Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Extra Discussion (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=68)
-   -   pic: Division OPR Comparison (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=128857)

joelg236 16-04-2014 17:50
pic: Division OPR Comparison
 

joelg236 16-04-2014 17:54
Re: pic: Division OPR Comparison
 
Related - the stats used here and a few extra interesting stats.



Stats here.

Jefferson 16-04-2014 18:17
Re: pic: Division OPR Comparison
 
I really like the presentation of the data for comparison here. Thanks for putting it together.
I wonder how it would change using average OPR instead of max. Some teams have a pretty significant variation from regional to regional.

And wow... Curie seems to be STACKED at the top.

Abhishek R 16-04-2014 18:23
Re: pic: Division OPR Comparison
 
This is a great format, really shows a lot of cool relations. Seems like although Curie is stacked up top, it has a weaker middle tier than the other divisions.

joelg236 16-04-2014 18:24
Re: pic: Division OPR Comparison
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson (Post 1374958)
I really like the presentation of the data for comparison here. Thanks for putting it together.
I wonder how it would change using average OPR instead of max. Some teams have a pretty significant variation from regional to regional.

And wow... Curie seems to be STACKED at the top.
We're definitely one of those teams. Unfortunately, it's hard to tell if a team has a lucky showing (good schedule, etc.) or just got a lot better (I think our team did).

I'll try and do the same analysis with average opr when I get home.

Jefferson 16-04-2014 19:32
Re: pic: Division OPR Comparison
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by joelg236 (Post 1374961)
We're definitely one of those teams. Unfortunately, it's hard to tell if a team has a lucky showing (good schedule, etc.) or just got a lot better (I think our team did).

I'll try and do the same analysis with average opr when I get home.
Both metrics definitely have their merits. Teams that improve significantly can get drug down by a regional that's not representative of their abilities.

ks68 16-04-2014 20:44
Re: pic: Division OPR Comparison
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson (Post 1374958)
I really like the presentation of the data for comparison here. Thanks for putting it together.
I wonder how it would change using average OPR instead of max. Some teams have a pretty significant variation from regional to regional.

And wow... Curie seems to be STACKED at the top.
I think 7 out of the top 10 teams are in Curie.

joelg236 16-04-2014 23:25
Re: pic: Division OPR Comparison
 
More charts for you all

CCWM By Division


Top 10 CCWM


Top 25 CCWM


Top 10 OPR


Top 25 OPR

Tim Lehmann4967 17-04-2014 08:26
Re: pic: Division OPR Comparison
 
It really looks as if they're attempting to end the Curie Curse! It is a shame Galileo is lacking a bit, but it'll be fun!

mwtidd 17-04-2014 09:24
Re: pic: Division OPR Comparison
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Lehmann4967 (Post 1375252)
It really looks as if they're attempting to end the Curie Curse! It is a shame Galileo is lacking a bit, but it'll be fun!
On the contrary, look at the middle of the pack. Those teams are significantly stronger on Galieo. Remember that an alliance will only be as strong as its "weakest" link. Any alliance coming off of Galileo is going to be very well rounded.

joelg236 17-04-2014 12:48
Re: pic: Division OPR Comparison
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by lineskier (Post 1375276)
On the contrary, look at the middle of the pack. Those teams are significantly stronger on Galieo. Remember that an alliance will only be as strong as its "weakest" link. Any alliance coming off of Galileo is going to be very well rounded.
In OPR only. I wouldn't count out some of our middle tier teams.

Tim Lehmann4967 17-04-2014 22:16
Re: pic: Division OPR Comparison
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by lineskier (Post 1375276)
On the contrary, look at the middle of the pack. Those teams are significantly stronger on Galieo. Remember that an alliance will only be as strong as its "weakest" link. Any alliance coming off of Galileo is going to be very well rounded.
Galileo, while having a lower starting OPR is much more of a well rounded division. Curie, is pretty stacked near the top, and drops off significantly. it would be very cool to watch if there was a alliance made up of those high OPR teams. That is very unlikely to happen though, and to some extent OPR does not mean much in this years game.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 21:56.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi