![]() |
Re: 2014 MN State Championship
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: 2014 MN State Championship
I've entered data into the scouting database for teams who had no information. I put question marks by any of the data I wasn't absolutely sure of. There is still missing data and my school blocks TBA so I can't do any more research right now.
|
Re: 2014 MN State Championship
Quote:
|
Re: 2014 MN State Championship
Quote:
|
Re: 2014 MN State Championship
Quote:
|
Re: 2014 MN State Championship
One of 4607's major concerns after last year's season was to make the next big leap and not just rest on the idea that we were 'just a second year team'.
The overwhelming response from the kids was that we needed to build a practice bot. It proved be very intensive and costly, but it really did push our team's talents and skills to the next level. We had some issues right off at North Star (See the first few matches, but once we got the Superstructure correctly mounted on 'Gumdrop' (our competition Robot), we did pretty well. No doubt that we will continue building practice bots in the upcoming years. Quote:
|
Re: 2014 MN State Championship
I am not certain how 'limiting' the MSHSL has been with FIRST - at Becker we structured our team just as any other Athletic/Activity team would do.
However, BHS does not fund any part of 4607 CIS - we have to cover all of our expenses ourselves. The kids fundraise the crap out of the off-season and we knock on a lot of doors. I agree with C&Cookies - MSHSL Tournament brought legitimacy to the sport. I remember leaving the Marriucci to go get some lunch and I found myself behind a kid form M&SA with a letter jacket on - and the patch on the back was "2013 State Champion -FIRST Robotics". I thought that was pretty cool. Quote:
|
Re: 2014 MN State Championship
In case anyone is still trying to figure out which MN teams build practice bots I just remembered that 2491, 3018 and 2502 all do.
That brings the count to 8 I believe, putting it above the total number of teams in Iowa. |
Re: 2014 MN State Championship
Yep, 2502 has built a practice bot for the last few years, and it is so, so nice to have. We have made a ton of modifications and improvements over our original design, and without a practice robot we would have gone into competition without any of those things tested.
If there are any teams out there who want to be more competitive in competition, you gotta find the time and money to build a practice bot. Just today we made a modification to our shooter to lower the shot angle and increase our shooting range from about 2 feet to 10 feet! No joke, the simple addition of a few pegs at the back of our shooter made all the difference and now we're just a little disappointed we didn't think of it earlier. Expect high goals for days at state! Plus building a practice robot is great for us because we have a pretty large team. It helps keep everyone busy thought the season with construction, testing, and mods. In short. BUILD A PRACTICE ROBOT NEXT YEAR! |
Re: 2014 MN State Championship
2470 built a practice chassis this year. After bagging we used the practice chassis for sizing of new parts and creation of bumper mounts. Next year we will be building a full practice robot.
|
Re: 2014 MN State Championship
At the start of the build season 3883 had plans to make a second practice bot but never got around to actually doing it. Mainly becuae of the new kit chassis this year. The team still managed to build a great robot. Yes practice bots are very useful but does not mean teams cant build robots that work well.
Anyways back to the topic of state. With the 6 hour unbag period the team within 2.5 hours had a double ball auto working. Its really tight on time but is under 10 seconds. The Data Bits now have a 2 ball auto for state and wont be afraid to use it (hopefully). Here is the video of the testing. The first ball is 2 bag and tag bags stuffed inside. Had no second ball and it was more about picking up the second ball and getting that one shot. Hope to show it off at state. 2 ball auto working |
Re: 2014 MN State Championship
Quote:
We also increased our sweet spot quite a bit with a nice flat trajectory |
Re: 2014 MN State Championship
Looks like some great improvements have been done on machines for the weekend. We have made some upgrades as well. At Lake Superior we had issues with the ball popping off our bot when hit from the front. That is fixed and the ball DOESNT come out now. Also the ball jostled around during auto because it was not secure. The fix solved this too.
We had robot displays for our sponsors and during this time realized our front bar on our chassis was cracked so we had to replace that too. Finally our wings were too "floppy" and did not allow for easy and quick opening and closing because we used a window motor to open and close them. Now we replaced this with pneumatic cylinders and it opens and closes in a snap. All this plus changing tread on wheels and replacing broken bumper boards and we are now ready! Should be a great time and we are looking forward to a fast paced weekend. Good luck to all! |
Re: 2014 MN State Championship
Now that we are within a week of the competition does anybody have some bold predictions they want to share?
Here are mine: - There will be >0 matches over 300 points - The innovative strategies used in elims at Champs will be common throughout the tournament - There will be few if any 2 assist cycle strategies going into a match - The winning alliance will be the smarter alliance rather than the alliance with the best robots - Fouls will not play a major role - (Shot in the dark) 2052 will seed first and select 2175 as their first pick. |
Re: 2014 MN State Championship
My bold predictions are as follows:
-There will be a mainly strategies involving HP in assists -Finals matches will have score differences under 20 -Our driver won't be in a wheelchair (otherwise we'll need a booster seat) -Free corndogs??? Free ice cream??? Free chipotle??? We just don't know. -Robots will fall over. A lot. (SATURDAY SATURdAY SATURDAY ROBO CARNAGE AT WILLIAMS ARENA BE THERE BE THERE BE THERE) Also, does anyone know if any teams declined? Rumour has it a few did. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:32. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi