![]() |
Re: TNA Blacklist
Quote:
|
Re: TNA Blacklist
Quote:
|
Re: TNA Blacklist
When does this end though? A team on your alliance refuses to agree to the agreement, are you going to blacklist them too?
I feel the overall negatives to this agreement seriously outweigh the benefits...like hurting a team's reputation over something that's "just a game".... |
Re: TNA Blacklist
I really hope they kill this rule with a team update.
|
Re: TNA Blacklist
Quote:
The real danger is the TNA in quarters/semis. |
Re: TNA Blacklist
Quote:
|
Re: TNA Blacklist
Quote:
Teams in this game do not operate in a vacuum. This game is different, Frank did not lie, and almost all actions on the field are highly cooperative. Whatever match score your alliance ends up with, all three teams on that alliance have to live with it. In the case of TNA, all six teams on the field have to live with it. A key point to FRC is gracious professionalism. What goes along with this in match play is a few things, but mainly its simply that when a team is on the field, that team should put out the best effort it possibly can. For a while now the main take away of this was the immorality of throwing matches. Now however, there are no wins or losses, and all that matters is how much you score, period. So even now more then ever, not scoring as much as you know you can by not taking part in TNA, in my eyes is somewhat akin to throwing a match, since it takes zero skill to complete it, and is purely a choice. Of course if no one wants to do it then, hey, do whatever you want. But as far as I can see, if even one team wants to, the rest have a moral obligation to do so, since there is no loser in doing it. As it stands now, even if one alliance was to try to screw the other one by, say, pushing noodles into the landfill, no one is more hurt than they would have been than they would have been by not participating in the first place, at least not directly. Take this with a grain of salt, I do think straight up throwing a match is worse than not taking part in TNA, but what is for certain is that I certainly hoping I wont have to be on an alliance with a member that takes this stance. I want to, you know, rank highly, and don't want to have to just 'pass that up' from some sort of issue with whether or not the rules intended this. To be honest, I don't like it either, but if its legal, there's no way I could tell my team that we aren't doing it. |
Re: TNA Blacklist
Quote:
Maybe I'm a pessimist in this situation but I would really hope that in the case where it was 5 v 1 in favor of the agreement, that it wouldn't cause alliance in-fighting both on and off the field. |
Re: TNA Blacklist
I wouldn't want my team to be remembered for publicly going against other teams by posting about it online. If you have a problem with something a team did, first talk to their team about it and make sure they didn't legitimately forget or misunderstand. If they really are jerks who are lying to your face, then be the mature one in the situation. There are lots of better and more mature ways to handle that situation then making a list of teams who don't do it. Also, keep in mind an action decided upon by a stressed high school student is a quick two minute match doesn't necessarily reflect the views of their team as a whole.
The noodle agreement, if allowed, is going to cause a lot more harm than good in this game. |
Re: TNA Blacklist
I do not think a list is a good idea. At each regional/district the word will get out who does what. Then if people want they can check video of the match (give the match number ) and see the results.
|
Re: TNA Blacklist
I think that at that point it's beyond silly.
I'm honestly getting tired of this stupid TNA thing. If FIRST doesn't release a rule change, people should just not do it. It gives teams an unfair advantage, and forces other teams into uncomfortable situations where they have to conform or get left behind, and conforming means trusting another alliance, which sometimes is a serious risk. TL;DR The TNA is a dangerous slope and if FIRST doesn't release a rule change people should just not do it as it puts the rest of the teams at a competition in a difficult position. WWWD? What Would Woodie Do? |
Re: TNA Blacklist
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: TNA Blacklist
Quote:
How would a team get off the blacklist? A team could be ostracized for making mistakes, being overwhelmed by problems and making incorrect heat of the moment decisions. Personally, I think the noodle agreement should at least be removed from the playoffs. |
Re: TNA Blacklist
Quote:
|
Re: TNA Blacklist
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 00:03. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi