Re: Successful Team Ups By State
 

All you have to do is add a HTTP request and all of your old stuff will still work. Its just minor addition in your code prior to pulling all the data when you initialize a HTML stream or json reader or however you access their api

Re: Successful Team Ups By State
 

Got it working again. The results are attached.

The columns are:
1) team1
2) team2
3) # of times team1 beat team2
4) # of times team2 beat team1
5) # of times team1 and team2 opposed and tied
6) # of times that team1 and team2 were on the same alliance and won
7) # of times that team1 and team2 were on the same alliance and lost
8) # of times that team1 and team2 were on the same alliance and tied

This is all per the Blue Alliance data since 2002. If people are interested I can share the program; there are a lot of knobs you can twist if you're interested.

Re: Successful Team Ups By State
 

Thanks for posting, it's just a little difficult to work with right now. This appears to include every match in existence, not just event wins together. Would it be possible to filter by multiple wins in a single finals series?

Also, when filtering by most matches won together, the first several thousand results are a team playing with itself. In one strange instance I found that 4543 apparently has both won and lost a match against themselves. :yikes:

Re: Successful Team Ups By State
 

Team 1986 team Titanium and team 1806 S.W.A.T. both out of the Kansas City Missouri area have teamed up qutie a bit, invluding elims on Newton this year. They also won the K.C. regional last year in 2013.

Re: Successful Team Ups By State
 

I think that would be this match: http://www.thebluealliance.com/match/2013mttd_qm47

Re: Successful Team Ups By State
 

Fun Fact: As far back as I can find, 254/971 have never lost a match together. Ever. (including offseasons) All 5 regional wins have been at SVR (2004, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2014) and were straight 6-0 runs except 2009, which involved 1 tie. 971 was the alliance captain in all 5 victories.

Re: Successful Team Ups By State
 

Another alliance that might make the list in the future is the one we have formed with our friends 971. I know your friendship with the Poofs goes back a little farther but we've had some tremendous success together in the few times we've hooked up.

In 2012, the alliance of 1678/971/3189 went undefeated in elims at the Sacramento regional. Our scores in elims were 50-17, 35-22, 52-26, 61-28, 63-30, 63-26 (in order from QF-1 through F-2).

This year, the alliance of 971/1678/766 also went undefeated in elims at the Sacramento regional. Our scores were 225-115, 265-95, 236-97, 256-95, 182-91, 216-87 (again QF-1 through F-2). If anyone's counting at this point, that's 10 out of 12 matches where we at least doubled our opponent's score.

Then at champs this year, the alliance of 1678/971/5136 (all from California) went undefeated all the way through Divisions and Einstein, beating the alliance of 254/469/2848 handily. OK, so that didn't actually happen. Maybe next year?

Re: Successful Team Ups By State
 

801 + 1592
Florida, tend to build twins actually
1251 + 179
Florida, built twins this year

Re: Successful Team Ups By State
 

Well... This sums up 548 and 67

Re: Successful Team Ups By State
 

It could have! But you guys just had to go and pick that lousy Canadian team...

Re: Successful Team Ups By State
 

By the luck of the draw, 2729 was paired once with 2590 during qualification rounds at every competition we attended this year and scored no less than 200 points as a part of the alliance. Go to show the strength of their team and robot! The other-side of the coin, we had to face 2590 in quarterfinals at our two district competitions. They are an excellent group to align with!

Re: Successful Team Ups By State
 

In the north west, 2471 (Team Mean Machine) won with 2046 (Bear Metal) multiple times. All that comes to mind is Seattle 2012, and Portland 2013. Unfortunately, we only got to play with them in one match this year. (Hopefully we'll see more of them next year ;) )

Re: Successful Team Ups By State
 

I checked over some of this and I was missing some data from earlier this year. If anyone sees something amiss let me know.

Re: Successful Team Ups By State
 

So, that 1986-1806 team up people were talking about earlier...
The team that has handed 1806 the most losses is 1986, who have beaten 1806 10 times.
Likewise, 1806 has been on an alliance that has bested 1986 and company 7 times, which is the most any one team has beaten them.

However, 1986 and 1806's alliance record is 19-4-1.

Re: Successful Team Ups By State
 

Now that everyone's probably bored of this thread, here's some data that answers the question more directly.

The columns are the same as the previous stuff I've uploaded but this breaks it down showing only the top10 per state. The second one counts only elimination matches.

Some intesting things to note:
1) China's provinces are numbered
2) Israel's provinces have single letter abbreviations