Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Robot Showcase (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=58)
-   -   Robowranglers 2014: Vader (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=126696)

RachelDoby 17-02-2014 20:36

Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 

Jibri Wright 17-02-2014 20:41

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Oh dude, sweet...

Whippet 17-02-2014 20:41

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Well...

*collects jaw from floor*

Mike Starke 17-02-2014 20:42

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Awesome job guys! Very well put together video as well!

techtiger1 17-02-2014 20:43

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Really 148 went with that collector. :o

BigJ 17-02-2014 20:45

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Come now, we all know that in his time as Darth Vader he only used one lightsaber. I suggest one of the el toro arms be taken off. ;)

dodar 17-02-2014 20:46

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BigJ (Post 1344883)
Come now, we all know that in his time as Darth Vader he only used one lightsaber. I suggest one of the el toro arms be taken off. ;)

Or rename it Darth Maul.

DampRobot 17-02-2014 20:50

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Very nice. It's always a treat to see the great production in your reveal videos.

Electronica1 17-02-2014 20:53

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
I have to ask, how does the articulation for the strafing wheel work (I noticed the 2 strafing wheels but it looks like they are both not on the ground at the same time)?:confused:

APettinger 17-02-2014 20:59

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Tumbleweed, Tornado, Armadillo, Raptor, Scorpion, Viper, Vader!? :D

geomapguy 17-02-2014 21:01

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
In awe!!

P.J. 17-02-2014 21:21

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by APettinger (Post 1344891)
Tumbleweed, Tornado, Armadillo, Raptor, Scorpion, Viper, Vader!? :D

I noticed that as well, why the deviation from the Texas theme?

Basel A 17-02-2014 21:25

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by P.J. (Post 1344906)
I noticed that as well, why the deviation from the Texas theme?

Raptor = Texas? Or Tornado? This isn't a deviation.

Hallry 17-02-2014 21:26

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Basel A (Post 1344912)
Raptor = Texas? Or Tornado? This isn't a deviation.

Western, desert, desolate...Texas. ;)

Boe 17-02-2014 21:28

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Electronica1 (Post 1344889)
I have to ask, how does the articulation for the strafing wheel work (I noticed the 2 strafing wheels but it looks like they are both not on the ground at the same time)?:confused:

I'd also love to here a bit more insight about the strafe wheels and how/why the articulate between multiple wheels

JohnFogarty 17-02-2014 21:30

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
That shot at the end. I know that's going to be even more popular now.

XaulZan11 17-02-2014 21:33

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Boe (Post 1344917)
I'd also love to here a bit more insight about the strafe wheels and how/why the articulate between multiple wheels

Me too, especially with the mecanum wheels at 5 seconds.

cmrnpizzo14 17-02-2014 21:35

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnFogarty (Post 1344921)
That shot at the end. I know that's going to be even more popular now.

That play in general will be a lot more powerful than people were thinking at the beginning of the year. If you have a human player that is used to it, you can get easy truss points and you won't lose control of the ball.

P.J. 17-02-2014 21:36

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Basel A (Post 1344912)
Raptor = Texas? Or Tornado? This isn't a deviation.

Parts of Texas are in the area of the country known as "Tornado Alley." As for Raptor I think when they released it they said the name was a reference to the predatory birds, not the dinosaurs, also a feature in Texas.

Plus I believe in the past they've said their robot names have followed a Texas theme, but I may be imagining that.

Electronica1 17-02-2014 21:41

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by XaulZan11 (Post 1344925)
Me too, especially with the mecanum wheels at 5 seconds.


Those mecanum wheels are on a drive in a day frame, and I am pretty sure the final robot had omni wheels. Also, I think their frame has 6 sides unlike the one they had mecanum wheels on.

XaulZan11 17-02-2014 21:44

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Electronica1 (Post 1344935)
Those mecanum wheels are on a drive in a day frame, and I am pretty sure the final robot had omni wheels. Also, I think their frame has 6 sides unlike the one they had mecanum wheels on.

Yeah, I believe you are correct. I'd be very interesting to hear from 148 about how this drive differs from their 2010, prior butterflies and a straight up mecanum and why they picked it.

Hallry 17-02-2014 21:50

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by P.J. (Post 1344906)
I noticed that as well, why the deviation from the Texas theme?

Ah, well this clears it up... :rolleyes:

P.J. 17-02-2014 21:50

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hallry (Post 1344942)
Ah, well this clears it up... :rolleyes:

Ohhhhh. It totally makes sense now!

BJC 17-02-2014 21:53

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Looking great guys!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Electronica1 (Post 1344889)
I have to ask, how does the articulation for the strafing wheel work (I noticed the 2 strafing wheels but it looks like they are both not on the ground at the same time)?:confused:

It looks like the axle that the little two-wheel fork is on is also the axle through which the wheels are powered. As a result when the motors spin the fork rotates until it hits the ground. Once the fork can't go further down the wheels are forced to rotate by the same motor. If that is the case its a pretty cool system.

Off to watch the video some more..
Cheers, Bryan

Electronica1 17-02-2014 22:02

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BJC (Post 1344946)
Looking great guys!



It looks like the axle that the little two-wheel fork is on is also the axle through which the wheels are powered. As a result when the motors spin the fork rotates until it hits the ground. Once the fork can't go further down the wheels are forced to rotate by the same motor. If that is the case its a pretty cool system.

Off to watch the video some more..
Cheers, Bryan

I am thinking the same thing, but I am having issues see how they are getting enough force to give the wheel traction because won't most the weight still be on the 4 outer wheels?

RachelDoby 17-02-2014 22:35

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Electronica1 (Post 1344948)
I am thinking the same thing, but I am having issues see how they are getting enough force to give the wheel traction because won't most the weight still be on the 4 outer wheels?


mwtidd 17-02-2014 22:39

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
I noticed a rangefinder on the front of the bot. Could that be an autocatch feature?

Electronica1 17-02-2014 23:23

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RachelDoby (Post 1344954)

So... I guess this means BJC was spot on. I just have to ask, why?

Jeffy 17-02-2014 23:24

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
This is awesome. I appreciate the early post. The subtle changes over the "BoomDone" robot are awesome and are clearly well thought out. Good luck this year!

Abhishek R 18-02-2014 00:01

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
I spy a Day[9] shirt.

pfreivald 18-02-2014 00:14

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cmrnpizzo14 (Post 1344928)
That play in general will be a lot more powerful than people were thinking at the beginning of the year. If you have a human player that is used to it, you can get easy truss points and you won't lose control of the ball.

I'd be amazed if any of the elite teams didn't plan on it from day one.

Great video, and great looking robot, 148!

bEdhEd 18-02-2014 00:40

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
This team is where Rosie the Riveter gets her rivets. Anyone know how many are on this robot?

Duncan Macdonald 18-02-2014 00:58

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lineskier (Post 1344958)
I noticed a rangefinder on the front of the bot. Could that be an autocatch feature?

I would put my money on detecting ball acquisition in auto.

AlecMataloni 18-02-2014 01:41

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
This is totally fake. Where's the secret endgame mechanism? I refuse to believe that 148 would ignore the point bonus that we don't know about yet.

CalTran 18-02-2014 01:51

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Anyone able to enlighten me on why the bowed out frame? I would imagine there's some reason...

MrRiedemanJACC 18-02-2014 07:29

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Care to share material is on the el toro?

Edit - added:

Btw nice job on the mechanism that "narrows" up the sticks while it lowers. Very slick and one of those things that you don't notice at first.

chrisfl 18-02-2014 08:27

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Go to 1:24. it looks as if they have a high traction/mecanum drivetrain

Tom Line 18-02-2014 09:01

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Electronica1 (Post 1344948)
I am thinking the same thing, but I am having issues see how they are getting enough force to give the wheel traction because won't most the weight still be on the 4 outer wheels?

It depends on the angle of the fork. As the wheels turn, if they are geared correctly, they will actually try to walk down more under the robot and put additional force on themselves. Think of the way that a rear wheel drive car transfers weight to the rear when it accelerates. In this case you aren't shifting the robots weight, you're using the leverage of the drive to push down into the floor harder.

As to the why: every tried to get 5 legs of a stool all the same length? Articulating that wheel is necessary - pneumatically or otherwise. I'd guessing this is a way of not using more pneumatics.

We have a little bit of familiarity with a slide-drivetrain. We tried one in 2008 but we hard-connected the wheels to the frame and quickly discovered why you absolutely MUST have mechanical compliance to insure all the wheels are on the ground. What they have here appears to be a refinement of their 2010 drivetrain.

PAR_WIG1350 18-02-2014 12:07

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Line (Post 1345108)
As to the why: every tried to get 5 legs of a stool all the same length? Articulating that wheel is necessary - pneumatically or otherwise. I'd guessing this is a way of not using more pneumatics.

:yikes: That makes so much sense.

Abhishek R 18-02-2014 12:11

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Line (Post 1345108)
As to the why: every tried to get 5 legs of a stool all the same length? Articulating that wheel is necessary - pneumatically or otherwise. I'd guessing this is a way of not using more pneumatics.

We have a little bit of familiarity with a slide-drivetrain. We tried one in 2008 but we hard-connected the wheels to the frame and quickly discovered why you absolutely MUST have mechanical compliance to insure all the wheels are on the ground. What they have here appears to be a refinement of their 2010 drivetrain.

Could you expand a bit more on why the hard-connected version didn't work and why the center wheel must be articulated? It seems to me if you just had it dropped enough the hard-connection would work.

Electronica1 18-02-2014 12:18

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Line (Post 1345108)
As to the why: every tried to get 5 legs of a stool all the same length? Articulating that wheel is necessary - pneumatically or otherwise. I'd guessing this is a way of not using more pneumatics.

We have a little bit of familiarity with a slide-drivetrain. We tried one in 2008 but we hard-connected the wheels to the frame and quickly discovered why you absolutely MUST have mechanical compliance to insure all the wheels are on the ground. What they have here appears to be a refinement of their 2010 drivetrain.

I meant why as in why do this method over, lets say, spring loading it. I understand with H drive you want to have the center wheel always against the ground, however, my team's FTC team did an h drive with the center wheel drop a 1/16 of an inch and it worked pretty well. I am just curious about why use a "floating" center module rather than a spring loaded module? Was the reasoning so they could drift when the center motors were not running?

Tom Line 18-02-2014 12:25

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Abhishek R (Post 1345256)
Could you expand a bit more on why the hard-connected version didn't work and why the center wheel must be articulated? It seems to me if you just had it dropped enough the hard-connection would work.

Abishek,

It's impossible to have all the wheels touch the floor at the same time, because the floor isn't perfectly flat. As a result, there are times where a non-articulated center wheel will be lifting one side of the drive train off the floor, so that you end up going in circles when you try to drive forward.

I can't see the mechanism well, but I wonder if it doesn't use torsion springs to return it to level so it isn't touching the floor when it isn't running.

Electronica1: I'd venture a guess that your drifting hypothesis is correct. They've seemed to enjoy drifting - I remember them doing it quite a bit in 2011.

Canon reeves 18-02-2014 12:31

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Someone needs to let disney know that this robot will be in their movie. Not a question, a statement!:p

BBray_T1296 18-02-2014 12:35

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
If you are putting weight on a wheel that is not driving (Ie an omni wheel pointed sideways) that is weight that is not being put on the wheels that are driving. friction=coefficient*Normal, so the more weight on the HT wheels, the more traction, and thus the more pushing power.

While the /H/ leg of the drivetrain is not being run, those wheels are entirely off of the ground, thus they are not detracting from the weight on the traction wheels.

waialua359 18-02-2014 12:35

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Great job on the Robot and Video release!
I guess I'm late to the party.

Aren Siekmeier 18-02-2014 12:38

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BBray_T1296 (Post 1345273)
If you are putting weight on a wheel that is not driving (Ie an omni wheel pointed sideways) that is weight that is not being put on the wheels that are driving. friction=coefficient*Normal, so the more weight on the HT wheels, the more traction, and thus the more pushing power.

While the /H/ leg of the drivetrain is not being run, those wheels are entirely off of the ground, thus they are not detracting from the weight on the traction wheels.

I'm willing to bet an even bigger reason was so they could still power slide with the strafe module off the ground.

Abhishek R 18-02-2014 13:05

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Line (Post 1345265)
Abishek,

It's impossible to have all the wheels touch the floor at the same time, because the floor isn't perfectly flat. As a result, there are times where a non-articulated center wheel will be lifting one side of the drive train off the floor, so that you end up going in circles when you try to drive forward.

I can't see the mechanism well, but I wonder if it doesn't use torsion springs to return it to level so it isn't touching the floor when it isn't running.

Electronica1: I'd venture a guess that your drifting hypothesis is correct. They've seemed to enjoy drifting - I remember them doing it quite a bit in 2011.

I see, thanks for the explanation.

barn34 18-02-2014 14:38

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
I'm surprised I'm the first to go there yet, but....

Impressive. Most Impressive.

In all seriousness, another awesome job from 148, per usual. Hoping to see this Sith beast up close and personal at championships. :)

roystur44 18-02-2014 14:53

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Nice job,

How does the pneumatic controlled tensioning for the catapult work out? I see it's on a pulley. Do you get a good variation on a shot?

Connor Mulkey 19-02-2014 19:09

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
You guys need to find a way to actually light up the intake rollers like lightsabers. I'm too attached to that image for it to be any other way. Get on that! :P

DanielPlotas 19-02-2014 19:31

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dodar (Post 1344884)
Or rename it Darth Maul.

but maul had a double-sided saber, not two. i would suggest Ahsoka Tano, but i am no fan of the clone wars series.

nxtmonkeys 19-02-2014 19:55

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
"known well, many jedi are not. secrecy they live in much."


-Yoda

















(not really, but it sounds nice, doesn't it? well, I'm trying to say that you could make up a new name if you wanted to.)

RachelDoby 22-02-2014 16:40

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BigJ (Post 1344883)
Come now, we all know that in his time as Darth Vader he only used one lightsaber. I suggest one of the el toro arms be taken off. ;)

We tried to intake with just one lightsaber. It doesn't work as well as we'd hoped.

The team was inspired by the look of the intake to create a Star Wars theme. After deciding on the design, we voted on the robot name. Thus, Vader was born.

Quote:

Originally Posted by techtiger1 (Post 1344881)
Really 148 went with that collector. :o

We were inspired by the BOOM DONE intake, El Toro. After testing lots of different intakes, we decided that this design was best fit for all of the things we wanted to accomplish. As you can see, we are not the only team that felt this way.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lineskier (Post 1344958)
I noticed a rangefinder on the front of the bot. Could that be an autocatch feature?

Yes, the range finder is an autocatch feature. Our operator holds down a button when catching is appropriate, and when the balls lands in our cradle, the lightsabers close onto the ball to secure it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by roystur44 (Post 1345382)
Nice job,

How does the pneumatic controlled tensioning for the catapult work out? I see it's on a pulley. Do you get a good variation on a shot?

We have two surgical tubing settings, one normal, and one we refer to as "The Force". The normal one is when the cylinder is retracted, and for longer shots we "use the force".

RachelDoby 22-02-2014 16:58

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
As for the questions about the choice of our robot name, we've never in the past committed to a Texas theme.

After seeing our intake design we decided as a team to do a Star Wars theme. So far this year, we're really enjoying all of the goofy things we are able to do with the name.

Certain team mentors have decided to veto any mention of... the other 3 movies.

RachelDoby 22-02-2014 17:28

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Regarding our drivetrain, Vader uses the next iteration of our articulating drivetrain, originating with the one used on our 2010 robot: Armadillo. In 2010 we used a drivetrain, referred to as the Nonadrive, that consisted of a five omni wheel H-drive, plus four traction wheels for optional pushing.

In the new iteration, the "Decadrive", we are using a Nonadrive with two center wheels instead of one. The two center wheels freely pivot about a gear that is powered by the CIMs. There are no separate actuators to move these wheels up and down, they are tilted by the drive CIMs. When the drive motors power it one way, the wheels pivot, such that when one wheel contacts the ground, we are able to strafe sideways.

The cool thing about this drivetrain is that when the center wheels are not in use, they don't touch the ground and as such do not interfere with the normal forward-backward driving (and they don't get in the way of our sweet power-slides). However, when one side one the module is dropped, the wheel digs in and tries to force itself downward, thus lifting up the robot, and allowing us to easily crab across the field.

Depending on which way the drive motors move, it drops the wheel which will naturally want to "dig in". We think this is pretty cool.

lukedude43 23-03-2014 15:17

Re: Robowranglers 2014: Vader
 
Out of curiosity, how much force is that surgical tubing generating?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 14:08.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi