Re: Best gyro for frc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ayeckley
(Post 1417053)
Would there not also be a "low" frequency (<2 KHz-ish) magnetic field associated with the fundamental brush-pass frequency, in addition to the broad, higher-frequency spectrum you described? I'm being wishy-washy on the exact frequency because I don't recall the armature design of the CIM. I don't believe I've ever had one apart, personally.
|
You're probably right here. I know that brushes can radiate a lot of electromagnetic fields over a large range of frequencies including some higher frequencies (well over 15kHz), but I don't know about the lower end and how strong different frequencies are. If the lower frequency fields are the problem, then I agree, twist and try to move farther away.
For higher RF frequency, you don't need to have a high permeability to block magnetic fields. I think the 15kHz frequency is in this higher range where it's easy to shield with conductive metals.
Quote:
Not sure I agree there, but that's off-topic.
|
A higher frequency magnetic field causes more interference, both common mode and differential mode.
The noise that's induced to the gyro's signal through differential mode interference (meaning your gyro's cable is acting like a loop, picking up the magnetic field) is proportional to the effective loop area, the strength of the magnetic field, and the frequency of the field. Each time the motor's power switches from on to off, faraday's law says that some voltage induced in your gyro's signal. If the event happens 15 times more often per unit of time, you get 15 times more noise.
For common mode interference, which is when both your return and signal are affected in the same way, a higher frequency magnetic field will provide more opportunity for parasitic capacitive coupling to ground.
However, the higher frequency may be easier to shield from, but I don't think I've ever seen an FRC team use shielded cables for anything before.
|