![]() |
Re: Keeping the main breaker from tripping
Quote:
|
Re: Keeping the main breaker from tripping
I doubt FIRST would rule it's use illegal because it modifies performance of the item being sprayed.
That said, I definately believe they might ban it's use for health reasons. Dust Off is difluoroethane, a refrigerant. Here is the "Safety" text from Wikipedia on difluoroethane. Quote:
|
Re: Keeping the main breaker from tripping
Quote:
|
Re: Keeping the main breaker from tripping
Shouldint we be trying not to draw more current than the system is supposed to handle rather than stop a safety mechanism from activating? Like turning of a smoke alarm rather than putting out the fire?
|
Re: Keeping the main breaker from tripping
Quote:
|
Re: Keeping the main breaker from tripping
Quote:
|
Re: Keeping the main breaker from tripping
Quote:
|
Re: Keeping the main breaker from tripping
Quote:
|
Re: Keeping the main breaker from tripping
Quote:
Maybe a better question would be is the breaker thermally triggered because that is simply one of the many ways the creator decided to implement it, or is the "left over" heat from previous operation indicative of actual risk? The question would be, what is the case where the breaker trips meant to prevent?
I can't find any documentation stating which is true, but I would guess that it is a combination of all of the above. If so then in the last case (protecting motors and components from excessive heat), then cooling the breaker DOES circumvent the system and add risk. Risk of overheating a motor, controller, etc. because the breaker "thought" that the system was much cooler than it was. Any thoughts? |
Re: Keeping the main breaker from tripping
Quote:
1. 6 cim is more efficient than 4 cim during high loads like pushing and turning (less motor heating, less speed drop under load, robot seems a little stronger) 2. Distribute load between motors to reduce heating for back to back matches 3. Redundancy, we lost a talon last year, robot was still very much driveable other than not driving straight |
Re: Keeping the main breaker from tripping
Quote:
Essentially the goal is to have a high speed which is great for getting across long distances fast and a low speed which is good for fine maneuvering/pushing. If you are having your high speed at 12fps (I think that's what you're saying?) there really isn't much incentive to use shifters anyway. When robots use shifters, its usually because they want to have a really fast gearing that would stall the motors if you tried to push at that gearing. Therefore, its best to be able to downshift so you can hold your own if you get into a confrontation. 12fps isn't much for a high gear, that's usually what people do in single speed setups. |
Re: Keeping the main breaker from tripping
Quote:
|
Re: Keeping the main breaker from tripping
Quote:
|
Re: Keeping the main breaker from tripping
I can see it now - FIRST bans using canned air to cool parts. Teams then begin keeping multiple spare main breakers in a cooler on ice and swap them between elimination matches.
|
Re: Keeping the main breaker from tripping
Quote:
If you were to have a short you'd see a huge sudden surge of current, which would cause a solenoid to pull the contacts apart. I assume the one we use features both methods, but I've never looked inside one before. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:04. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi