Re: Galileo 2014
 

The following Teams have no data or partial data on the Galileo Pre-Event Scouting Google Doc: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...3h4d EE#gid=0

• 228
• 337
• 488 (3 Ball Auto but nothing else?)
• 714
• 766
• 869
• 884
• 1011
• 1266
• 1515
• 1756
• 1775
• 1885
• 2135
• 2177
• 2424
• 2642
• 2665
• 2974
• 2980
• 3103
• 3138
• 3191
• 3309
• 3480
• 4060
• 4176
• 4288
• 4719
• 4940
• 4965
• 4979
• 4985
• 5098
• 5137
• 5145
• 5320

The hope is by putting their number here, they might update the document. Please refer to the Key/Glossary Tab for any clarification.

Thanks,
-Clinton-

Re: Galileo 2014
 

Team 4536 is super excited to be in Galileo. The kids are excited to see all of the amazing robots up close. It will be particularly interesting to see 148, since 148's reveal video was the first that many of the kids saw. Also looking forward to the chance to play with the other MN teams 2052 and 2177.

One of my first thoughts upon looking at the attending teams list was, "awesome, we're right next to 4488!"

Out of curiosity, are we the only double-sided intake robot? I checked as many teams as I could, and I didn't see any others.

Re: Galileo 2014
 

Updated for Team 5012.

Galileo looks fun. Glad to be playing on the same field as friends on 2122, 973, and others!

Re: Galileo 2014
 

Our entire team is incredibly excited to be on Galileo with you all.

@ Inkling, 488 from PNW is also a double-sided intake robot. I'm sure our teams will get to know each other very well in our few days there :)

Re: Galileo 2014
 

Cool! I also noticed that 1756 has a double-sided intake, so we are not alone like I had originally thought.

Re: Galileo 2014
 

Team 4256 is excited! if there is an scouting or strategy in the works for our division we would like to contribute.

Re: Galileo 2014
 

I just updated our entry. I switched us from 3 ball to 2 ball auto because we haven't ever bothered to use the 3 ball auto in competition. Think of it like the secret menu at In and Out; it exists, but you'll have to ask nicely for us to try it. It's just not fast enough to warrant use at higher levels of play.

There's some chance our robot will be geared to go faster at CMP than it's been all season. We're playing with that change this weekend.

Re: Galileo 2014
 

I Would love to hear the Galileo Division singing this at some point.

Re: Galileo 2014
 

Preliminary match schedule is out. If it sticks, I like it alot. Plus if it sticks we are first match both Friday and Saturday. That would be fun.

Re: Galileo 2014
 

Click here for the Preliminary schedule, mentioned above. (Here's a link to Frank's blog post.)

Re: Galileo 2014
 

Predicted rankings based on max OPR:

Assist, Teleop, etc. points calculated by summing the assist, teleop, etc. OPRs of the 3 robots they play with for each match they play in.

The sub-OPRs for each team is from the regional the team scored their highest overall OPR at.

Re: Galileo 2014
 

Thanks for posting that Michael. Do you have postable data on each predicted match?

EDIT: Nevermind, just found your paper.

Re: Galileo 2014
 

I've updated a bit onto 4719's bot. There's a few unsure bits because of a massive clutch overhaul we did after our regionals; new parts = new specs.

The irregularities and unreliability of the clutch was one of the only reasons why our OPR is so low; We were out quite a bit trying to fix it. Now that we have newer CNC'd parts, we're praying it works better on the field and our specs change. Practice rounds have shown promise.

Re: Galileo 2014
 

10th best OPR in the division and can only pull a 3-7 curse you scheduling gods.

Re: Galileo 2014
 

The OPR predictor had us going like 5-7 and finishing 33rd in Boston. We went 9-3 and finished third. Take it for what it's worth. In this game OPR is not everything. Three bots, with good strategy, working together, can do what the OPR predictor says they can't.