raise it instead.

The part that makes it legal is that the PTO is an add-on to an already, independently functional part. The gearbox can be used without the PTO and be fully functional So can the pneumatic cylinders. 2 of the 3 modules we're talking about (pneumatics, PTO, and gearbox) are usable in multiple configurations, so I don't think it falls into the trap of "modules are designed to assemble into a single configuration, and the assembly is functional in only that configuration"

JVN 12-12-2013 12:06

Re: Back for more..VEXpro 2014 Product Unveiling
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sdcantrell56 (Post 1311207)
Could you guys provide some of the information pertaining to HTD versus GT2 specifically in ratcheting performance? I tried finding data to back up the claim of HTD being better for rapid direction changes and can't find anything to substantiate this.

Hi Sean,
Unfortunately, I don't have a data sheet to back this up. We spoke directly with a few belt manufacturers, off the record on this topic.

Of course those users who would prefer GT2 belts can purchase them from any number of suppliers. VEXpro has chosen HTD based on the feedback we received, and some simple preliminary testing.

If you have any concerns, feel free to email prosupport@vex.com to discuss further.

-John

Andrew Lawrence 12-12-2013 12:09

Re: Back for more..VEXpro 2014 Product Unveiling
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sdcantrell56 (Post 1311207)
Could you guys provide some of the information pertaining to HTD versus GT2 specifically in ratcheting performance? I tried finding data to back up the claim of HTD being better for rapid direction changes and can't find anything to substantiate this.

While I don't have numbers to back this up, 256 made a belt drive in the offseason and tried out both HTD and GT2 belts and pulleys, and while the GT2 ratcheted when we went full forward to full reverse, the HTD stayed strong and kept its hold on the drive. I would definitely go with HTD again.

JVN 12-12-2013 12:12

Re: Back for more..VEXpro 2014 Product Unveiling
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alpha Beta (Post 1311211)
We do not know the rules for 2014, so I'll ask this question in reference to last year. Would the PTO gear box from WCP have been legal in 2013? The gear box without pneumatic cylinders is around $350. With both cylinders it's $430-ish. You can purchase the gear box without them, but it won't function. Of course the same is true for motors and pinions. If you purchased the full assembly with pneumatics, motors and pinions for just over $525 would it have been legal?





PS. If FIRST had a goal of more teams doing their own design work they could lower the $400 limit. If they wanted to lessen the amount of design work they could raise it instead.

Alpha Beta,
Good question. Of course -- we cannot comment on 2014 legality, but I appreciate your question was asked in reference to the 2013 rules:

The PTO shaft and associated components (VersaDog, etc) are easy to use by themselves without purchase of the entire WCD Dual Speed Gearbox. These items are sold as part of the 217-3636 kit for $74.99:
http://www.wcproducts.net/wcp-shifter-components/

Based on our interpretation of the 2013 rules, we believe these would have been legal for use last season, if they were around then. :)

-John

Akash Rastogi 12-12-2013 12:27

Re: Back for more..VEXpro 2014 Product Unveiling
 
I thought the tiny new hex broached VersaWheel was pretty cool. What led you guys to making it 3.25" in diameter? I'm glad it is available!

tim-tim 12-12-2013 12:58

Re: Back for more..VEXpro 2014 Product Unveiling
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Akash Rastogi (Post 1311250)
I thought the tiny new hex broached VersaWheel was pretty cool. What led you guys to making it 3.25" in diameter? I'm glad it is available!

So they can continue to make their drive modules lighter and more compact?

Chris is me 12-12-2013 13:29

Re: Back for more..VEXpro 2014 Product Unveiling
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Andrew Lawrence (Post 1311242)
While I don't have numbers to back this up, 256 made a belt drive in the offseason and tried out both HTD and GT2 belts and pulleys, and while the GT2 ratcheted when we went full forward to full reverse, the HTD stayed strong and kept its hold on the drive. I would definitely go with HTD again.

Could you post more information about your setup? Tooth count of both systems, pulley material, use of tensioners vs exact center, etc. We've had almost the exact opposite experience, but our experience is probably possibly user error rather than an accurate comparison.

Jared Russell 12-12-2013 13:37

Re: Back for more..VEXpro 2014 Product Unveiling
 
Given that HTD is at this point a de-facto standard while GT2 is a proprietary profile*, I don't think a lot of belt manufacturers would want to go on the record with an unbiased recommendation. Gates is going to say that GT2 is the way to go, while everyone else will say HTD.

In reality, a wise designer would probably want to have enough of a safety margin that either profile would not ratchet.

* A brief Google search couldn't confirm or deny this, but it is my recollection. I'm sure that CD will correct my statement if it is incorrect :)

Akash Rastogi 12-12-2013 13:49

Re: Back for more..VEXpro 2014 Product Unveiling
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tim-tim (Post 1311262)
So they can continue to make their drive modules lighter and more compact?

I meant more like is it intended for drive systems, or can we expect a line of smaller wheels coming out soon to compete with Banebots wheels for grippers and intakes and such. If so, that would be very cool.

lnex1357 12-12-2013 14:09

Re: Back for more..VEXpro 2014 Product Unveiling
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jared341 (Post 1311275)
In reality, a wise designer would probably want to have enough of a safety margin that either profile would not ratchet.

Jared,

I would agree with your statement completely. We on 2168 used the GT2 extruded stock and machined our own press fit colson hubs to drive GT2 15mm belts. We designed our wheel spacing for exact C-C distances for belt lengths supplied by SDP-si.

After about 60 hours of vigours driver practice including pushing matches practicing defense before bag and 7 competitions (on and off season), we have been still using the same exact belts in practice all fall and under finger pressure the belts will stretch no more than a .5 inches. Also despite our best efforts we have never produced the "ratcheting" effect.

We also used HTD back in 2012 for our shooter, and again designed with the proper C-C distances for a specific belt size, and once again after many hours of use, never had an issue with ratcheting. That robot was in a fundraiser last week with same belt and still shoots like a charm. :-)

In short, based on our experience, I would agree with JVN that both will do the job, just fine. But of course if you have the option you should buy HTD ;-)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:42.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi