![]() |
Re: [FRC Blog] 2014 Game Hint
Quote:
Somebody else plotted it different. I only saved the link of the attachment not the whole post. But you can see what he did. It forms a rectangle. So the conclusion of the guy was: Triangle, Sphere, Rectangle = 3 game pieces. Triangle = Coordiantes google maps Sphere = Wolfram Alpha Rectangle = His plot Here is his plot: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/at...5&d=1387644692 |
Re: [FRC Blog] 2014 Game Hint
Quote:
Sphere- A single point was plotted on a sphere. The same could be done with any number. Rectangle- The rectangle was plotted by making a rectangle with dimensions that were the given numbers. Again, any set of three numbers could do this. What I'm trying to say is that if your game hint solution works with almost every set of three numbers, it might not be the solution. |
Re: [FRC Blog] 2014 Game Hint
If only it was a triangle, circle, rectangle... It would be just like the FIRST logo
|
Quote:
|
Re: [FRC Blog] 2014 Game Hint
Hello all.
Someone earlier said something about "Who's on FIRST?" Being a good game title. And that got me thinking about when it was created. Well, it was in 1938. (Source: http://thenostalgialeague.com/kwtnl/whos-on-first.html and Wikipedia, but I got lazy and didn't look it up again. ) That means that this year is the 75th anniversary. Someone might have hit a home run with that idea! (pun absolutely intended) Sorry if there are any mistakes, I'm on a cell phone. |
Re: [FRC Blog] 2014 Game Hint
First I would like to say that I do not believe there is a weight reduction for this game. In the north, they have weight reductions every spring when the ground thaws so that large trucks do not destroy the roads. We have enough torn up roads just from the freezing and thawing without large semis crushing them. So there are thousands of instances of weight reduction on roads, it is likely a coincident that picture was found.
I was thinking about game piece volume for the 3 numbers. What if there are 3 different sized game pieces and they gave us the volume for them? Those numbers seem pretty specific. Here was a calculation on volume with in^3 converting to the diameter of a sphere in inches: 144.4561403508771929 in^3 = 6.50997 inches (diameter) 31.13907284769211920 in^3 = 3.90333 inches (diameter) 3.943186131848665063 in^3 = 1.96012 inches (diameter) Now the numbers don't work out to a nice whole number, but maybe the game pieces have dimples or are in a 3D polygon shape. If so, these could be some of the smallest game pieces yet. The ~1.96 in (dia.) is slightly larger than a golf ball. With the objects being on the smaller side of things, I lean away from a stacking game. Certainly lean away from a shooting game (unless the numbers are the area of the targets). It seems to lean towards a placement game with smaller containers than are customary to past FRC games. Have a Merry Christmas! |
Re: [FRC Blog] 2014 Game Hint
Quote:
|
Re: [FRC Blog] 2014 Game Hint
Using my Little Orphan Annie Secret Decoder Ring, I have determined that the game hint reads:
"Be sure to drink your Ovaltine" ;) |
Re: [FRC Blog] 2014 Game Hint
8234/57
61126/1963 62326/15806 Fibonacci sequence: 1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89,134, etc. Feel free to do what you want with this information. This may be connected to fluid dynamics? |
Re: [FRC Blog] 2014 Game Hint
Quote:
|
Re: [FRC Blog] 2014 Game Hint
Quote:
This means one of two games. 1. Something involving a red ryder bb gun. Oops; this violates the spirit of FIRST so it cannot happen. 2. A football. My money is on #2. /end sarcasm |
Re: [FRC Blog] 2014 Game Hint
Hi FIRST community,
I will admit that I am usually one to stray away from threads full of mere speculation- Nonetheless, I present some thoughts... The Game Hint: The game hint seems to be a series of 3 numbers- My initial thoughts were coordinates (perhaps defining maximum X, Y and Z field dimension restrictions relative to the point 0,0,0 but the scale seems rather uncommon lest each value is in it's own specific unit [leave it to the GDC to be vague and "justified" in their hints]) My next thought was perhaps a scoring threshold, either pertaining to value or placement of game pieces; that too in my opinion can be denounced for proportions. Throwing those aside, I look to game trends Trends: So here is some speculation of my own- I don't think a stacking game is so far fetched. One such game I envision has the field strewn with crates (similar in design to milk crates) and numerous (90-200) balls of about 3 inches in diameter. The objective of the game would be to stack these crates with variable numbers of balls in them, thus scoring points determined by stack size, and ball content. The complications include dealing with upside down, sideways and irregular crates amongst "herds" of loose balls, the combination of which are difficult to navigate, and difficult to handle provided a versatile range of game pieces. Alliances would also need to be concerned with defending built stacks. (FIRST is decently rooted in providing irregular driving conditions; off the top of my head I list Maze Craze, and He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named (rhymes with "*unacy") Sorry for ranting, I guess we know why I try to stay away from these threads, |
Re: [FRC Blog] 2014 Game Hint
I think you just described the foundation of the 2011? FTC game, Bowled Over:) Thus the FRC GDC emulates the FTC GDC...
|
Re: [FRC Blog] 2014 Game Hint
Quote:
|
Re: [FRC Blog] 2014 Game Hint
Quote:
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 19:52. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi