![]() |
New Talon SRX and CAN with the 2015 Control System
Hello everyone,
With the Talon SRX coming around and the 2015 control system being a lot more CAN-friendly, my team is thinking of making the switch to a CAN control system. This will only be our third year as a team, and we have zero experience with the jaguars, though from looking around, it seems that the biggest issue with them were loose connectors (which should not be a problem with the SRX) and low voltage-induced brownouts. That being said, here are some questions I have:
|
Re: New Talon SRX and CAN with the 2015 Control System
To answer your questions in order...
- I don't think anyone except CTRE has seen the new Talon's yet. I *think* Beta teams are going to get them at some point (we have the new Victors already), but until teams can put them through their paces you won't have much information. - Define "noticeable". The control system does have timing expectations for the CAN bus, and I bet if you search for "CAN Timeout Exception" you'll find some more information on CD for it. As CAN bus is implemented through daisy-chaining one module to the next, you need to be aware of total bus length and actively work to keep that to a minimum. Keep all the components close to each other any you won't have a problem... spread them out all over the robot so your bus is a meter+ long and you could run into issues. - With it being a whole new control system, I'm willing to bet that yes, there will be other issues this year. Given the work testing it (by the control system team and the alpha/beta testers), i don't expect any issues that do crop up to be show-stopping. |
Re: New Talon SRX and CAN with the 2015 Control System
Quote:
|
Re: New Talon SRX and CAN with the 2015 Control System
A CAN Bus does not have increased latency when more devices are added. They are all wired in parallel. The addressing is dealt with when the address is placed on the bus.
The only worry is that a dead device or bad cable can kill the entire bus, so troubleshooting a dead bus is a matter of splitting the bus into sections to see when it starts working. |
Re: New Talon SRX and CAN with the 2015 Control System
Quote:
Changing from the Jaguar's RJ12 connectors to the Weidmuller terminals is going to reduce cable and wiring issues significantly. |
Re: New Talon SRX and CAN with the 2015 Control System
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: New Talon SRX and CAN with the 2015 Control System
Quote:
Quote:
The Talon SRX has two sets of CAN pigtails. I don't really see that working well in a star topology, alas. |
Re: New Talon SRX and CAN with the 2015 Control System
Quote:
|
Re: New Talon SRX and CAN with the 2015 Control System
The CAN spec calls a line structure. You might get away with a star topology, but it is not recommended by specification.
|
Re: New Talon SRX and CAN with the 2015 Control System
Quote:
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/all...25795A000FC025 |
Re: New Talon SRX and CAN with the 2015 Control System
Quote:
|
Re: New Talon SRX and CAN with the 2015 Control System
I was just looking at a pile of Talon SRXs that we bought for this year's robot. Those green/yellow pigtails sure look like a nuisance to connect!
They want to be daisy chained, so an "in" and an "out" connector as male/female pairs make sense to use. I'd love a standardized connector for CAN bus on these robots, but it looks like the folks at CTRE didn't think this was important. Can we make one? I like those crimp terminals that go into Hirose, Molex, TE or whatever housings, but there are unfortunately about a hundred incompatible types out there. Suggestions? How do you plan to connect Talon CAN wires to each other? |
Re: New Talon SRX and CAN with the 2015 Control System
Quote:
|
Re: New Talon SRX and CAN with the 2015 Control System
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:12. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi