Best Drivetrain options
 

What do you think is the best drivetrain option for this year. It appears that 6wd drop center drives might have some trouble on the scoring platform because the center wheel will be the only wheel on the platform.

Re: Best Drivetrain options
 

6 or 8wd with no drop and omnis on the front/back. It doesn't change drive characteristics with different weight/center of mass and has no wobble. It can also easily go over the scoring area and with colsons and vex omnis should grip really nicely.

Re: Best Drivetrain options
 

Make sure you power all wheels with this setup.

Re: Best Drivetrain options
 

definately

Re: Best Drivetrain options
 

Slide/H-drive looks very promising. Without defense their is no worry about being pushed around. For a team with limited resources and expertise, this drive train provides the advantages of horizontal motion without the complexity of swerve or mecanum.

Re: Best Drivetrain options
 

i disagree with this the hump is 2 inches with a 16 degree slope having a 6 wheel drop center should have no problem making it over this in fact it would be beneficial because you would be able to pivot and spin while on top very easily,
a 6 wheel drop center is in the conversation for our team

Re: Best Drivetrain options
 

6in 4 wheel west coast. Make it like a mullet, that is to say business in the front party in the back, or in this case traction in the front omni wheels in the back.

Re: Best Drivetrain options
 

Any drive with strafing has a huge advantage this year. Stacking those totes precisely is hard. Like, really, really hard. I speak from experience there.

Re: Best Drivetrain options
 

I believe that's the direction my team will take. Our designs have in-frame tote manipulation, and having a four-wheel setup with omnis in front reduces the racking effects of not having a support between the front wheels that would be prevalent with four "tractionful" wheels.

Re: Best Drivetrain options
 

I don't believe Slide/ H-Drive will be as good as everyone thinks it is, many people are relying on the fact that the horizontal motion will be incredibly helpful. In reality I believe teams will use it as a way of adjusting their precision when needing to stack and line up for totes, which is completely valid until your vision is blocked or you don't have enough room to strafe. It would be better to build tolerance into your loading mechanisms rather than into your drivetrain where the tote being in the proper orientation is everything. Some teams will attempt to do both (Slide and Any-Orientation intake), we will just have to wait and see in practice which proves to be more effective.

Re: Best Drivetrain options
 

As a team we have done mecanum drives for the past 2 years in FTC but we do not see the value in a mecanum drive or a similar option. To be able to fully utilize a drive train like that you must have a lot of time practicing with it. We are not known for finishing robots quickly so we decided to go with a simple 6WD drive train that we get a lot of practice time on rather than spending a bunch of time on building a completely new drive train.

Re: Best Drivetrain options
 

A. Mecanum robots drive exactly like a first-person shooter. In my experience drivers need maybe ten minutes to acclimate to it.

B. Good call--finishing early and getting good practice time is more important than an "ideal" drive train (whatever that is.)

Re: Best Drivetrain options
 

I agree; strafing would be hugely beneficial.
We pretty much unanimously decided on swerve drive, which is a system we already have experience with.

Re: Best Drivetrain options
 

How is it less complex than mecanum?

Re: Best Drivetrain options
 

Take a look at the 2010 game Breakaway. The bumps in that game were much larger and a lot of team made it over just fine.

Here is one of our videos. (Skip to 0:48)