Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Extra Discussion (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=68)
-   -   paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=127290)

Ether 27-02-2014 18:21

paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
 
Thread created automatically to discuss a document in CD-Media.

Parabolic Trajectory Calculations by Ether

Ether 27-02-2014 18:23

Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
 

For those of you who downloaded the Parabolic vs Air Drag Trajectory spreadsheet, please note that I just uploaded revB to correct a small error. The user input "launch height" was not being imported into the parabola equation.


Ether 28-02-2014 12:07

Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ether (Post 1350695)
For those of you who downloaded the Parabolic vs Air Drag Trajectory spreadsheet, please note that I just uploaded revB to correct a small error. The user input "launch height" was not being imported into the parabola equation.

I should have mentioned:
The parabola plot with the original version was correct as long as you didn't change the launch height.

And even if you did change the launch height, the error affected only the parabola, not the air-drag trajectory.



Hugh Meyer 04-03-2014 09:55

Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
 
Ether,

Would you more clearly define the launch angle? A drawing would be nice. Is that from the horizon, or a plumb line? Thanks.

-Hugh

Ether 04-03-2014 10:19

Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh Meyer (Post 1353225)
Would you more clearly define the launch angle? Is that from the horizon, or a plumb line?

It's the elevation angle (from the horizontal).

The reason you don't see the graph appear to visually correspond to the launch angle is because the X and Y axes are not scaled equally, and when you change the launch angle the scaling auto-adjusts to fit the graph.

While you're here, does your team happen to have any test data to confirm (or refute) the 37 ft/sec terminal velocity number for this year's game piece?


Hugh Meyer 04-03-2014 10:36

Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
 
Thank you.

We do not have any data, but we have been talking about it. How would we measure the terminal velocity?

-Hugh

marccenter 04-03-2014 12:23

Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
 
Ether,

The assumption appears reasonable with the shooting range we are seeing on our robot.

I just found the thread today. When we unbag the robot on Saturday, I will be attempting to increase our shooting percentage via angle and may be able to provide some data after that point.

We did overshoot the target a bit last weekend at Southfield, MI a few more times than I would have liked.

Ether 04-03-2014 12:28

Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by marccenter (Post 1353304)
The assumption appears reasonable with the shooting range we are seeing on our robot.

I think there might be a misunderstanding. Terminal Velocity is independent of shooting range. It is a function of mg, Cd, rho, and A only.



Ether 04-03-2014 14:00

Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh Meyer (Post 1353241)
How would we measure the terminal velocity?

I don't know for sure; I've never done it. Perhaps drop the ball from a sufficient height next to a marked wall in a tall room and take high speed video with a camera that timestamps the frames. Then tweak the value of Terminal Velocity in this spreadsheet until the model matches your data.

I just posted a small revision (revC) to the air-drag spreadsheet. I turned off the auto-scaling in the graph and re-shaped it so the launch angle "looks" more like the real thing. It may make it easier to visualize what's changing when you change the input parameters. The downside is you lose some resolution.

http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/2946



Ether 17-02-2016 19:15

Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
 

Given launch speed and a desired point (d,h) on the trajectory, show the derivation of and formulas for the launch angles and the equations of the two parabolic (no air drag) solutions.

http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/download/4614



GeeTwo 17-02-2016 23:44

Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh Meyer (Post 1353241)
How would we measure the terminal velocity?

My first thought is a football stadium and a radar or ultrasonic speed gun. The procedure is pretty obvious.

If you don't have a speed gun, a strobe of some sort, including the video method suggested by Ether would be next.

As for 3946, we did the air-resistance-free calculation, added about 50%, tested that we had more than we needed to hit the goal at the ranges we wanted, then we'll back down based on empirical launch data until we hit the goal at the desired range (this year, with our rear bumper in the outer works). Not as elegant as the full-physics solution, but we've built several high-percentage launchers using this paradigm.

Jacob Plicque 11-01-2017 16:06

Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
 
Ether
What coeficient of drag are you using for the ball in the 2014 spreadsheet? In 2017 the ball has a Cd in the 0.6 to 0.8 range by looking at wiffle ball data which varies with the Reyonds number.

Ether 11-01-2017 16:25

Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jacob Plicque (Post 1629477)
Ether
What coeficient of drag are you using for the ball in the 2014 spreadsheet?

The calculation is based on the terminal velocity (Cell A5), and an assumption that air drag varies with the square of velocity.




peronis 13-01-2017 14:49

Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
 
does anyone now the terminal velocity of the fuel?

Jacob Plicque 13-01-2017 16:29

Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
 
The terminal velocity can be calculated from the peak height and the gravity constant.

GeeTwo 13-01-2017 17:23

Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by peronis (Post 1630655)
does anyone now the terminal velocity of the fuel?

Search is your friend.

Ether 13-01-2017 17:43

Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jacob Plicque (Post 1630732)
The terminal velocity can be calculated from the peak height and the gravity constant.

OK, so given g=-9.8 meters/sec2 and peak height = 3 meters, please show us how you would calculate the terminal velocity... without using any other information such as launch speed or launch angle.



Jacob Plicque 14-01-2017 09:57

Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
 
From a known height of 3 meters the calculation follows a freefall model (Vy=0 @t=0) which uses Vy=gt and Y=0.5gt^2.
Thus t=sqrt(3m/9.8m/sec^2/0.5sec)=0.78 seconds.
Vy terminal=0.78sec*9.8m/sec^2=7.66m/sec
The Newtonian trajectory equations do use the initial velocity Voy as follows:
Vy=Voy-gt
Y=Voyt-0.5gt^2 @ Vy=0 the arc is at its peak
X=Voht
Voy=Vo*sin(launch angle from horizon)
Vox=Vo*cos(launch angle)

Ether 14-01-2017 10:34

Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jacob Plicque (Post 1631021)
From a known height of 3 meters the calculation follows a freefall model (Vy=0 @t=0) which uses Vy=gt and Y=0.5gt^2.
Thus t=sqrt(3m/9.8m/sec^2/0.5sec)=0.78 seconds.

You are misunderstanding the meaning of terminal velocity.



Jacob Plicque 14-01-2017 15:51

Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
 
The Newtonian model equations ignore drag which calculates a velocity only on the basis of gravity. My answer is only valid for a drag free Newtonian calculation. Terminal velocity with drag provide an upper velocity limit for a falling object. For a falling baseball it would be about 33m/sec (~108ft/sec) while a hail stone is ~14m/sec (45ft/sec). A 3 meter drop reaches a peak velocity of 7.66m/sec (~26ft/sec) which is less than the maximum terminal velocity. of either of the above examples.

Ether 14-01-2017 16:02

Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jacob Plicque (Post 1631185)
The Newtonian model equations ignore drag which calculates a velocity only on the basis of gravity. My answer is only valid for a drag free Newtonian calculation. Terminal velocity with drag provide an upper velocity limit for a falling object. For a falling baseball it would be about 33m/sec (~108ft/sec) while a hail stone is ~14m/sec (45ft/sec). A 3 meter drop reaches a peak velocity of 7.66m/sec (~26ft/sec) which is less than the maximum terminal velocity. of either of the above examples.

The definition of terminal velocity in the context of this thread is given in the first paragraph of this web page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminal_velocity

Please read it.

You are using a different definition.




Ether 17-01-2017 19:13

Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jacob Plicque (Post 1631185)
The Newtonian model equations ignore drag which calculates a velocity only on the basis of gravity.

Models with air drag are "Newtonian" too. The acceleration is still equal to the net force divided by the mass (Newton's 2nd law).

Perhaps what you meant is constant acceleration model equations ignore air drag.



Ether 19-01-2017 21:45

Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ether (Post 1350693)
Thread created automatically to discuss a document in CD-Media.

Parabolic Trajectory Calculations by Ether



I've recently received a couple of PMs asking about the formulas in the spreadsheet. I'm going to post summaries of the answers here so interested students may benefit:

Some cells are hidden to make the user interface cleaner. To make those cells visible: Unhide columns GHIJK, move the graph out of the way, and highlight the whole spreadsheet.

The air drag acceleration vector D always points 180 degrees opposite to the Velocity vector V.

The magnitude of D is modeled as:

(V2/Vt2)*g

... where Vt is the magnitude of the terminal velocity.


The magnitude of the X component of D is

(V2/Vt2)*g*cos(θ)

= (V2/Vt2)*g*(Vx/V)

= (V*Vx/Vt2)*g


The magnitude of the Y component of D is

(V*Vy/Vt2)*g




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:48.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi