![]() |
Re: Indiana going to Districts for 2015
I won't be able to quote it but I remember reading one of Jim Zondag's informational posts about FiM and playing outside and inside of the district. When FiM was first installed, they pushed to allow teams outside the district to visit and play. This was shut down for some reason, I don't remember how. I do not think is going to stay that way, it isolates too many things. When more districts start to form, I would image they would look at teams visiting outside districts if they are able.
I could be missing something here, but I think its a good discussion to have. |
Re: Indiana going to Districts for 2015
With FIRST having adopted a common point system for all districts, it opens up the possibility (once allowed) for teams to play at district events outside of their own district - you can earn your points wherever, then if you earn enough compete in your own district championship. That possible future is very easy to see right now!
However, non-district teams are at a slight disadvantage - there's currently no line of sight for a non-district team to play at a district event. Say you play at a district event and win, or win chairman's, etc... it would get you nothing. You would earn points, but as your team isn't part of a district those points mean nothing - a non district team doing well at a district event does not provide any path towards advancement to the next level of play. The only benefit I could see, given what we currently know, is if a district event cost less and you could play there before playing in a regional event - the added practice and experience could help you at your regional. As things currently stand, opening up cross-district play seems like it could create an artificial boundary between district and regional teams, where district teams all interplay to their hearts content, and regional teams all interplay, and the two only ever meet at champs. Now, I will grant that this could be interesting... kind of like baseball with the NL and AL (prior to 1997, when interleague play was first introduced). Looking at it that way does start to imply a whole different structure for champs, though! |
Re: Indiana going to Districts for 2015
Quote:
|
Re: Indiana going to Districts for 2015
Quote:
When I refer to ID teams traditionally attending PNW area events I am referring specifically to the time period after the existence of SLC. You are correct that it is a little more complex. FIRST originally intended for all of ID to be a part of the PNW District. The projected number of teams for the PNW District was based on all of the ID teams being part of the district. When venues were being scouted and selected it was with the thought that ID teams would be a part of the district. The decision to have 10 events was based on thinking that ID teams would be a part of the district. We were then told that FIRST was told that the ID teams did not wish to be a part of the PNW District. We then went back and asked if the N. ID teams could join the district. We were then told that FIRST was told that the N. ID teams were not interested. Before the 2014 season had ended I for one and others asked again if the ID or N. ID teams could join us for the 2015 season. We were again told that the ID teams still did not wish to join. So it is not because FIRST nor the PNW district does not wish for ID to be a part of the district. If you want to be a part of the PNW district then you need to gain support from a majority of the teams in ID and directly let FIRST know that you wish to join the PNW district. Unfortunately at this point it is probably too late for that to happen for the 2015 season as the process of selecting and scheduling the events for 2015 is well on the way to being solidified. Quote:
However event volunteers are only a small part of the equation. You also need to keep in mind the key volunteers as there is frequently more than one event per week so you need at least two trained key volunteers for every one of those positions. The reality is also that the number of volunteers needed for a 36 team event is substantially the same as for a 64 team event. You can get by with a few less judges but for the other positions you need the same number. In fact you actually need more if you do not hire Show Ready Events to do the AV production and provide the catering and additional support. Quote:
Quote:
The problem with your idea of a global points system is that you bring up the question of what to do about the teams that can only attend one event. Simply doubling their points does not account for the "valleys of doom" and "coattail" effects. Minimizing those effects was one of the guiding factors behind the unified points system. Having it totally based on points also throws a wrench into how the culture awards advance and would require a re-write of the Unified Points System. It would also be very unfair as the points that a team can earn are directly related to the number of teams at an event which is why efforts are made to make the number of teams at a district event as close as is possible. So the teams that compete at a traditional Regional would be at an automatic disadvantage compared to teams in the District System. |
Re: Indiana going to Districts for 2015
Quote:
|
Re: Indiana going to Districts for 2015
Quote:
And dat unbag window. |
Re: Indiana going to Districts for 2015
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:02. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi