![]() |
Re: Were to store practice bot at regional?
Quote:
But for the sake of argument let's use your interpretation - you must define this set of items once and it will remain that way. What if you bring in zero pounds of items and then define the set once you go to your trailer / shop / whatever in one fell swoop? |
Re: Were to store practice bot at regional?
Quote:
|
Re: Were to store practice bot at regional?
I have two words to add. Always remember "gracious professionalism" whether in FRC or wherever it carries over into the real world.
|
Re: Were to store practice bot at regional?
Quote:
I'm saying that you will be under the honor system that you've pre-selected your 45lbs of withholding and won't go to your shop to take advantage of resources and spare parts that other teams don't have access to. |
Re: Were to store practice bot at regional?
Quote:
|
Re: Were to store practice bot at regional?
This rule applies to manufactured parts. There is no limit on COTS items.
|
Re: Were to store practice bot at regional?
It all just seems a little bit silly. We have a 6 week build season because FIRST "likes us", but we have to build an entire second robot to have adequate practice time, and then to actually bring spares or upgrades to an event we need to fabricate another 1/3 of our robot or disassemble and reassemble our robot after every event?
Quote:
|
Re: Were to store practice bot at regional?
Quote:
The 45lbs of witholding allowance isn't allowing you to use up to 45lbs of any pre-fab stuff, it's that you can bring up to 45 of pre-fab stuff. So, conceivably, you have to plan that allowance out Bringing a practice robot and stripping any <45lbs of stuff off it isn't the same as having to have brought <45lbs of stuff with you from the start. This is the core difference of interpretation that most people are having here. I think that FIRST intends for us to have pre-selected that 45lbs of stuff, but Q&A is the only way to clarify this. Again, everyone is under the honor system in this rule, especially teams based at (or near) event venues. |
Re: Were to store practice bot at regional?
Quote:
Quote:
Yeah, it is a whole lot of work. |
Re: Were to store practice bot at regional?
Quote:
Adam, feel free to correct my interpretation... |
Re: Were to store practice bot at regional?
Quote:
At what point do you say a team doesn't have potential access? Quote:
|
Re: Were to store practice bot at regional?
Quote:
|
Re: Were to store practice bot at regional?
Quote:
|
Re: Were to store practice bot at regional?
Quote:
Spare parts (including fabricated identicals) STILL count against your 45 pound allowance. If you have two robot arms that are identical, one of which is on the bagged robot and another you bring in, the arm you brought in counts against your 45 pounds. If you bring in (or have access to out in your trailer) more than 45 pounds of spare parts (not including things like COTS, raw materials, etc.), you are absolutely in violation of the witholding allowance. Otherwise, there would be no reason to have the witholding allowance rule in the first place. You don't get to have a whole practice robot in your trailer to farm parts from. You have brought ~120 pounds to the event. Even if you only select 45 pounds from it. You still brought your whole practice robot to the competition. You are in violation. Pick the parts that are most likely to break and bring spares of those. Yes, I know many teams violate the rules. So stop it. |
Re: Were to store practice bot at regional?
The easy answer to the problem of having a venue close to or in your fabrication shop: don't use it. Bag and tag and withholding allowance are, until it becomes necessary to have an intervention, on the honor system. Our main venue is less than 2 miles away from our school. If we forgot a tool, we will drive back and get it (and we'll do the same for other teams that don't have this advantage). There is a hardware store nearby; if we need some screws, we'll go get them. But we won't go back to the shop and pull non-COTS parts out as necessary. I recommend everyone take this approach.
"Judging" and "spirit" are loaded words on CD. Usually, when "spirit" is invoked (and when people are criticized for invoking it), we are debating things like inspiration and mentor involvement. This is categorically different: it is the implication and application of a rule that has existed in some variant for many years, and which was reiterated for this year's competition. As such, pointing out that violating a rule is not the way FRC should be played is not the same as criticizing a team for having a culture that falls within the rainbow of styles that teams have. And in this case, "judging" is not the personal feelings of me or anyone else on CD; it is the ruling of the GDC and the actual judges who, if they knew teams were allowing themselves free access to any part they wanted, would certainly "judge". |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 21:56. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi