![]() |
Re: 2015 Recycle Rush Scoring
I couldn't find anything in the rules (haven't read entire thing tho), can we open the totes and stack them inside of each other?
|
Re: 2015 Recycle Rush Scoring
Quote:
|
Re: 2015 Recycle Rush Scoring
Quote:
Please read page 19 of the manual. |
Re: 2015 Recycle Rush Scoring
Quote:
They are intended to be closed- THey are zip tied shut. |
Re: 2015 Recycle Rush Scoring
I originally thought the coopertition points were a red herring since they won't really affect ranking since averages are calculated to 2 decimal places but the high value of the stacked totes probably means each alliance should try to put two yellow totes on the step once it is clear of grey ones. Assumes another robot will complete the stack of 4.
|
Re: 2015 Recycle Rush Scoring
You're forgetting a situation:
......0 ___0 0________ = ? (I believe this is a void configuration resulting in 6pts, however there was not an example given to this situation in the manual.) anyways here is how I see the scoring of the yellow totes alone in their respective situations (assuming they are compleatly contained by the auto zones): ___0___0___0____ = 6pts .....0 ___0________0___= 6pts ...0 ...0 __0________= 20pts (possibly 26, depending is a stack and a set can simultaneously exist) |
Re: 2015 Recycle Rush Scoring
A similar situation is called out at the bottom of page 19. They are not in a single column and do not meet point A of being a stack.
|
Re: 2015 Recycle Rush Scoring
Quote:
Okay, so that is considered a TOTE SET, which is defined by 3 golden totes in the auton area. The CONTAINER SET is the tall recycling bins, NOT the totes. 3 of the large bins in the scoring area count for 8 points. A STACKED TOTE SET are all 3 golden totes stacked on top of each other as per figure 3-1 , or 3.1.2.1 in the rules. It appears, though I may be wrong, that 2 totes or two bins dont count? |
Re: 2015 Recycle Rush Scoring
Quote:
A container set on the other hand does need to have three present in the auto zone in order to be counted (definition of container set, rule 3.1.2.1) |
Re: 2015 Recycle Rush Scoring
The rule you quoted is right, but if you look closely they use the word any, not all when defining the container set.
|
Re: 2015 Recycle Rush Scoring
I wish to confirm I am interpreting the following rule correctly:
LITTER Scored in/on RECYCLING CONTAINER 6 per RECYCLING CONTAINER I am understanding that we are allowed to have various Recycling Containers one next to another and have one piece of Litter lying on top of these Recycling Containers instead of inserting one Litter per Recycling Container. |
Re: 2015 Recycle Rush Scoring
Quote:
Situation 1 would be worth 6 points, a Tote Set. Situation 2 would be worth 6 points as well, still a Tote set because you need all 3 totes to be stacked to be a Stacked Tote set and worth 20 points. Situation 3 would be worth 20 points, as it is a Stacked Tote set. This requires all of the totes to be stacked in a single stack. See section 3.1.2.1 |
Re: 2015 Recycle Rush Scoring
Quote:
|
Re: 2015 Recycle Rush Scoring
Quote:
|
Re: 2015 Recycle Rush Scoring
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi