![]() |
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
Quote:
If two drivetrains exactly the same in traction, weight, gear ratios were in a push off/breaker cook race and the only difference is the motor count (lets say a 4 cim versus a 6 cim), the 4 cim drivetrain will pop its breakers faster. The 6 cims will have less current going through the individual 40a breakers (total flow divided by 6 instead of 4), and slightly less through the main breaker (because they should be running at a slightly higher efficiency). My assumption why people pop breakers with 6 cims faster than 4 cims is because they think they can push while geared high, when really both systems are limited by their breakers. So you would need the correct gearing in either case to be a good pushing robot. |
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
Quote:
With 6 full size CIMs on drive, you can trip the main doing full forward to full reverse. It's scary to think it could happen in a competition. Also, once you've driven for a minute or so, you can get the battery voltage low enough to cause the radio to drop out. Those CIMs can draw 100 amps at stall. It'll take a few seconds for the 40 amps to start tripping, but the 120 amp breaker trips quickly when you try to put 600 amps through it.... |
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
Quote:
If I had two CIMs, I would need to have 16 times the torque from one CIM, or because their torque adds together, I would need 8 times the torque from two CIMs. So, I would put these two CIMs in an 8:1 gear reduction. The second, 8:1 gear reduction with 2 CIMs will have the same amount of torque at the wheels (16 times the torque directly from a CIM) as the 16:1 with a single CIM, but the 8:1 will go twice as fast. What you said in your previous post was correct, you need proper gearing to take advantage of your motors. |
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
I think that a brown-out and re-set of the cRIO is a very likely drivetrain induced failure. Not just the breakers blowing. I don't know which one, 6cim or 4cim, would be more likely to trigger a brown-out, though I think a brown-out or low-voltage reset is much more likely than blowing a main breaker.
Full disclosure: I have not a lot of experience blowing 40A breakers, or main breakers for that matter. I've always geared transmissions on robots a little conservatively, prioritizing robustness over ultimate performance. One robot team 95 made had issues with that, a full 4-wheel swerve in 2003, that could drain a battery down to the point of brown-out half-way through a match. |
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
Quote:
Popping that is quite a scary thought... |
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
Quote:
Quote:
Oh, and for those of you that might not have noticed, I did update the OP with some specs. |
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
Quote:
This tradeoff is something teams should carefully analyze and play with when deciding to use a 6 motor drive. Study the breaker spec sheets, both 40A and 120A. Experiment with different motors or robot cooling systems. Run a shifter and push in low gear. There are a lot of ways to try and mitigate this potential pitfall. (By the way, consider running a low gear that is traction limited with each motor drawing, say, 30 amps instead of 40, if you are extra paranoid) |
Re: pic: Did Somebody Say Defense Game?
Quote:
They could push for the entire season and not break a sweat with the motors, breakers, or batteries. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:22. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi