![]() |
Chain Guard
Is it required by the rules to have a chain guard covering a chain that runs at a low rpm (the chain is not on our drive train)?
Thanks in advance, Bobby -Team 4601 |
Re: Chain Guard
R08:
Quote:
When looking at runs of chains, inspectors look at the possibility of injury more than anything else - there's no easier way to lose a finger than having a chain yank it through a sprocket. As far as that is concerned, speed isn't really much of a question. A slow moving chain and sprocket can cause damage just like a fast moving one. If at all possible, add a cover to it to make it safe! |
Re: Chain Guard
Quote:
There is no specific mention of chain guards anywhere in the rules as far as I know, but it falls under the more general rule about your robot not being 'unsafe'. |
Re: Chain Guard
I have never seen a team be forced to put a chain guard on at any comp. I do know last year they had teams put on guards for their shooter wheels though i think that that was because those components on most robots were easily accessible and prone to mishaps
If you feel it is unsafe then you should probably add a guard if possible |
Re: Chain Guard
The chain is on a PG71 motor (running at about 30% power through code), which has a 16.6 ft-lb stall torque. The chain itself turns a ramp that loads and then changes firing angle on our catapult launcher.
|
Re: Chain Guard
"Safe" is ultimately up the lead robot inspector. Generally speaking chain drives that are buried won't get questioned. Something that is exposed like on a manipulator that goes outside frame perimeter is going to get looked at a lot more closely.
|
Re: Chain Guard
Quote:
|
Re: Chain Guard
Quote:
If there are spinning wheels, or spinning chain, and it's easy to get a finger simulator (3/4" dowel works well) in there, anticipate being asked to put a guard on. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 15:13. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi