Re: Legal ways of providing suction?
 

Could said shop-vac be disassembled and modified to use a CIM/Banebots/other legal motor?

In 2010 we went to Goodwill and bought a vacuum cleaner that we tore apart and used. The trick is interfacing an FRC legal motor. The best setup we could muster was a 1:1 direct drive setup running off very small timing belts. Those vacuum impellers need to spin at like 15k rpm to function properly.

I like the idea above about finding a vacuum that runs off a 500 series motor. That could make mounting an RS-550 or AndyMark 9015 somewhat trivial.

Re: Legal ways of providing suction?
 

It seems as though a compressor sucker may be the easiest because they will get high pressures and are easier to build. You have more leeway when working with these! Also, you don't need the 15k RPM which only those tiny motors can offer!

Re: Legal ways of providing suction?
 

Can you speak from experience? In MY experience, spanning years including 2004, 2008, AND 2007 (when suction cups were included in the KOP), the compressor-based systems didn't do very well. 2008 was particularly bad, given the cloth cover of the ball--which, I might add, is a larger version of this year's ball. In 2007, very few teams could get the KOP suction cups (Venturi devices) to work right--on inner tubes that were just about made for grabbing by suction. In 2004, if you couldn't get a good seal, you were not picking up the ball. OTOH, I saw at least one good suction cup that was a converted vacuum in 2004, and heard about another in 2008.


Different vacuums and impellers need different speeds. Maybe you don't need a 15K RPM impeller. Maybe a 4K one will do--but the impeller won't be the same as for the 15K one, I'll bet you that.

Re: Legal ways of providing suction?
 

You don't need high pressures. Using a 5 gallon paint bucket for a grabber, that's a 12" diameter circle, or about 110 square inches (sorry, I'm an Imperial thinker). Say you want a 30 pound force to hold the ball in place: that's about 1/4PSI, or about a 6" head of water.

What you need is a significant flow of air to pull the ball into place and establish the seal. Without that, you'll have to trap the ball against a surface before you'll be able to pick it up.

Re: Legal ways of providing suction?
 

any brand name suggestions for the 550-bearing models? Found coleman and itek pumps in 12v models. Maybe a $20 sacrifice will be worth it. :yikes:

Re: Legal ways of providing suction?
 

In 2010, we used a Black and Decker "Dustbuster" with good success.

You don't actually need for the donor vacuum to be 12V, as long as it has a 550 motor inside, as you'll be replacing the motor anyway. You'll need to take out the original motor and replace it with a 2014-legal motor. The BaneBots RS-540 / RS-550 or AndyMark 9015 motor (am-0912) would all be good choices.

The trick is that it will be very hard to guess what has a 550 motor without actually disassembling the vacuum. Buy a few until you find one that works. If nothing else, you'll have a clean build area! :-)

In any case, we disassembled the B&D "Dustbuster", keeping only the impeller and chamber around the impeller, and throwing everything else away.

It worked great for holding soccer balls in 2010. Initially, we used just a single stage with one motor/impeller. We later added a second stage with another motor/impeller.

We even tried out our 2010 vacuum on a 2008 trackball. (See photo.)

If it's not obvious from the photo, it worked!

Re: Legal ways of providing suction?
 

In 2008, the Red Barons used the suction unit from a whole house vacuum system. We powered it with a large CIM. And a large potato chip bowl was the suction cup. The suction aspect worked pretty well, but it was slow to acquire a ball.

Re: Legal ways of providing suction?
 

We used a 120 VAC "bucket vac", designed to fit atop a 5 gallon bucket, bought from Lowe's for $23. The motor was removed and replaced by a CIM, to excellent effect.

So long at you use an FRC-legal motor, you should be OK.