![]() |
Week 3 analysis
For thouse who competeted or watched week 3 regionals what did you see/learn?
For us we learned that if you could grab the ball and hold on it to it to the point where it won't come out you would fairly well. Also a simple robot that could pass and defend was super great. Also defending 2 robots at once from getting the ball was something that became a super helpful skill. |
Re: Week 3 analysis
yes, we attended a week three event WPI and did extremely well because of the defense, when not controlling a ball we would completely shut down the opposing alliance from scoring, and we established our catapult so that we can shoot while getting defended worked real great
|
Re: Week 3 analysis
Pedestal delays were still occurring this week at St. Louis. We had one match where it never lit up after a cycle completed, after about 10 seconds of yelling about it we finally just grabbed it and threw it on the field anyway. Other times delays were around 5 seconds. Have that happen a few times in a match and it adds up.
|
Re: Week 3 analysis
The 1 point goal is real.
|
Re: Week 3 analysis
Quote:
Two of the best shooters at the New York Tech Valley Regional, 20 and 1126 paired up for eliminations. Until finals, the alliance scored a total of 1 high goal during teleop. #Lowgoalisbestgoal |
Re: Week 3 analysis
|
Re: Week 3 analysis
It is the foul points that win/lose many of the games. Also, the refs/volunteers seem to take their sweet time lighting up the pedestals and getting the balls back in play once ejected from the field.
|
Re: Week 3 analysis
Quote:
|
Re: Week 3 analysis
Quote:
|
Re: Week 3 analysis
Teams still hold on to the ball for to long thus slowing cycles down. Do anything with the ball other then hold on to it. Spit it out, throw it in the air, anything except keep it from your team.
And some teams still cant get over the "sex appeal" of throwing a ball high instead of dumping in low goal for fast cycle. Human players also need to be running the ball back to start cycles I saw many that walked the ball over to a waiting robot. |
Re: Week 3 analysis
It's funny when the human players aren't paying attention and you yell at them by saying "HUMAN!!!". I've never referred to someone that way but it makes sense now.
|
Re: Week 3 analysis
Quote:
It's also worth noting though that most of these errors were just during practice matches on the first day, and when such errors did determine the outcome of a qualification or elimination match, the refs did the right thing and decided that a replay was in order. |
Re: Week 3 analysis
Going into our first district event this past weekend, I was surprised at how few G40 fouls were called given all the controversy surrounding that particular rule. The refs at Mt. Vernon were focused on robot-robot interaction...perhaps a bit too much (I saw a few instances of what I thought were clear G40 violations that were not called because the refs were not watching), though I can't say I disapprove, as at no point did it seem to be a safety issue.
I guess the main takeaway is that refs still have too much to watch for given the game-changing nature of technical fouls. |
Re: Week 3 analysis
Quote:
|
Re: Week 3 analysis
Quote:
Refs were very inconsistent with replaying matches when cycles took abnormally long to start. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 21:16. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi