![]() |
Is a bearing a "minor protusion"?
Before I ask Q&A........
The Kit of parts chassis has a bearing flange outside of the flat face of the frame on each side. If it's not considered a minor protrusion per R2, then it must be covered with a legal bumper since it would be considered a side of the perimeter. What do you think - does the bumper need to cover the entire side of the robot or can the bearing be left uncovered? |
Re: Is a bearing a "minor protusion"?
As an inspector I've always ruled this as a minor protrusion.
|
Re: Is a bearing a "minor protusion"?
I would consider this a minor protrusion. The bearing flange has a much lower profile than a bolt head sticking out.
I would also pass that for inspection. |
Re: Is a bearing a "minor protusion"?
I know what they say about assuming but I would assume that the KoP drive train that they give teams to make with instructions would be legal to easily pass inspection.
|
Re: Is a bearing a "minor protusion"?
I've noticed inspectors have been a little more relaxed with robot size rules since using perimeter. When we had "the box", bolt heads counted as part of the robot. Not because that's how the rules were, but because the box incorrectly enforced the rules. Bolt heads on the other side of your robot (the side facing the lexan) counted against your width (and I got into an argument about it in 2012 with the LRI).
|
Re: Is a bearing a "minor protusion"?
Quote:
2012: Quote:
Quote:
Now, there is no size requirement on the robot - the size requirement is on the frame perimeter. That's the distinction that allows bolt heads to stick out even if your frame perimeter is at exactly 112". And trust me... No one was happier than the inspectors when we got rid of the sizing box! |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:24. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi