Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Technical Discussion (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=22)
-   -   Modular Drive System (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=123409)

DavisDad 31-12-2013 16:18

Re: Modular Drive System
 
Since we’re designing around the Andy Mark (AM) 8” Mecanum wheel, I’m going look closely at the assembly of the delivered kit.
  1. I know there are issues with binding in the rollers if extra work isn’t done to prep the parts. I’ve looked at the video provided by AM: AM Video

    I found the all middle rollers very sticky. This was not metal-to-metal interference but plastic or rubber to the brass shaft. I tried the AM video method but had no luck and don’t understand what it’s supposed to do.

    I tried an 0.251” reamer to get a better fit (roller ID is ~ 0.0252”). This did not act as expected: once through with gentle rotation would reduce interference. What I found was rubber or adhesive like particles (no metal) on the reamer flutes (see photo below).



    Here's an AM drawing of middle roller with my mark-ups of dimensions I measured (approx. avg.):



    The metal bushing's ID is about 1 to 2 thousandths over the brass axle 0.250". The axles I measured have pretty good tolerances; eccentricity within about 0.0005". I don't think the binding I've found is a result of metal interference tolerances but from Polycarbonate
    Core molding operation. I used a 3/16" reamer, inserted up to the far bushing and scraped between bushings. This method combined with reaming bushings with 0.251 reamer, resulted in a fit where the axle would fall through with no force.

  2. I want to reduce the play in the middle roller and make the outer rollers spin better. See video:



More to follow...

DavisDad 01-01-2014 20:37

Re: Modular Drive System
 

geomapguy 01-01-2014 20:44

Re: Modular Drive System
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DavisDad (Post 1319258)

Is this designed for there to be a hopper or other structure in the open space connecting the two sides? If not, I'd recommend adding crossbars there as well for added support.

But looks good otherwise

DavisDad 01-01-2014 20:54

Re: Modular Drive System
 
Trying to use the space on the side and rear perimeter for electronics. The front is left open for game systems. The forward structure will be determined later by geometry of game systems. The wheel wells/gearboxes form the structural base for the box trusses on sides and rear ( truss bracing using 1/4" Al rod not drawn yet).

DavisDad 03-01-2014 12:31

Re: Modular Drive System
 
Changed gearbox to protect encoder

Previous:



Current:


DavisDad 03-01-2014 19:50

Re: Modular Drive System
 
Received the Matex planetary gear set:



Am ready to machine housing:


DavisDad 06-01-2014 09:36

Re: Modular Drive System
 

DavisDad 08-01-2014 16:42

Re: Modular Drive System
 
Oh boy! This year's game is very interesting regarding drive design. We're still scratching our heads over game play strategy. At first read of the rules, I thought this was going to be a heavy contact Hockey game where chassis strength would be essential. I had images of robots checking each other, pushing and shoving to get/deny the ball.

Our Regulatory Affairs Officer ;) says there will be almost no defense, but I'm still optimistic...

From our initial brain-storming, it looks like a ground level opening in the front could be a real asset. I also think a low clearance/CoG has very desirable. If they didn't cost so much, I'd switch from the 8" Mecanums (already purchased) with 6" size.

Our drive team are leaning toward using the AM KOP drive chassis with regular wheels. I'm trying to steer them away from 4-wheel tank drive because of ugly turning and pivoting performance. But, I'll continue working on the modular setup as a design exercise.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi