Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Technical Discussion (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=22)
-   -   Belt Drive Design Problem (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=131193)

AustinSchuh 24-11-2014 12:44

Re: Belt Drive Design Problem
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe G. (Post 1409750)
Curious -- has anyone in this thread experimented with belt pitches other than 5mm? A quick look at the gates datasheet suggests that a 22t (minimum size) 8mm pitch sprocket with a 12mm wide belt will have slightly more carrying capacity than a 15mm wide 5mm pitch belt with a similar sprocket diameter, and significantly more than the equivalent 9mm wide belt. I'm always trying to squeeze some extra width out of drive designs, but have heard just enough 9mm belt horror stories to discourage me from pursuing them.

5mm is the biggest that is still really easy to source. We've never had a good enough reason to be worth the procurement challenge.

asid61 24-11-2014 16:04

Re: Belt Drive Design Problem
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinSchuh (Post 1409803)
5mm is the biggest that is still really easy to source. We've never had a good enough reason to be worth the procurement challenge.

You can get 0.375" (9.52mm) from SDP-SI, although if they're out of stock you're out of luck. The decision would have to be made very early on.

EDIT: Never mind, the profile is low-load. Not good for drivetrain usually.

pfreivald 24-11-2014 17:13

Re: Belt Drive Design Problem
 
SDP-SI is awesome. We've used their center-to-center calculator since we started using belts, and have never had a problem. (But we've never used 9mm, either.)

Travis Schuh 24-11-2014 17:59

Re: Belt Drive Design Problem
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by asid61 (Post 1409847)
You can get 0.375" (9.52mm) from SDP-SI, although if they're out of stock you're out of luck. The decision would have to be made very early on.

The .375 profile is a L profile, not GT2 or GT3. This is a trapezoidal profile, so its load rating is significantly less than even HTD for a similar size. (L stands for Light, while HTD stands for High Torque Drive). The strength of this profile is very likely less than 9mm wide 5mm HTD. The reason you would use a trapezoidal profile is if you have small loads but need minimal backlash, as it will perform better than a HTD or GT2 profile.

asid61 24-11-2014 19:21

Re: Belt Drive Design Problem
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Travis Schuh (Post 1409872)
The .375 profile is a L profile, not GT2 or GT3. This is a trapezoidal profile, so its load rating is significantly less than even HTD for a similar size. (L stands for Light, while HTD stands for High Torque Drive). The strength of this profile is very likely less than 9mm wide 5mm HTD. The reason you would use a trapezoidal profile is if you have small loads but need minimal backlash, as it will perform better than a HTD or GT2 profile.

Oh. I thought it stood for "large". Totally forgot about profile.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:34.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi