![]() |
paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
Thread created automatically to discuss a document in CD-Media.
Parabolic Trajectory Calculations by Ether |
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
For those of you who downloaded the Parabolic vs Air Drag Trajectory spreadsheet, please note that I just uploaded revB to correct a small error. The user input "launch height" was not being imported into the parabola equation. |
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
Quote:
The parabola plot with the original version was correct as long as you didn't change the launch height. |
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
Ether,
Would you more clearly define the launch angle? A drawing would be nice. Is that from the horizon, or a plumb line? Thanks. -Hugh |
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
Quote:
The reason you don't see the graph appear to visually correspond to the launch angle is because the X and Y axes are not scaled equally, and when you change the launch angle the scaling auto-adjusts to fit the graph. While you're here, does your team happen to have any test data to confirm (or refute) the 37 ft/sec terminal velocity number for this year's game piece? |
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
Thank you.
We do not have any data, but we have been talking about it. How would we measure the terminal velocity? -Hugh |
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
Ether,
The assumption appears reasonable with the shooting range we are seeing on our robot. I just found the thread today. When we unbag the robot on Saturday, I will be attempting to increase our shooting percentage via angle and may be able to provide some data after that point. We did overshoot the target a bit last weekend at Southfield, MI a few more times than I would have liked. |
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
Quote:
|
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
Quote:
I just posted a small revision (revC) to the air-drag spreadsheet. I turned off the auto-scaling in the graph and re-shaped it so the launch angle "looks" more like the real thing. It may make it easier to visualize what's changing when you change the input parameters. The downside is you lose some resolution. http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/2946 |
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
Given launch speed and a desired point (d,h) on the trajectory, show the derivation of and formulas for the launch angles and the equations of the two parabolic (no air drag) solutions. http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/download/4614 |
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
Quote:
If you don't have a speed gun, a strobe of some sort, including the video method suggested by Ether would be next. As for 3946, we did the air-resistance-free calculation, added about 50%, tested that we had more than we needed to hit the goal at the ranges we wanted, then we'll back down based on empirical launch data until we hit the goal at the desired range (this year, with our rear bumper in the outer works). Not as elegant as the full-physics solution, but we've built several high-percentage launchers using this paradigm. |
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
Ether
What coeficient of drag are you using for the ball in the 2014 spreadsheet? In 2017 the ball has a Cd in the 0.6 to 0.8 range by looking at wiffle ball data which varies with the Reyonds number. |
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
Quote:
|
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
does anyone now the terminal velocity of the fuel?
|
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
The terminal velocity can be calculated from the peak height and the gravity constant.
|
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
Quote:
|
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
Quote:
|
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
From a known height of 3 meters the calculation follows a freefall model (Vy=0 @t=0) which uses Vy=gt and Y=0.5gt^2.
Thus t=sqrt(3m/9.8m/sec^2/0.5sec)=0.78 seconds. Vy terminal=0.78sec*9.8m/sec^2=7.66m/sec The Newtonian trajectory equations do use the initial velocity Voy as follows: Vy=Voy-gt Y=Voyt-0.5gt^2 @ Vy=0 the arc is at its peak X=Voht Voy=Vo*sin(launch angle from horizon) Vox=Vo*cos(launch angle) |
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
Quote:
|
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
The Newtonian model equations ignore drag which calculates a velocity only on the basis of gravity. My answer is only valid for a drag free Newtonian calculation. Terminal velocity with drag provide an upper velocity limit for a falling object. For a falling baseball it would be about 33m/sec (~108ft/sec) while a hail stone is ~14m/sec (45ft/sec). A 3 meter drop reaches a peak velocity of 7.66m/sec (~26ft/sec) which is less than the maximum terminal velocity. of either of the above examples.
|
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
Quote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminal_velocity Please read it. You are using a different definition. |
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
Quote:
Perhaps what you meant is constant acceleration model equations ignore air drag. |
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
Quote:
I've recently received a couple of PMs asking about the formulas in the spreadsheet. I'm going to post summaries of the answers here so interested students may benefit: Some cells are hidden to make the user interface cleaner. To make those cells visible: Unhide columns GHIJK, move the graph out of the way, and highlight the whole spreadsheet. The air drag acceleration vector D always points 180 degrees opposite to the Velocity vector V. The magnitude of D is modeled as: (V2/Vt2)*g ... where Vt is the magnitude of the terminal velocity. The magnitude of the X component of D is (V2/Vt2)*g*cos(θ) = (V2/Vt2)*g*(Vx/V) = (V*Vx/Vt2)*g The magnitude of the Y component of D is (V*Vy/Vt2)*g |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:48. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi