![]() |
Re: Team 314 Launcher
Quote:
|
Re: Team 314 Launcher
Quote:
|
Re: Team 314 Launcher
Quote:
is it a ball shifter(i was told that they wouldn't work) |
Re: Team 314 Launcher
Quote:
|
Re: Team 314 Launcher
Quote:
love the idea, think its genius! |
Re: Team 314 Launcher
Quote:
|
Re: Team 314 Launcher
Quote:
Granted it is a prototype, but I'm stating facts. The catapult system is ultimately unreliable if you cannot assert control over the x axis. With fine tuning yes, this will be rectified, but as to your prototype, it is inaccurate. Regardless of the facts, I do not find it appropriate for you to ridicule what is clearly my personal opinion. |
Re: Team 314 Launcher
Quote:
I would also ask which axis you are determining to be the x axis? I found this prototype to be quite accurate. In the initial shots it was not scoring... but as it moved in it was hitting nearly every time into the goal. After moving in the first time it showed that they had found something that was remarkable. The "sweet spot" was quite big. In this, I mean that the shooter could be several different distances from the goal, and still score. The purpose of the shooter is to score a goal. If it does that it is accomplishing the task. One can define this as accuracy. The goals have a quite large margin for error side to side. (Is this the x axis as you defined?) I found the shots to be quite precise by the standard definition ... given that they were moving up the apparatus by hand and often did not have it lined up quite the same. The ball was almost always in the same place in the goal and within 4-6 feet side to side. Please understand that no one is ridiculing your statement. I honestly took it for sarcasm also when I first read your statement that the prototype was inaccurate. I thought that their prototype was amazingly accurate and the discovery of the large "sweet spot" was an eye opener for me. Now my definition of accurate was being able to put the ball in the goal. Evidently you must have a different definition. That is fine. I showed this video to all of my designers... I thought it was remarkable to see the evidence that a shot could be taken from a number of different distances with the same stroke and power and still be successful. This changes the way I see the game being played. It also may explain why there are no safe/protected zones. With goals as wide as these and the evidence in this video about what CAN be done with a simple launcher it changes the way I think offense will be done in the scoring zone. Thank you for your comments |
Re: Team 314 Launcher
We viewed it as a "good launcher" based on it making it in the goal from a relatively good spread, "sweet spot". The misses were part of our data, we needed to know that we could not make it from under the truss, the location of our first miss. I was in no way attacking, you have your opinion. I would like to see your teams launcher though, it has to be amazing. I am dead serious about that too, maybe link to it after season starts???
Thanks, Ronnie. |
Re: Team 314 Launcher
Quote:
If you intend to honestly say that "the entire goal is the single point of fire" then I am truly concerned as to your professionalism as a team. If you want to settle for just the goal as a posed to where in the goal, that's your decision. Simply put however, you must recognize that other robots will we doing considerably more. The x-axis is left right by the way. Basic Geometry so I'm sure you know this. Just clarifying that I know what I'm saying. Based on the direction being fired the ball had a most apparent tendency to curve in the air. True, averaging out all of your shots fired would result in a single point, which may be dead in front of your robot. However the target direction and the acquired result differed far too greatly at a distance. Even up close the x axis varies. You can never know how the game will play out and what will matter in the heat of the moment, and a short falling like that can and would be exploited. |
Re: Team 314 Launcher
Quote:
|
Re: Team 314 Launcher
Quote:
:D |
Re: Team 314 Launcher
How did you guys figure out the curvature of your catapult arm?
|
Re: Team 314 Launcher
Quote:
|
Re: Team 314 Launcher
The majority of our side to side inaccuracy was due to the inconsistencies of the prototype. The wooden frame being held down by two people on tile as well as the shooter being released by one hand before the other. The shots were consistent, the direction the shooter was not. The three or four inches the front of the robot turned side to side becomes three or four feet side to side when shooting from 20 feet out.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 14:39. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi