Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Technical Discussion (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=22)
-   -   Jaguars and Talons (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=124782)

FS Robotics 16-01-2014 21:37

Jaguars and Talons
 
Are Jaguars and Talons compatible? Nothing that I have found shows that there are any key differences that would create problems if we used both on the same bot, but I'm curious if anyone has insight on this. Thanks!

geomapguy 16-01-2014 21:38

Re: Jaguars and Talons
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by FS Robotics (Post 1328318)
Are Jaguars and Talons compatible? Nothing that I have found shows that there are any key differences that would create problems if we used both on the same bot, but I'm curious if anyone has insight on this. Thanks!

Depends how you want to use them.

-Mixing in the drivetrain - NO

-Elsewhere - Sure, unless the two motors are sharing the same load

Ether 16-01-2014 21:50

Re: Jaguars and Talons
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by geomapguy (Post 1328319)
Depends how you want to use them.

-Mixing in the drivetrain - NO

Why not?

Quote:

-Elsewhere - Sure, unless the two motors are sharing the same load
Why not?



geomapguy 16-01-2014 22:07

Re: Jaguars and Talons
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ether (Post 1328327)
Why not?



Why not?



Well Ether,

I would suspect because the motor curves are different??

What's the exact explanation or correction?

yash101 16-01-2014 22:14

Re: Jaguars and Talons
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by geomapguy (Post 1328335)
Well Ether,

I would suspect because the motor curves are different??

What's the exact explanation or correction?

He means the controller curve. A Victor has a different curve from the Talon, which has a different curve from the Jaguar. Mix up the motor controllers and some motors are not spinning as fast as others, causing strafing in the drivetrain, or abrasion in a motor set, when a motor needs to fight the less power being received by a different motor. In real life, while these issues are quite minimal because a lot of work is done to make the curve more linear, It isn't what you want for precision operation!

The code is something that hasn't been discussed too much. Using the same motor controller for at least a specific component will ensure that the code stays cleaner and easier to understand. You don't want to look at programming jargon, where half a subsystem runs code for a Victor/Talon, and the other half runs the Jaguars. That just becomes very messy and can be hard to understand.

Ether 16-01-2014 22:29

Re: Jaguars and Talons
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by geomapguy (Post 1328335)
I would suspect because the motor curves are different??

It's OK to combine motors with different motor curves.

For example, a CIM and a mini-CIM on the same gearbox.



geomapguy 16-01-2014 22:30

Re: Jaguars and Talons
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ether (Post 1328342)
It's OK to combine motors with different motor curves.

For example, a CIM and a mini-CIM on the same gearbox.



My bad, as Yash 101 said, I meant controller curves

Ether 16-01-2014 22:31

Re: Jaguars and Talons
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by geomapguy (Post 1328343)
My bad, as Yash 101 said, I meant controller curves

So why is that not OK,if it's OK to combine motors with different curves?



geomapguy 16-01-2014 22:36

Re: Jaguars and Talons
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ether (Post 1328345)
So why is that not OK,if it's OK to combine motors with different curves?



Hmmm good point. I just always assumed it was just bad practice.

SO does it have much effect???

Ether 16-01-2014 22:43

Re: Jaguars and Talons
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by geomapguy (Post 1328349)
Hmmm good point. I just always assumed it was just bad practice.

SO does it have much effect???

If you're trying to do closed-loop control there might be situations where it might be preferable to match the controllers.

Hey CD, any teams out there who used 1 Jag and 1 Talon for each 2-CIM gearbox on each side ?




Rynocorn 17-01-2014 13:38

Re: Jaguars and Talons
 
Slightly different but same principal I guess: This year we had 3 884 victors from vex and then 1 884 from Ifi and there was a significant difference in our drive train as it would turn ever slightly to the side. However, those were not jaguars or talons so not sure about that combination of those two. Also, all of the victors were tested beforehand and worked well. Just figured this would help a bit even if it wasn't what you were looking for exactly

geomapguy 17-01-2014 13:51

Re: Jaguars and Talons
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rynocorn (Post 1328506)
3 884 victors from vex and then 1 884 from Ifi

Well........IFI owns VEXPro so essentially it was just an older 884 and a newer one. There was a year there where they rebranded their stuff. So accordingly, we have IFI spikes and VexPro Spikes

Ether 17-01-2014 14:13

Re: Jaguars and Talons
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rynocorn (Post 1328506)
This year we had 3 884 victors from vex and then 1 884 from Ifi and there was a significant difference in our drive train as it would turn ever slightly to the side.

Unless you swapped the two left-side Vics with the two right-side ones and observed that the problem switched sides, you can't conclude that the turning was caused by a difference in the Vics.



nuggetsyl 17-01-2014 15:49

Re: Jaguars and Talons
 
You could run unmatched tires on your car but I would not recommend it.

Ether 17-01-2014 16:44

Re: Jaguars and Talons
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nuggetsyl (Post 1328569)
You could run unmatched tires on your car but I would not recommend it.

Not analogous.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 17:26.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi