![]() |
Re: Consistent shooter
Our robot doesn't fit any of the shooter catagories... We are very consistent in the high goal (when our pit checks are done right).
|
Re: Consistent shooter
Quote:
|
Re: Consistent shooter
Quote:
|
Re: Consistent shooter
Quote:
See you guys tomorrow! #repeat? |
Re: Consistent shooter
At the LA Regional, our pneumatic catapult shooter had a 100% scoring percentage in both autonomous and teleop from our 2nd through 10th qual round and had 1 miss in elims amongst heavy defense (scored 6 in elims QF).
Note in the first round we missed shots due to a pneumatics leak which was fixed shortly after. I was impressed with how consistent our shooter ended up performing. We shoot between 6-8 feet away when stopped, and 8-10 feet while in motion (we use sensors, indicator LED lights, and telemetry to determine shot attempt distance) |
Re: Consistent shooter
Quote:
|
Re: Consistent shooter
Quote:
|
Re: Consistent shooter
Quote:
Basically it could probably shoot from one field to another at championships. Legitimately. |
Re: Consistent shooter
Quote:
And #Repeat is possible. |
Re: Consistent shooter
Quote:
|
Re: Consistent shooter
Right with ironicdeadbird on this one. The under inflated one was VERY underinflated, and was actually a yoga ball from Target inside the official cover. sitting on it compressed it to 1/2 diameter. Shots were about 1/2 normal distance. We've been practicing lately with an overinflated ball similar to what we found on the field in Utah so that our shooter would be set up to handle it.
|
Re: Consistent shooter
Quote:
If so, does anyone have any test results with an "official" "regulation" ball that is somewhat (but not "very") underinflated? |
Re: Consistent shooter
Ironicdeadbird is one of the mentors on my team, and we're talking about the same ball. A little more background:
Prior to Utah, we practiced with a ball that we deemed properly inflated. In Utah, the balls were slightly more inflated than we assumed they would be, and they became tighter as the event went on, so they seemed "overinflated" to me. Since returning, we've inflated our ball more to simulate field conditions. Yesterday we played with two balls that were not ours: one was very slightly under what we had been using prior to Utah, the other was the aforementioned yoga ball. We shot from specific points on the field yesterday that we had previously tested. The distances were similar for the ball with "normal" inflation and very short with the other ball. Consistency is very hard to measure with our design, however, as ball shape, location in the shooter, and battery charge all effect it as well. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 15:42. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi