Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Use of radios for communication (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=127877)

themick07 15-03-2014 11:01

Use of radios for communication
 
Are we allowed to use radios for communication from the pit to the stands?

engunneer 15-03-2014 11:06

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
They have been banned in the past, but I don't see a specific rule this year. Why not cell phones?

themick07 15-03-2014 11:07

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by engunneer (Post 1359171)
They have been banned in the past, but I don't see a specific rule this year. Why not cell phones?

Terrible signal. We are in The Wolstein Center in Cleveland. A college basketball court.

ayeckley 15-03-2014 12:17

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by themick07 (Post 1359172)
A college Faraday cage.

Fixed that for you.

Al Skierkiewicz 15-03-2014 12:47

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
Check in the "At the Event" rules.

4.15 SITE RESTRICTIONS
Please read the following common site restrictions and adhere to them in order to promote an orderly, safe, pleasant
and exciting competition. Please refer to Administrative Manual - Section 4.2 FIRST Safety for additional site
restrictions at your event.


Do not use walkie-talkies.

Just adding to the following post.

Chris_Ely 15-03-2014 12:57

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
From the Admin. manual:
Quote:

Originally Posted by Admin. Manual 4.15
Do not use walkie-talkies.


goofy173 19-03-2014 15:01

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
So cell phones with push-to-talk would be exactly the same as a walkie talkie and therefore banned. How would they know?

Joe Ross 19-03-2014 15:33

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by goofy173 (Post 1361390)
So cell phones with push-to-talk would be exactly the same as a walkie talkie and therefore banned. How would they know?

I suspect that the rule isn't intended to ban the function of the walkie-talkie, but rather the implementation. FIRST uses multiple sets of radios for communication between volunteers, which I suspect they do not want to be interfered with. Cell phone push-to-talk does not operate in the personal radio frequency range.

Tungrus 19-03-2014 15:36

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
Hotspots using cell phones and similar technology creates interference too! PLEASE PLEASE do not mess our robots! Get pigeons if you can but no walkie-talkie!

fb39ca4 19-03-2014 15:45

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
Doesn't say anything about ham radios. I don't see what the issue would be about interference, as those and walkie-talkies do not operate on the same bands as wifi.

Libby K 19-03-2014 18:39

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by fb39ca4 (Post 1361417)
Doesn't say anything about ham radios. I don't see what the issue would be about interference, as those and walkie-talkies do not operate on the same bands as wifi.

Event managers and key volunteers use radios to communicate across the competition venues.

As has been said already, it's in the manual not to use them. So don't.

Al Skierkiewicz 23-03-2014 13:28

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
While it would seem that this is an RF interference issue, that is not all. It is part of the "leveling the playing field" issue. Any item that could give a team an advantage over other teams that is not specifically allowed in the rules, is likewise banned. That is why you can't use a bigger battery or motors not listed.
And by the way, you don't have to be on the same frequency to produce interference. Ask me about this sometime. It is a very complex subject.

JCharlton 23-03-2014 14:54

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tungrus (Post 1361415)
Hotspots using cell phones and similar technology creates interference too! PLEASE PLEASE do not mess our robots! Get pigeons if you can but no walkie-talkie!

I think pigeons might mess with the robots too.

RallyJeff 23-03-2014 15:22

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by fb39ca4 (Post 1361417)
Doesn't say anything about ham radios. I don't see what the issue would be about interference, as those and walkie-talkies do not operate on the same bands as wifi.

There are walkie-talkie style ham radios, which is what anyone at an FRC event would probably be using - I hope nobody's considering setting up a base station in their pit.

Depending on the power output of a ham radio, its distance from other devices, and the extent of the RF shielding/protection in those devices, a ham radio can most certainly cause interference in other devices on different bands... and even on sensitive electronics generally.

Koko Ed 23-03-2014 15:28

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
Teams aren't supposed to use them but I have seen quite a few teams with them. So who do we report this to?

donkehote 23-03-2014 16:17

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Skierkiewicz (Post 1363049)
It is part of the "leveling the playing field" issue. Any item that could give a team an advantage over other teams that is not specifically allowed in the rules, is likewise banned.


I dont want to derail the thread but,

Since practice bots provide a significant, undeniable advantage, shouldn't they be banned by the same logic, as part of "Leveling the playing field"?

-Puts on suit of armor and runs away- :D

Edit- To clarify, I mean practice bots overall, not bringing them to competition, Im fully aware the are illegal in the pits.

EricH 23-03-2014 19:43

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Koko Ed (Post 1363117)
Teams aren't supposed to use them but I have seen quite a few teams with them. So who do we report this to?

Regional Director or FTA would work. They then get the "fun" of telling the team to put the radios away.

pyroslev 23-03-2014 20:28

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
If you want to still use PTT method, Voxer is a good app. Uses Data on your cellphone. I use it when I wanna have a short conversation beyond texting but without calling. There is also bluetooth integration as well.

Warnings:

Careful about when you use it. If you are using it for stand to field comms in alliance selection, possibly legal. During match play at a off-season event, one team communicating from stands to field non-electronically was given a yellow card. So be smart on that front. Read the manual and ask the staff at your event before you use it. When it comes to bluetooth earsets, I encourage teams to take them out if they're on the field.

The app can eat battery power. Between that and my FRC Spyder App, my battery hated me by noon. Also the default ringtone is extremely quiet. That makes it hard to hear.

Yervor 23-03-2014 21:06

GroupMe is also a very good app for getting quick info and requests in between stands and pit, especially if whoever you want to contact doesn't immediately have their phone out - someone always does and is able to relay the information. It isn't voice, though, only text, but proved very useful this season nonetheless.

kmusa 23-03-2014 21:59

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by themick07 (Post 1359172)
Terrible signal. We are in The Wolstein Center in Cleveland. ...

Unfortunately, this is SO true.

Alan Anderson 23-03-2014 22:06

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by donkehote (Post 1363140)
Since practice bots provide a significant, undeniable advantage, shouldn't they be banned by the same logic, as part of "Leveling the playing field"?

It is illegal to bring a practice robot to a regional competition.

Lucario 26-03-2014 23:01

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RallyJeff (Post 1363114)
There are walkie-talkie style ham radios, which is what anyone at an FRC event would probably be using - I hope nobody's considering setting up a base station in their pit.

Depending on the power output of a ham radio, its distance from other devices, and the extent of the RF shielding/protection in those devices, a ham radio can most certainly cause interference in other devices on different bands... and even on sensitive electronics generally.

Let's take advantage of this phenomenon!
Mic->Rasberry Pi->Pirate Radio on a US FM band (Repeat for each person)

People only need an FM radio to tune in- Outreach! Just leave a station near the doors outside and set the RasPi FM band to NPR or something- nothing can go wrong!

(Bonus: I'm pretty sure it even violates FCC rules, so you can can get the opportunity to enlighten lots of important people about FIRST)

BBray_T1296 26-03-2014 23:40

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
On the topic of pigeons, I have yet to find any rule banning them from use on a FRC robot.

I am still waiting for this concept to be transferred to robots. A pigeon can identify a red ball, right? that is all you need (well, a blue ball pecking pigeon as well)

Libby K 27-03-2014 08:57

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Koko Ed (Post 1363117)
Teams aren't supposed to use them but I have seen quite a few teams with them. So who do we report this to?

If you see a team using radios to communicate, go to the Regional Director or Event Coordinator (In Districts, there is no RD to speak of, but there are local event leads). It is (as has been outlined already) against the "At the Event" rules (Section 4 of the manual) and it's on the event to speak to the team and inform them of said rule violation.

BigJ 27-03-2014 09:39

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BBray_T1296 (Post 1365451)
On the topic of pigeons, I have yet to find any rule banning them from use on a FRC robot.

I am still waiting for this concept to be transferred to robots. A pigeon can identify a red ball, right? that is all you need (well, a blue ball pecking pigeon as well)

R34 disallows pigeons on the ROBOT, as it a non-electrical source of energy that is not one of the 3 allowed (compressed air, change in CoG, deformation of robot parts).

cgmv123 27-03-2014 09:47

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BigJ (Post 1365550)
R34 disallows pigeons on the ROBOT, as it a non-electrical source of energy that is not one of the 3 allowed (compressed air, change in CoG, deformation of robot parts).

Also, I'd like to (and I think Big Al would like to as well) meet an inspector who thinks a pigeon is safe under R8.

Al Skierkiewicz 30-03-2014 22:41

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
I was thinking it was more likely to come under the "contaminating the field" rules. In Chicago there is a local ordinace to prevent feeding the pigeons.

Solidstate89 31-03-2014 12:31

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tungrus (Post 1361415)
Hotspots using cell phones and similar technology creates interference too! PLEASE PLEASE do not mess our robots! Get pigeons if you can but no walkie-talkie!

They don't operate on even remotely the same frequency. There would be little to no interference between the WiFi that the robots use (I believe they operate on the 5Ghz channel) and the frequency that any cell phone would use over its cellular connection that can range anywhere from 700-800Mhz, to as high as 1700Mhz or even 2100Mhz - all depending on your carrier.

This if of course, assuming proper shielding was used in the cell phones and hotspots to reduce RF leakage.

Al Skierkiewicz 31-03-2014 12:56

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Solidstate89 (Post 1367187)
They don't operate on even remotely the same frequency. There would be little to no interference between the WiFi that the robots use (I believe they operate on the 5Ghz channel) and the frequency that any cell phone would use over its cellular connection that can range anywhere from 700-800Mhz, to as high as 1700Mhz or even 2100Mhz - all depending on your carrier.

This if of course, assuming proper shielding was used in the cell phones and hotspots to reduce RF leakage.

Sorry, Solid, That is not the way interference works. The third harmonic of 1700 MHz is right in the band. All it needs is a non-linear mixer and voila, interference. Loose aluminum hardware makes a great non-linear mixer. High power RF mixing in the input to a receiver can also produce the same effect. 800 + 2*2100 also comes out on a frequency that can interfere.

Solidstate89 31-03-2014 14:29

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Skierkiewicz (Post 1367201)
Sorry, Solid, That is not the way interference works. The third harmonic of 1700 MHz is right in the band. All it needs is a non-linear mixer and voila, interference. Loose aluminum hardware makes a great non-linear mixer. High power RF mixing in the input to a receiver can also produce the same effect. 800 + 2*2100 also comes out on a frequency that can interfere.

*nods*

Good to know.

DanielPlotas 31-03-2014 14:40

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BigJ (Post 1365550)
R34 disallows pigeons on the ROBOT, as it a non-electrical source of energy that is not one of the 3 allowed (compressed air, change in CoG, deformation of robot parts).

but you can have an additional power source if it is a component of something (like a laptop), and since the pigeons energy is stored inside it, it would be legal.

FrankJ 31-03-2014 14:45

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DanielPlotas (Post 1367262)
but you can have an additional power source if it is a component of something (like a laptop), and since the pigeons energy is stored inside it, it would be legal.

You do know the rule about disabling wireless communications on the laptop? Most pigeons perform better wireless.

ayeckley 31-03-2014 17:08

Re: Use of radios for communication
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DanielPlotas (Post 1367262)
but you can have an additional power source if it is a component of something (like a laptop), and since the pigeons energy is stored inside it, it would be legal.

This introduces a whole new set of questions that aren't addressed in the Game Manual: Doesn't this require that all pigeons "arrive having eaten"? How will inspectors be verifying this condition, as most pigeons won't give you an honest answer even when asked a direct question. Is it considered an unfair advantage to keep pigeons in the team trailer, or must they be included in the 45lb withholding allowance and brought in at the start of the event (they are for all intents and purposes a COTS item after all). I'm pretty sure a modified pigeon would be considered a safety hazard in the same sense that pneumatic components cannot be modified (but obviously we'd need an official Q&A ruling to be certain). If a team bagged their pigeon(s), can they then be fed once the inspector signs off on their lock up form? And on a related thought, how are non-functional pigeons to be disposed of safely at the event?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:50.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi