Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Old FIRST compared to New FIRST (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=129466)

Damiaen_Florian 14-05-2014 13:49

Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
I've always heard a lot of people say how much different FIRST was "Back in the day" so I was just wondering if some of the older members on here could discuss what some of the major differences were between these past few years of FIRST and FIRST back in the 1990's and early 2000's, aside from obvious things like different games and less teams. I figure it'd be cool for some of us younger members to get some insight into the history of FIRST.

Koko Ed 14-05-2014 14:21

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damiaen_Florian (Post 1385237)
I've always heard a lot of people say how much different FIRST was "Back in the day" so I was just wondering if some of the older members on here could discuss what some of the major differences were between these past few years of FIRST and FIRST back in the 1990's and early 2000's, aside from obvious things like different games and less teams. I figure it'd be cool for some of us younger members to get some insight into the history of FIRST.

This terrific video gives you a good idea about what happened in 1992.

Jay O'Donnell 14-05-2014 14:23

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Koko Ed (Post 1385243)
This terrific video gives you a good idea about what happened in 1992.

Dean had some serious facial hair...

Koko Ed 14-05-2014 14:39

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
Some more videos from Youtube:
1996 Championships.
http://youtu.be/T8N6lnle1fc
http://youtu.be/flV2hM1m4sE
http://youtu.be/cOmCZobK7S0
http://youtu.be/y4W84N_4ELE
http://youtu.be/-Tr6xtPZ28k
1995
http://youtu.be/6yJ4suxGFFg
1994
http://s50.photobucket.com/user/X-Ca...tml?sort=3&o=0
1993
http://youtu.be/1rZyU9Xu8GE

Chris Hibner 14-05-2014 14:56

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
In my day, we had to drive the robot up hill, no matter which direction we were driving. But we liked it.

The biggest change I've noticed is the family atmosphere is not nearly what it used to be. What I mean by that is you used to have 150 teams or so (total) and practically everyone knew everyone else. Now there are just too many teams to keep track of.

This is an interesting topic - maybe I'll post more when I have some time.

Adam Freeman 14-05-2014 15:25

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Koko Ed (Post 1385243)
This terrific video gives you a good idea about what happened in 1992.

Incredible video Ed. Very insightful on what it was like at the start of all of this.

Such a different time (small and unproven concept) but so powerful that all the same concepts (cooperation between mentors and students, GP, competition, etc..) are still exactly the same today.

One of the biggest things I noticed is that Dean is much more engaging and interesting when he is speaking in this manner, than how he talks to us now. I wish he would go back to the speech pattern he used back then.

Alan Anderson 14-05-2014 15:31

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam Freeman (Post 1385258)
One of the biggest things I noticed is that Dean is much more engaging and interesting when he is speaking in this manner, than how he talks to us now. I wish he would go back to the speech pattern he used back then.

If you've ever had the pleasure of listening to Dean Kamen speak in front of a relatively small group, you'll know that he does still talk that way. He's just not able to express his passion effectively when addressing thousands of people at once.

Kims Robot 14-05-2014 16:03

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Koko Ed (Post 1385246)

And there goes my afternoon! Im not sure I knew this existed!! This was my first year (saw my first FIRST robot - Hook - flash by in the first video... gotta watch to see if there is more!!) Hexagon Havoc was such an awesome game, I'd love to see it replayed!! Gosh they really need ESPN to do something like this again...

I know there are some "old days" threads floating around too, I'll have to dig them up.

Peter Matteson 14-05-2014 16:05

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Anderson (Post 1385262)
If you've ever had the pleasure of listening to Dean Kamen speak in front of a relatively small group, you'll know that he does still talk that way. He's just not able to express his passion effectively when addressing thousands of people at once.

He was even far better when he spoke at my college graduation than he is now. I think he misjudges the audience when it's already people involved in FIRST. He doesn't engage them the same way or act as though he has to earn and keep their attention.

Koko Ed 14-05-2014 16:06

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
The Technokats History Project is the best place to get information about old skool FIRST.

Travis Hoffman 14-05-2014 16:43

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
I miss Disney. And no bumpers.

Anyway, here's a link to video of the 1999 Championship eliminations. I believe much of this footage was recorded for a Delphi-produced video on FIRST:

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...0EDA122AFA63BE

You'll see quite a few recognizable faces in this!

Alan Anderson 14-05-2014 17:19

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Koko Ed (Post 1385279)

...has not yet been fixed after it failed to transfer cleanly to the new web server. Sorry. It's on our To Do list.

PayneTrain 14-05-2014 17:21

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam Freeman (Post 1385258)
One of the biggest things I noticed is that Dean is much more engaging and interesting when he is speaking in this manner, than how he talks to us now. I wish he would go back to the speech pattern he used back then.

To add on to what Alan said, I remember how night-and-day he was going from the opening ceremonies last year to the Dean's List presentation. It's mostly stage fright, I guess.

I think a comeback of the beard would help immensely...

Steven Donow 14-05-2014 17:36

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Travis Hoffman (Post 1385286)
And no bumpers.

This is, to me, the biggest difference when watching older games.

Alex Cormier 14-05-2014 17:37

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
It was great back before bumpers, when teams actually built strong drive bases that could withstand abuse.

Zach101 14-05-2014 18:34

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
Great thread guys. For being in FIRST for the first time it was fun watching the videos and learning more about FIRST's history. It would be great if you could find anymore of those history videos of different years that would be great cause its so fun seeing how technology and FIRST teams grew and got better over the years.:D :D :D

Brad Hanel 14-05-2014 18:47

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
After watching the videos, I've come to the conclusion that the biggest difference is the hair.

Mark McLeod 14-05-2014 18:52

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
Here are videos from a few more years:

FIRST 1997 Championship Final Match
FIRST 1998 Championship Semi-finals 45vs67
FIRST 1999 DOUBLE TROUBLE™ Championship Finals part 1
FIRST 1999 DOUBLE TROUBLE™ Championship Finals part 2
FIRST 2000 CO-OPERTITION™ FIRST Championship Match
FIRST 2001 DIABOLICAL DYNAMICS™ Match
FIRST 2002 ZONE ZEAL™ Championship Semi-Finals Match

Zach101 14-05-2014 18:56

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Brad Hanel (Post 1385321)
After watching the videos, I've come to the conclusion that the biggest difference is the hair.

Lol no its definitely the glasses:yikes: and when I saw the hair and the glasses together...:ahh: :ahh: :ahh: :ahh:

MooreteP 14-05-2014 20:31

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Cormier (Post 1385302)
It was great back before bumpers, when teams actually built strong drive bases that could withstand abuse.

T'was great before bumpers, but nostalgia patinates the past.
The drivetrains weren't necessarily more robust, but the Robots were less complex and delicate. Fewer connections to fault. Far lower data rates. No cameras, no autonomous. Not really Robots, Specialized RC cars.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damiaen_Florian (Post 1385237)
I've always heard a lot of people say how much different FIRST was "Back in the day" so I was just wondering if some of the older members on here could discuss what some of the major differences were between these past few years of FIRST and FIRST back in the 1990's and early 2000's, aside from obvious things like different games and less teams. I figure it'd be cool for some of us younger members to get some insight into the history of FIRST.

Less teams is really the only significant difference to me.
It's harder once I get to four digits.
This really hit home this year:
http://imgur.com/a/v9TcU
(Robot Crate pictures)

The overall vibe is intact. It's like a Grateful Dead concert with Robots.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/supato...57643219020225

EricH 14-05-2014 20:44

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
How about this one for all you younguns: No autonomous.

Its first appearance as an official part of the game was in 2003. Before then, drivers all the way.


Also, most of the games before about 2005 (exception: 2002) had some large structure or obstacle in the middle of the field. Maneuvering around or over it was always entertaining.

Jake177 15-05-2014 08:25

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
The general match format has changed several times throughout the years.
  • 1992-1998: 1v1v1 - A match consisted of three robots on the field, each trying to score the most points. (Based on old videos, it looks like elimination rounds may have been 1v1 for at least some of these games.)
  • 1999-2000: 2v2 - 1999 marked the beginning of the "Alliance Era" forcing teams to work together on the field.
  • 2001: 4v0 - All four robots on the field were working together on the same alliance.
  • 2002-2004: 2v2 - Direct competition during matches returned in 2002.
  • 2005-Present: 3v3 - In 2005, a third team was added to each alliance.
Also, 2001 was the first year Championship was separated into divisions.

[Shameless Plug]
When I was a student, I put together this video for 177's 10th anniversary. It gives a little insight into the 1995-2004 games.
[/Shameless Plug]

Matt C 15-05-2014 09:16

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
Small Parts Inc. :D

No bumpers. :eek:

Epcot Championship :cool:

I was a student from 1999-2001... life was way different before Andy-Mark.

Andrew Rudolph 15-05-2014 11:12

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
There was pretty much no COTs up until about 2002, you had to buy things from (or similar to) what was in the Small Parts Catalog. Up until ~2001 there was limits on how much stuff you could use as well. Think 15 gears, 10' of extrusion, etc..

Being on a team in Miami it was great, we could drive over and pick up parts the same day we ordered them, and play with the cool coin machine in the lobby.

rsisk 15-05-2014 11:30

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Koko Ed (Post 1385243)
This terrific video gives you a good idea about what happened in 1992.

Wow, where has this video been all my life?

cj3958 15-05-2014 12:44

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
I will preface this by saying that I was not there durring this time, however my dad was, and I went to some competitions once i was old enough to understand what was going on. From what my dad has told me, the biggest thing that was different was the number of motors and gearboxes available. It was extremely difficult to get torque out of motors back then, because none of the motors has a standard shaft that was keyed or something similar to what we have today, because all of the motors were designed to be put in a drill or something like that. I got the impression that it would be like if every motor had an output shaft similar to the window motor, and each team had to figure out how to get that shaft to move their drivetrain separately, because there was no andymark that would make a gearbox with that output shaft as an input. On that note, every gearbox was also a struggle, because you had to effectively weld gears to shafts to get the torque to transfer because there was no standard hex shaft or hex shaft berrings or hex shaft bores to use on gears. Towards the end(just before andymark came out) people would use dewalt motor transmissions in order to get shifting and have a good gearbox they could use for everything.

Kimmeh 15-05-2014 13:10

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Hibner (Post 1385250)
The biggest change I've noticed is the family atmosphere is not nearly what it used to be. What I mean by that is you used to have 150 teams or so (total) and practically everyone knew everyone else. Now there are just too many teams to keep track of.

I'm the most sad about missing out on this. I feel like those of you who have been around for a while have a closeness that the rest of us don't.
Sure, it helps that that also means that you've known each other longer.

Also, keeping up with how 150 robots work is far easier than keeping up with how 2,000+ robots work...

Zyrano 15-05-2014 15:12

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
I'll throw in a couple of things (for 1999)

1. Drill motors and transmissions for drive train
2. Most parts were fabricated (no kit bot chassis/transmissions available)
3. no bumpers
4. For Californians, 1st (and only) NASA Moffet field Hanger 1 regional
5. More contact, I remembered shattering a team's PVC basket into many pieces during a match... We even picked up an opponent's robot (some what unintentionally), one of my favorite robotics memory is captured in the this picture...


EricH 15-05-2014 20:53

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Zyrano (Post 1385562)


I remember the red robot (which is actually on blue alliance). Does SuperChimp still compete in FRC, or were they done after that year?

BTW: I think this picture also shows the reason for the rotating lights used to identify alliances (2000-2003, replaced by LEDs from 2004-2005, replaced by flags from 2006-2009, replaced by bumpers starting in 2010) AND the requirement to have the team number visible all over the place. Ah, the rotating lights--so visible, and so annoying to mount so they'd stay intact. And yes, they counted towards your weight. So did the battery.

Chris Hibner 15-05-2014 22:37

Re: Old FIRST compared to New FIRST
 
One thing that hasn't been mentioned yet is the field size. Prior to 1999, the field was about half the size of what it is now. In fact, they used to have two fields set up side-by-side at every event. As soon as one match ended on one field, they would immediately start introducing the next match on the other field while they scored and reset the field on the match that just ended.

1999 was a rectangular field (I want to say it was only 12' x 24'), and the previous three years had a hexagonal field.

Another fun thing about the field is how it was managed in 2000 and 2001. They tried to keep the idea from pre-2000 of introducing the next match while the previous match was being cleaned up. They did this by alternating the ends of the field. In 2000, both alliances drove from the same side of the field, and the game pieces were lined up on the far side of the field. The next match, the drivers were all on the opposite end of the field. This was so the next match could start setting up while the current match was being played. 2001 was the same. They finally scrapped that idea for the 2003 season.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 15:26.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi