![]() |
G12 Clarification
1 Attachment(s)
I wanted to get everyone's opinion on G12. The attached image sums it up pretty well, but I will type it out here.
The blue alliance has one stationary robot with POSSESSION of the blue ball in the white zone. The red alliance has one robot with the red ball near its goal ready to score. If blue kicks the ball to an alliance partner in front of its goal and a red robot intentionally moves into the path of the ball changing the ball's trajectory. Per G12 is that “launching” (penalty) or “deflecting” (legal)? Note that this red robot is nowhere near its ball so there is no chance it is "playing its own ball" Yes I know that Q&A will have the final say. I just want to see what everyone here thinks. Thanks! -matto- |
Re: G12 Clarification
According to G12:
Quote:
|
Re: G12 Clarification
Quote:
|
Re: G12 Clarification
Playing devil's advocate G12 also says (emphasis mine)
“launching” (impelling BALLS to a desired location or direction) You could argue that the ball was directed to the desired location of "not to the second alliance mate" or "to the side or the arena, away from the second alliance mate" My thought was intentional direction of any kind of the opponent's ball would draw a penalty. I could be over thinking it and I expect GDC will clarify. |
Re: G12 Clarification
My interpretation of the way the GDC intends for this game to be played is that defense of this variety is both allowed and encouraged, though I agree the letter of the rule is a bit ambiguous.
Clearly, they don't intend for me to be grabbing, carrying or throwing my opponents BALLs, but I can't see them also meaning to discourage defensive bulldozing of an opponent's BALL. They seem to have tried to go in that direction with the blue box on the POSSESSION rule, but its a bit unclear how 'herding' will be called, both for the purposes of ASSISTs and for the purposes of POSSESSING and opponents BALL. |
Re: G12 Clarification
The way I've read the rule is that this could be legal and illegal. Two examples follow:
Legal: If the blue balls is in motion and hits a red robot, then it is considered deflection. Illegal: If the blue ball is in motion or stationary and a red robot hits the ball it is considered launching. *To put it short and sweet, ball hits robot, Legal. Robot hits ball, Illegal. |
Re: G12 Clarification
Quote:
|
Re: G12 Clarification
Insert usual GDC has the final say caveat and whatnot here....
I feel that it is impossible for your robot to be POSSESSING an opposing alliances ball if it contacts the ball on the side of the robot that is perpendicular to your drive base (for tank drives, it gets into more of a grey area if you are running mecs or swerve or something like that). This seems like the most logical ruling for gameplay as you could still block passes and passing lanes with your robot but you wouldn't be actively pushing the balls away from your opponent and locking down the only game piece in play. |
Re: G12 Clarification
My opinion* is that the red robot is bulldozing, which is not possession and therefore not a foul. Just because your alliance's ball is not near the red robot doesn't mean the only strategic advantage from the red robot moving is blocking the blue alliance's pass. The red robot could be setting up for the next cycle.
*I am not the GDC. My answer is not official. |
Re: G12 Clarification
I feel that if the red alliance robot is in the current path of the ball and it is deflected of that robot than it would be "bulldozing." If the red alliance robot purposely moves into the path of the ball after it has been launched then I would consider it "launching."
|
Re: G12 Clarification
I would say one instance of contact with the ball is a deflection, two or more is herding or launching.
|
Re: G12 Clarification
Quote:
|
Re: G12 Clarification
Quote:
|
Re: G12 Clarification
Quote:
Quote:
Go up to FIRST Q&A and submit for a rule clarification if you feel this definition is too loose (i'll admit, possession rules are kind of unclear and vague in my opinion as well.) |
Re: G12 Clarification
Rule G12, blue box, makes it pretty clear.
Quote:
But, if the red robot chases the blue ball and bumps it again, that could be interpreted as Herding, which is Possession, and that would get a penalty. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:37. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi