![]() |
Week4 Twitter data analyses
This thread is for discussion of Week4 Twitter data analyses posted here: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/2985 I will be adding additional analyses as time permits. Special requests will be considered also. |
Re: Week4 Twitter data analyses
Let me start by saying thanks for all that you do for this community...I have grown tremendously over the last several years reading your posts.
What is uCCWM? CCWM without foul points? |
Re: Week4 Twitter data analyses
I really like EPA. Certainly more useful for cross event comparisons than raw OPR/CCWM. Wish we could tie in average event score or something of the like to EPA. Being able to view OPR separate from fouls and EPA certainly helps remove outliers from the data.
Thanks for the data as usual. :) |
Re: Week4 Twitter data analyses
Quote:
Code:
Code:
|
Re: Week4 Twitter data analyses
Quote:
Look for Average Alliance Scores at each Event near the bottom of the list of attachments: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/2985 Not sure what the best way would be to integrate these with EPA. |
Re: Week4 Twitter data analyses
I'd like to get some feedback on which of the attachments you'd like to see again for Week5. I need to pare it back a bit. http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/2985 |
Re: Week4 Twitter data analyses
Posting here because it's a very similar subject.. On request of some twitter people, I used the @frcfms data to determine the % of matches determined by fouls (any change in result, including from or to ties) over the past three years, broken down into years and categories such as quals, semifinals, or 3rd match of an elimination series. Those statistics are available here: http://goo.gl/mKuTXS.
|
Re: Week4 Twitter data analyses
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Week4 Twitter data analyses
Quote:
|
Re: Week4 Twitter data analyses
Quote:
EDIT: It doesn't seem like assist points are part of the FMS feed. Is there another resource out there I could mine for analysis? |
Re: Week4 Twitter data analyses
Quote:
|
Re: Week4 Twitter data analyses
Twitter data1 has final score, foul points awarded, autonomous, and "TeleOp"2 for each match Match Results has final score for each match Team Standings has Assist, autonomous, Truss&Catch, and "TeleOp"3 for each Team (total of all alliance scores for alliances on which the team played). 1The usual Twitter data caveats apply. 2Twitter "TeleOp" is equal to Assist + T&C + Goals 3 Team Standings "TeleOp" is equal to Goals + Fouls |
Re: Week4 Twitter data analyses
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
My null hypothesis was that each match had the same proportion of matches decided by fouls. With the percentage of matches that are decided by fouls being 23.34%, my x^2 value ended up being 46.4. I came up with a p-value of 5.06945E-07. So clearly, weeks and match type produce different numbers of matches decided by fouls. Code:
MDBF Played Expected Difference X^2 Std. Resid. |
Re: Week4 Twitter data analyses
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Week4 Twitter data analyses
Quote:
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...58&postcount=4 http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...61#post1144161 http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...1&postcount=15 http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...4&postcount=20 http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...6&postcount=17 http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...65&postcount=3 http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...81&postcount=9 |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 18:31. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi