![]() |
pic: 4464 Preseason Drive WIP
|
Re: pic: 4464 Preseason Drive WIP
Nice design. I like the couplers which will make it easier to remove the gearbox.
Why did you choose to put the CIMs above the wheels? Is the belly pan space worth the significantly higher center of mass? .25" birch plywood is a very good material for a belly pan. It's stiff, light and easy to cut or drill holes in. |
Re: pic: 4464 Preseason Drive WIP
It appears as if by delegating that much room to your wheel wells as well as supporting them on both ends that you are offsetting the advantage of the inverted CIM setup, and in the end are saving less room than possible. I'd actually argue that you would open up more chassis space just by having cantilevered wheels and non-inverted CIMs, which will also bring a lower CoG, and make maintenance far easier.
To answer your question, 1/4" plywood makes for a quick and excellent bellypan for those who want to save time and/or do not have the resources for a machined aluminum one. It can be argued that the aluminum ones provide more stiffness, but if you design your frame right the plywood will be perfectly acceptable. Another question I will have to ask is why you chose 6 CIMs. Do you have mathematical proof of the advantages of the other two motors that you personally have done, or are you going off the anecdotes of other teams? I'm not saying 6 CIMs are a bad thing, but having once been a part of the hype that is built around them I now only design 4 motor drivetrains because after doing the math countless times I haven't found any advantages that outweigh the potential disadvantages. |
Re: pic: 4464 Preseason Drive WIP
Quote:
I have two major gripes with WCD setups: belt/chain access and gearbox removal. This design specifically aimed to make both of those as easy as possible. The coupled output shaft design would be much harder to do with cantilevered wheels, as would keeping the belts outside of the gearbox. Quote:
|
Re: pic: 4464 Preseason Drive WIP
Quote:
|
Re: pic: 4464 Preseason Drive WIP
Quote:
Gearbox removal is definitely an Achilles heal of WCD. Yet it can be mitigated by making a more bulletproof gearbox. We've experienced a bit of this both years we've done WCD, and this year will probably do steel output shafts as a result. WCP's WCD blocks make chain access for chain maintenance irrelevant (assuming proper sprocket spacing). Even replacing an axle with limited access isn't an issue. |
Re: pic: 4464 Preseason Drive WIP
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
This design trades a bit of convenience in wheel access and a bit of space for much easier gearbox and belt access. We think it's a worthy trade-off. An aside: The wheel wells are as big as they are so that this design can fit either 1.5'' VexPro traction wheels or Colsons. We'll decide which we like better as we test the thing. I do wish that VexPro sold a live-axle colson hub with a standard bolt circle for mounting pulleys, though, as it would save us one hex versahub and one hex bearing per side in that configuration. It's a minor gripe, though. Quote:
|
Re: pic: 4464 Preseason Drive WIP
I just realized I never posted the CAD for this, which I should do if we're going to use this (or any derivative of it) during build season.
So, here it is. This is a slightly earlier version than the one that we actually built - the only major difference is the size of the wheel wells, which since been enlarged to allow us the option of using Colson wheels and to move the motors a bit back from the edge of the frame. http://www.mediafire.com/download/t8...ssis_0.1.1.stp |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 23:10. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi